>In article bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Karen
>says...

>>
>>"Sarah Czepiel" cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:o456c45livn6v21an1srjb560de98l3pnn@4ax.com

>>> On 6 Sep 2008 16:20:38 -0700, Jose Gaspar newsguy.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>

>>>>> In article
>>>>> bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Karen
>>>>> says...

>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sarah Czepiel or Ken Ehrett" cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> And if you have his DD214, that's actionable.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Such as.....?

>>>>>
>>>>> Such as rolling it up and sticking it up Sarah's ass...
>>>>>
>>>>> I've done several FOIA's on wannabes. All is needed are two pieces
>>>>> of information. Complete name and some other info that identifies
>>>>> the vet. We know Ken's name and DOB. That's all that's needed.
>>>>> I suppose Sarah never read "Stolen Valor?"
>>>>>
>>>>> http://foia.navy.mil/foia/requests.asp
>>>>>
>>>>> "'The FOIA allows 'any person' to seek access to 'agency records.'
>>>>> The Navy processes thousands of FOIA requests for a wide variety of
>>>>> information and only in about 10%% of the cases is information
>>>>> denied.'"

>>>
>>> Dumbass, FOIA doesn't give you access to anyone's DD214.
>>>
>>> Details. It's always the details which you posers get wrong.

>>
>>
>>What are you so ashamed of that is exposed by the DD214 ??
>>
>>I thought you were so proud of Ken's Navy service....I'm sure we'd never
>>have won the war without him....LOL
>>
>>When have YOU ever gotten a detail about anything or anybody correct?
>>You don't even know who you are talking to.
>>
>>Karen

>
>I love how Sarah squirms. She said if Lumpy had Ken's DD-214, that was
>'actionable.' Fat chance!