In article <07jma4t7j70tt0h35egb2rf5v29e78ni9t@
4ax.com>, ZapRatz says...
>
>On 19 Aug 2008 10:45:42 -0700, Jose Gaspar newsguy.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article , Snarky says...
>>>
>>>On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:16:43 -0700, Jose Gaspar wrote these lies, denials,
>>>arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>>>> In article , Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion says...
>>>>>On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:54:39 -0500, ZapRatz attempted to confuse the
>>>>>issue further by squeaking:
>>>>>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:42:11 GMT, Snarky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:09:35 -0400, Sarah Czepiel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>But if you don't want to admit this was Karen then I can pass all the
>>>>>>>>>blame on to you Billy. I understand it must be difficult finding
>>>>>>>>>the Florida Keys on a map in your Wisconsin hovel. Karen is making
>>>>>>>>>you look like a dumbass sharing this nym with her.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Your capitulation on being a fraud named Jose Gaspar is accepted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:06:59 -0500, ZapRatz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Very cwever little
>>>>>trick, that. Very kooky, too, as well as dishonest. You, Bill Cmelak, are
>>>>>nothing but a lying little whiner, who can't handle being flamed on a
>>>>>fucking flame group like antU.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're funny.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The only person making someone do something is... you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You're either Cmelak or Anderson, because only Cmelak and Anderson care
>>>>>>>about the reputations of Cmelak and Anderson, and think that their reps
>>>>>>>on usenet are equivalent to their real-life reps. 'Member what you said
>>>>>>>about "defending yourself"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't deny that I am Bill Cmelak.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh, goody, Mr. Screeder. It's nice to have these things settled.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Furthermore, I continue to refute the numerous irrational and illogical
>>>>>> claims that I am Anderson or that I share nyms or accounts with that
>>>>>> person or anyone else. I post to unsent on behalf of no one but myself.
>>>>>
>>>>>Some posts from "Jose Gaspar" read more like your voice, and others like
>>>>>hers. Posts in this thread, sent to AUK, that is. Not without reason, it
>>>>>would appear.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are doing one hell of a job showcasing the mental infirmities of
>>>>>>>> Sarah Czepiel, a babbling idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I believe you spent time in Florida. That is undoubtedly where your
>>>>>>>> mind jumped the shark.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I believe you have never spent time in Florida (not south of
>>>>>>>Jacksonville, anyway), Karen. Cmelak, you might have, I don't know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I most certainly have. During one trip, I traveled the Atlantic coast
>>>>>> from Virginia down to Key West and back up the Gulf Coast to
>>>>>> Tallahassee where my uncle lived and died.
>>>>>
>>>>>Then that was you posting as Gaspar, after Karen posting as same, or else
>>>>>you blundered like someone who was only pretending, and got caught.
>>>>>Either way, it seems you're quite fucked, m'laddie. Either you lie about
>>>>>not sharing a stinky sock with Karen (if she made the claim), or you lie
>>>>>about having been to Florida. Which is it?
>>>>
>>>> Zapratz has never posted as Jose Gaspar.
>>>
>>>My attribution line is most appropriate, here, Cmelak (or Anderson, since
>>>you two share the nym). To wit:
>>>
>>>On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:16:43 -0700, Jose Gaspar wrote these lies, denials,
>>>arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations:
>>>
>>>"Jose Gaspar" is a non-existent person. Bill Cmelak and Karen K. Anderson
>>>both exist, but only as sockpuppets like "Zapratz", "Jose Gaspar", and
>>>"Team Karen". The first of those is, AFAICT, only Cmelak, and the last,
>>>only Anderson (as is "Lumpy"), while you both play "Jose".
>>
>>You are saying that *I* wrote that?
>>
>>I don't think so...
>>
>
>What s/he said, since I'm not Mister Mxyzptlk and don't care to
>decipher that mumbo jumbo.
Must have been the refried beans...