> Scout wrote:

>>
>> "Greg Procter" ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
>> news:47C2418C.1F0B02FA@ihug.co.nz...

>>> Scout wrote:

>>>>
>>>> "Greg Procter" ihug.co.nz> wrote in message
>>>> news:47BB3A32.FC28EEBD@ihug.co.nz...

>>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" wrote:

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greg Procter ihug.co.nz> wrote in
>>>>>> news:47B94430.A49D9C10@ihug.co.nz:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Seth Hammond wrote:

>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Rifty" tpg.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:1icg93q.1dvyvdw8z3p3wN%%rifty@tpg.com.au...

>>>>>>>>> Scout verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> "Rifty" tpg.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:1icf2ly.70hw4s1j5fb4cN%%rifty@tpg.com.au...

>>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Travel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought the NIU guy had a shotgun.

>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Correct - plus another gun. How does that relate to my
>>>>>>>>>>> comment?
>>>>>>>>>>> The point wasn't about what this demented bloke had, but
>>>>>>>>>>> why
>>>>>>>>>>> someone like him could walk into a gunshop and take one off
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> shelf and go kill people with it - with no regulations
>>>>>>>>>>> apart
>>>>>>>>>>> from proving they have a driver's licence.

>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Clearly you don't know the legal requirements then.
>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> I am not against gun ownership. I am against making it easy
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> loonies to get and use them.

>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Once you know the current state of the law then you can hold
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> meaningful discussion about this, until then you are just too
>>>>>>>>>> ignorant of you chosen subject.

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They were easy enough for a lunatic to buy himself two guns
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> massacre people. That's all anyone needs to know. Your laws
>>>>>>>>> clearly
>>>>>>>>> are weak and fail to protect your citizens. Nowhere else in
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> world do they do the massacre of innocent people in a shooting
>>>>>>>>> spree so well and so often as in the USA.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why are so many gun freaks over there in the US so aggro?
>>>>>>>>> Several
>>>>>>>>> I've seen posting on here shouldn't be allowed to own a
>>>>>>>>> popgun,
>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>> alone something that fires bullets.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rifty
>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The question now and always has been is why people go berserk,
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> not what kind of weapon they strike out with. Placing illogical
>>>>>>>> blame on inanimate objects is one more way of avoiding the
>>>>>>>> mental
>>>>>>>> health issues involved.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Meanwhile you ignore the fact that numerous yanks lost all their
>>>>>>> rights in a single incident and many more lost loved ones and
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>> their lives destroyed. Those guns must be real important to you
>>>>>>> gun-nutters!
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not as important as they appear to be to you. If this nutter had
>>>>>> used
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> grenade or a propane bomb, your blithering self wouldn't even be in
>>>>>> here
>>>>>> mouthing off about it.

>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, so we're agreed that your penis substitute is more important to
>>>>> you
>>>>> than my ongoing rights are to you.

>>>>
>>>> So since you consider guns to be a penis substitute what should that
>>>> tell
>>>> us
>>>> when you want to take them away?

>>>
>>>
>>> No.

>>
>> It should tell us "No"?
>>
>> Ok, I accept that we should not give up our guns because of your penial
>> fanatasies.

>
> That's an endless circle that exists only in your tiny brain.