> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:55:20 GMT, The Demon of Mockery & Silliness wrote:

>>Hail Eris! On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:51:47 -0500, ZapRatz sang, "If I were a
>>Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, bloody,
>>bloody, blub...", and then randomly typed out:

>>> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:35:23 GMT, Porsche Monkey For Life wrote:

>>>>On the long hot summer day of Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:05:53 -0700, Jose
>>>>Gaspar dribbled:

>>>>> Kadaitcha Man says...

>>>>>>ZapRatz, ye grizzled knotty-pated fool, here comes those I have done
>>>>>>good to against my will, ye incited:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> What the fuck is your major malfunction? sara cesspool has
>>>>>>> repeatedly stated, erroneously, that I am three or more other
>>>>>>> people or that I have used numerous internet identities I have
>>>>>>> never used.

>>>>>>
>>>>>>Allow me to illustrate why Sara is correct about you:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Do you carry on conversations with yourself in public?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I assume not. Correct if me if you do actually carry on conversations
>>>>>>with yourself in public.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You, posting as "ZapRat", continually post endless screed about Sara.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Jose Gaspar" also continually posts endless screed about Sara.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Despite you and Gaspar displaying maniacal dislike to the point of
>>>>>>near-hatred for Sara, and despite posting untold kilobytes of screed
>>>>>>between you about her, I haven't yet seen you and Gaspar cuddling up
>>>>>>to each other to mock her in the same manner that you are mocking her
>>>>>>now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's a significant point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I surmise that the reason you don't hold discussions with your
>>>>>>sockpuppets is because doing such a thing is an extremely difficult
>>>>>>act to pull off, even partially successfully. You know full that you
>>>>>>don't have the skills to do it and you know that would get caught out
>>>>>>if you tried it so you ignore your sockpuppets and hope nobody will
>>>>>>notice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You see, given the amount of screed you and Gaspar pump out about
>>>>>>sara, it's only reasonable to expect that the two of you would at
>>>>>>least "talk about her behind her back", if such a thing were truly
>>>>>>possible on usenet, but you don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Therefore I am forced to conclude that it is exceedingly likely that
>>>>>>you and Gaspar are one and the same poster.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Don't bother arguing against any of that. Just post google groups
>>>>>>links to threads where you and Gaspar have carried on a conversation
>>>>>>with each other that did not involve mere one-off or occasional catty
>>>>>>remarks about Sara.

>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously ZapRatz does not want to be misidentified as anyone other
>>>>> than himself and he has that right, IMHO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you come along and make accusations that are not true and then
>>>>> demand that ZapRatz prove you wrong. I don't B/C with ZapRatz but I
>>>>> do admire his posts and he is well respected in AO.
>>>>>
>>>>> *IF* you want to know the truth you can go back a few years and find
>>>>> that Sarah Czepiel attacked me out of the blue. I never knew who in
>>>>> the fuck she was. ZapRatz may have known; he can answer that. More
>>>>> recently Sarah Czepiel accused me of being ZapRatz even though
>>>>> ZapRatz had nothing to do with Sarah Czepiel at the time. By doing so
>>>>> she infuriated ZapRatz. Sarah Czepiel has been flaming for at least
>>>>> 12 years and has an endless list of those who have hated her.

>>>>
>>>>Well, damn. I only have maybe a couple dozen on my list,
>>>>perhaps as many of thirty. I need to try harder.
>>>>

>>>>> She has made some 27,000 posts in the past 12 years. The many who
>>>>> have disliked her have come and gone over the years and what you are
>>>>> seeing right now is two of those people, but we are not the same
>>>>> person. You would have not even thought that we were the same person
>>>>> if it hadn't been suggested to you by some coneheads.

>>>>
>>>>You and "Team Karen", and alternately, you and "Zapratz", have very
>>>>similar tones. Given the way you defend either Karen or Silly Billy (or
>>>>both), you must be each of them, at various times -- a weak-minded pair
>>>>of stalking cowards who think posting outer filth is the height of
>>>>flaming, and that usenet is the same thing as Real Life. You are the
>>>>very scum of usenet, both of you, and John, Ken, and Sarah cannot
>>>>possibly hope to ruin your reps as much you deserve, simply because
>>>>this _isn't_ real life.

>>>
>>> You're funny.
>>>
>>> Did you pay the chickenshit coyotes, sara cesspool and fat-fuck
>>> ken-fool, the bounty due them for their role as chickenshit coyotes
>>> transporting foreigners across the border into your k00k00-burrow?

>>
>>They're on salary for me. Paid once per lifetime.

>
> That's quite an investment. I'm sure they'll serve you well considering
> their propensity to malign anyone and everyone dovetails so tightly with
> both the intent and focus of your lamer flame newsgroup and
> secret-handshake antisocial club.

>>> The only difference between this place and the Titanic is that the
>>> Titanic had a band.

>>
>>"This" place? But you're posting directly to AUK only. Maybe you need
>>that corrected?

>
> Since when are you an arbiter of propriety? Subversion is not yours alone.