Sarah Czepiel
cox.net> wrote:> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:37:09 -0700, Karen Anderson skanky old whore
> from Bremerton Washington socking as "GodLovesLumpy"
>
wrote:
>>>> Sarah Czepiel
cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who's that pretty young woman sitting on the sofa in the
>>>>>> picture posted today? What became of her? Is she dead now?
>>>>
>>>> Why ask me?
>>>
>>> Because the picture is supposed to be Sarah Czepiel and she looks
>>> like the "hag in the red dress" picture that is also Sarah
>>> Czepiel as well as the wedding
>>> picture of Ken Ehrett and Sarah Czepiel. Am I not replying to
>>> Sarah
>>> Czepiel? If not, who are you?
>
> Who are you?
You know. You always know, don't you? Answer the questions. Don't try to
divert by answering with another question.
>
>>>> Shouldn't you be talking with Bill?
>>>
>>> Bill, who? I haven't talked on the phone to anyone named Bill in
>>> 20 years.
>>>
>>> Why don't you just post a current picture of yourself WITH your
>>> husband, Ken
>>> Ehrett....maybe in front of one of the cars you bought him? Use
>>> the tripod
>>> and timer on the camera. (can't do it, can you? .....you fat
>>> fraud)
>
> Why don't you have someone at the Salvation Army take your picture
> and post it.
> Can't do it can you, you skanky old whore?
Can't do what? I know I can't take just anybody's picture(s) and claim they
are somebody else. That would be YOUR department.
>
>>> And until you post that picture of BOTH of you together -- Ken
>>> and Sarah --
>>> you've not only been SPANKED, but you've had your asses kicked
>>> till they are
>>> as red as gilmer's nose.
>
> And until you post a picture of yourself, your real name, and your
> personal details you're nothing to me or anyone else.
Nobody is anything to you because you aren't a real human being. You are a
usenet hoax. You are not "Sarah Czepiel" and "Ken Ehrett" is repugnant even
to you so he have created a whole new persona for yourself online. The
entire thing is utterly distasteful and repulsive. Like this:
http://www.filecrunch.com/fileDownload.php?sub=15044d1f818acc69a5b36ea5b8248c62&fileId...
You seem to know the *real* names of many people on Usenet....and what do
you do with that information?
>>> Oh...and NO *photo-shopping* for a change.
>
> What's supposed to be photoshopped other than the one from Anthropy
> ?
The last several offerings you have made to this group were PHOTOSHOPPED,
"sarah". You are so lame and obvious it is embarrassing. But since you
aren't a human being you don't feel any emotions
except P O W E R. Right "sarah"?
>
>>> A real picture showing you are who you say you are -- a very
>>> happy and well-adjusted married :>couple.
>
> Let's see a picture of you.
Since you claim to know who EVERYBODY is, then you have thousands of
pictures of who I am, and who Lumpy, Jose, Hoodoo and about 30 other people
are, too. Doesn't that seem odd to you that all these different people with
different writing styles are all one person? Even YOU, the *GREAT KEN
EHRETT* isn't THAT good, eh?
> Prove you're not a crazy old bitch
You'll have to take my word for it, Ken. I am NOT Sarah Czepiel. ;'))
> living in Bremerton Washington.
I don't think she lives in the wonderul Pacific Northwest area. She's stuck
in a hovel with Ken Ehrett in Dumfuck, Maryland....doesn't even have a
garage to keep all her vehicles from depreciating even faster than they
already are.
>
>>> Perhaps you'd like to show your wedding rings on your left hands?
>
> Already been done.
Then let's see them again. Some of us are new here.
Originally posted on a watch forum and then
> on antu over two years ago.
Easy enough for you to find in Google Archives, which you haunt in your
"spare time", and post them right here. Get cracking, Kenny ...
