|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
| Re: How is Sarah Czepiel like Annie Oakley? Annie Oakley was a "sure |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.nuke.the.usa · Group Profile
Author: Sarah CzepielSarah Czepiel Date: Aug 21, 2008 12:29
On 20 Aug 2008 18:59:42 -0700, Jose Gaspar newsguy.com> wrote:
:>In article , Porsche Monkey For Life says...
:>>
:>>On the long hot summer day of Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:05:53 -0700, Jose Gaspar
:>>dribbled:
:>>> Kadaitcha Man says...
:>>>>ZapRatz, ye grizzled knotty-pated fool, here comes those I have done good
:>>>>to against my will, ye incited:
:>>>>
:>>>>> What the fuck is your major malfunction? sara cesspool has repeatedly
:>>>>> stated, erroneously, that I am three or more other people or that I
:>>>>> have used numerous internet identities I have never used.
:>>>>
:>>>>Allow me to illustrate why Sara is correct about you:
:>>>>
:>>>>Do you carry on conversations with yourself in public?
:>>>>
:>>>>I assume not. Correct if me if you do actually carry on conversations
:>>>>with yourself in public.
:>>>>
:>>>>You, posting as "ZapRat", continually post endless screed about Sara.
:>>>>
:>>>>"Jose Gaspar" also continually posts endless screed about Sara.
:>>>>
:>>>>Despite you and Gaspar displaying maniacal dislike to the point of
:>>>>near-hatred for Sara, and despite posting untold kilobytes of screed
:>>>>between you about her, I haven't yet seen you and Gaspar cuddling up to
:>>>>each other to mock her in the same manner that you are mocking her now.
:>>>>
:>>>>That's a significant point.
:>>>>
:>>>>I surmise that the reason you don't hold discussions with your
:>>>>sockpuppets is because doing such a thing is an extremely difficult act
:>>>>to pull off, even partially successfully. You know full that you don't
:>>>>have the skills to do it and you know that would get caught out if you
:>>>>tried it so you ignore your sockpuppets and hope nobody will notice.
:>>>>
:>>>>You see, given the amount of screed you and Gaspar pump out about sara,
:>>>>it's only reasonable to expect that the two of you would at least "talk
:>>>>about her behind her back", if such a thing were truly possible on
:>>>>usenet, but you don't.
:>>>>
:>>>>Therefore I am forced to conclude that it is exceedingly likely that you
:>>>>and Gaspar are one and the same poster.
:>>>>
:>>>>Don't bother arguing against any of that. Just post google groups links
:>>>>to threads where you and Gaspar have carried on a conversation with each
:>>>>other that did not involve mere one-off or occasional catty remarks about
:>>>>Sara.
:>>>
:>>> Obviously ZapRatz does not want to be misidentified as anyone other than
:>>> himself and he has that right, IMHO.
:>>>
:>>> Then you come along and make accusations that are not true and then demand
:>>> that ZapRatz prove you wrong. I don't B/C with ZapRatz but I do admire
:>>> his posts and he is well respected in AO.
:>>>
:>>> *IF* you want to know the truth you can go back a few years and find that
:>>> Sarah Czepiel attacked me out of the blue. I never knew who in the fuck
:>>> she was. ZapRatz may have known; he can answer that. More recently Sarah
:>>> Czepiel accused me of being ZapRatz even though ZapRatz had nothing to do
:>>> with Sarah Czepiel at the time. By doing so she infuriated ZapRatz.
:>>> Sarah Czepiel has been flaming for at least 12 years and has an endless
:>>> list of those who have hated her.
:>>
:>>Well, damn. I only have maybe a couple dozen on my list,
:>>perhaps as many of thirty. I need to try harder.
:>>
:>>> She has made some 27,000 posts in the
:>>> past 12 years. The many who have disliked her have come and gone over the
:>>> years and what you are seeing right now is two of those people, but we are
:>>> not the same person. You would have not even thought that we were the
:>>> same person if it hadn't been suggested to you by some coneheads.
:>>
:>>You and "Team Karen", and alternately, you and "Zapratz", have very
:>>similar tones. Given the way you defend either Karen or Silly Billy (or
:>>both), you must be each of them, at various times -- a weak-minded pair of
:>>stalking cowards who think posting outer filth is the height of flaming,
:>>and that usenet is the same thing as Real Life.
:>
:>Your point is?
:>
:>>You are the very scum of
:>>usenet, both of you, and John, Ken, and Sarah cannot possibly hope to
:>>ruin your reps as much you deserve, simply because this _isn't_ real
:>>life.
:>
:>How in the fucking hell can PortaPirate John/ Ken/ or Sarah ruin my reputation?
:>
:>You don't get it, do you?
Oh the irony.....
:>Whatever you do - don't reply to ANTU... and don't bring any more of your filth
:>into ANTU... We don't want your kind in ANTU...
That's right, no flaming in antu.
Do you need the clue tags, Gasbag?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
