>Hail Eris! On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:56:28 -0500, ZapRatz sang, "If I were a
>Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, bloody, bloody,
>blub...", and then randomly typed out:

>> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:55:20 GMT, The Demon of Mockery & Silliness wrote:

>>>Hail Eris! On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:51:47 -0500, ZapRatz sang, "If I were a
>>>Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, bloody,
>>>bloody, blub...", and then randomly typed out:

>>>> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:35:23 GMT, Porsche Monkey For Life wrote:

>>>>>On the long hot summer day of Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:05:53 -0700, Jose
>>>>>Gaspar dribbled:

>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man says...

>>>>>>>ZapRatz, ye grizzled knotty-pated fool, here comes those I have done
>>>>>>>good to against my will, ye incited:
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> What the fuck is your major malfunction? sara cesspool has
>>>>>>>> repeatedly stated, erroneously, that I am three or more other
>>>>>>>> people or that I have used numerous internet identities I have
>>>>>>>> never used.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Allow me to illustrate why Sara is correct about you:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Do you carry on conversations with yourself in public?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I assume not. Correct if me if you do actually carry on conversations
>>>>>>>with yourself in public.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You, posting as "ZapRat", continually post endless screed about Sara.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Jose Gaspar" also continually posts endless screed about Sara.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Despite you and Gaspar displaying maniacal dislike to the point of
>>>>>>>near-hatred for Sara, and despite posting untold kilobytes of screed
>>>>>>>between you about her, I haven't yet seen you and Gaspar cuddling up
>>>>>>>to each other to mock her in the same manner that you are mocking her
>>>>>>>now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's a significant point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I surmise that the reason you don't hold discussions with your
>>>>>>>sockpuppets is because doing such a thing is an extremely difficult
>>>>>>>act to pull off, even partially successfully. You know full that you
>>>>>>>don't have the skills to do it and you know that would get caught out
>>>>>>>if you tried it so you ignore your sockpuppets and hope nobody will
>>>>>>>notice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You see, given the amount of screed you and Gaspar pump out about
>>>>>>>sara, it's only reasonable to expect that the two of you would at
>>>>>>>least "talk about her behind her back", if such a thing were truly
>>>>>>>possible on usenet, but you don't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Therefore I am forced to conclude that it is exceedingly likely that
>>>>>>>you and Gaspar are one and the same poster.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Don't bother arguing against any of that. Just post google groups
>>>>>>>links to threads where you and Gaspar have carried on a conversation
>>>>>>>with each other that did not involve mere one-off or occasional catty
>>>>>>>remarks about Sara.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously ZapRatz does not want to be misidentified as anyone other
>>>>>> than himself and he has that right, IMHO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you come along and make accusations that are not true and then
>>>>>> demand that ZapRatz prove you wrong. I don't B/C with ZapRatz but I
>>>>>> do admire his posts and he is well respected in AO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *IF* you want to know the truth you can go back a few years and find
>>>>>> that Sarah Czepiel attacked me out of the blue. I never knew who in
>>>>>> the fuck she was. ZapRatz may have known; he can answer that. More
>>>>>> recently Sarah Czepiel accused me of being ZapRatz even though
>>>>>> ZapRatz had nothing to do with Sarah Czepiel at the time. By doing so
>>>>>> she infuriated ZapRatz. Sarah Czepiel has been flaming for at least
>>>>>> 12 years and has an endless list of those who have hated her.

>>>>>
>>>>>Well, damn. I only have maybe a couple dozen on my list,
>>>>>perhaps as many of thirty. I need to try harder.
>>>>>

>>>>>> She has made some 27,000 posts in the past 12 years. The many who
>>>>>> have disliked her have come and gone over the years and what you are
>>>>>> seeing right now is two of those people, but we are not the same
>>>>>> person. You would have not even thought that we were the same person
>>>>>> if it hadn't been suggested to you by some coneheads.

>>>>>
>>>>>You and "Team Karen", and alternately, you and "Zapratz", have very
>>>>>similar tones. Given the way you defend either Karen or Silly Billy (or
>>>>>both), you must be each of them, at various times -- a weak-minded pair
>>>>>of stalking cowards who think posting outer filth is the height of
>>>>>flaming, and that usenet is the same thing as Real Life. You are the
>>>>>very scum of usenet, both of you, and John, Ken, and Sarah cannot
>>>>>possibly hope to ruin your reps as much you deserve, simply because
>>>>>this _isn't_ real life.

>>>>
>>>> You're funny.
>>>>
>>>> Did you pay the chickenshit coyotes, sara cesspool and fat-fuck
>>>> ken-fool, the bounty due them for their role as chickenshit coyotes
>>>> transporting foreigners across the border into your k00k00-burrow?

>>>
>>>They're on salary for me. Paid once per lifetime.

>>
>> That's quite an investment. I'm sure they'll serve you well considering
>> their propensity to malign anyone and everyone dovetails so tightly with
>> both the intent and focus of your lamer flame newsgroup and
>> secret-handshake antisocial club.

>
>Awwwww. Now that you realise AUK doesn't care about your "reputation",
>we're(tinw) lamers and a "secret-handshake antisocial club".

>

>>>> The only difference between this place and the Titanic is that the
>>>> Titanic had a band.

>>>
>>>"This" place? But you're posting directly to AUK only. Maybe you need
>>>that corrected?

>>
>> Since when are you an arbiter of propriety? Subversion is not yours alone.

>
>But I thought you wanted ANTU "flooded"! Whassamatta, change your mind?