>
> "Greg Procter" ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
> news:47C31C53.5EDFE90E@ihug.co.nz...

>> Scout wrote:

>>>
>>> "Greg Procter" ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
>>> news:47C2418C.1F0B02FA@ihug.co.nz...

>>>> Scout wrote:

>>>>>
>>>>> "Greg Procter" ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
>>>>> news:47BB3A32.FC28EEBD@ihug.co.nz...

>>>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" wrote:

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greg Procter ihug.co.nz> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:47B94430.A49D9C10@ihug.co.nz:
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Seth Hammond wrote:

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Rifty" tpg.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:1icg93q.1dvyvdw8z3p3wN%%rifty@tpg.com.au...

>>>>>>>>>> Scout verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> "Rifty" tpg.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:1icf2ly.70hw4s1j5fb4cN%%rifty@tpg.com.au...

>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Travel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought the NIU guy had a shotgun.

>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct - plus another gun. How does that relate to my
>>>>>>>>>>>> comment?
>>>>>>>>>>>> The point wasn't about what this demented bloke had, but
>>>>>>>>>>>> why
>>>>>>>>>>>> someone like him could walk into a gunshop and take one off
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> shelf and go kill people with it - with no regulations
>>>>>>>>>>>> apart
>>>>>>>>>>>> from proving they have a driver's licence.

>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Clearly you don't know the legal requirements then.
>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> I am not against gun ownership. I am against making it easy
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> loonies to get and use them.

>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Once you know the current state of the law then you can hold
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> meaningful discussion about this, until then you are just too
>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant of you chosen subject.

>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They were easy enough for a lunatic to buy himself two guns
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> massacre people. That's all anyone needs to know. Your laws
>>>>>>>>>> clearly
>>>>>>>>>> are weak and fail to protect your citizens. Nowhere else in
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> world do they do the massacre of innocent people in a shooting
>>>>>>>>>> spree so well and so often as in the USA.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why are so many gun freaks over there in the US so aggro?
>>>>>>>>>> Several
>>>>>>>>>> I've seen posting on here shouldn't be allowed to own a
>>>>>>>>>> popgun,
>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>> alone something that fires bullets.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rifty
>>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The question now and always has been is why people go berserk,
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> not what kind of weapon they strike out with. Placing illogical
>>>>>>>>> blame on inanimate objects is one more way of avoiding the
>>>>>>>>> mental
>>>>>>>>> health issues involved.

>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Meanwhile you ignore the fact that numerous yanks lost all their
>>>>>>>> rights in a single incident and many more lost loved ones and
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>> their lives destroyed. Those guns must be real important to you
>>>>>>>> gun-nutters!
>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not as important as they appear to be to you. If this nutter had
>>>>>>> used
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> grenade or a propane bomb, your blithering self wouldn't even be in
>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>> mouthing off about it.

>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, so we're agreed that your penis substitute is more important to
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> than my ongoing rights are to you.

>>>>>
>>>>> So since you consider guns to be a penis substitute what should that
>>>>> tell
>>>>> us
>>>>> when you want to take them away?

>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No.

>>>
>>> It should tell us "No"?
>>>
>>> Ok, I accept that we should not give up our guns because of your penial
>>> fanatasies.

>>
>> That's an endless circle that exists only in your tiny brain.

>
> It's not an endless circle, it's a simple linear function. It only turns
> circular if/when you attempt to change your claims and start trying to tell
> people how we need to restrict, prohibit, control, regulate, ban, or
> otherwise impose additional controls on guns, gun transactions and gun
> owners.