Unfixed
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
Search only in:
alt.nuke.the.usa
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
Group Profile...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 56 articles for 0.000 sec
Re: Costello slams Howard's 'Legacy" - 'Bungled republic, reconciliation and Hansonism'     

Author: Benway
Date: Sep 9, 2008 21:06

... your income, and the Howard/Costello inflation reduces your buying power, and the Howard/Costello rent explosion forces you onto the street? I'm sure Rudd took one look at the figures, and put the whole mess into the "Too Hard" basket. Why should he try to fix the unfixable? Face facts, many of you are going to go out backwards because you trusted loony old John. *************
Show full article (9.29Kb) · Show article thread
Re: What does 'run' do in cperl-mode?     

Author: Xah
Date: Jul 30, 2008 10:32

... “M-” is stands for Meta and is by default mapped to the Alt key. (to quip the hardcore geeker: if one find this confusing, perhaps he isn't fit to code elisp.) Lisp itself has lots of unfixable baggage in the key macro syntax. For example, there's also Hyper, Super, with syntax “H-” and “s-”. These keys doesn't exist today (but one can bind them just like Meta, of course). Further, ...
Show full article (26.91Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Happy July 14th!     

Author: Kadaitcha Man
Date: Jul 9, 2008 00:32

Dave Witmarsh, ye repulsive spotted and inconstant man, whose horrible image doth unfix my hair and make my seated heart knock at my ribs, ye exudated: On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:51:11 -0400, Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:23:14 +1200, Greg Procter <procter@ihug.co.nz> wrote: :>You get barnacles on your buttocks? You're spending too much time ...
Show full article (0.90Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Binding name     

Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: May 30, 2008 23:45

"FX" <coudert@alussinan.org> wrote in message news:g18gn2$a1j$1@nef.ens.fr... It would have been easy for the mingw 64 crew to discover the unfixed failures as well. They have a different problem than you: they know nada about Fortran :) Playing around some more with NightStrike's builds: there was a build entitled mingw-w64-bin_x86-64-mingw_20080528.zip that doesn't work ...
Show full article (3.59Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Binding name     

Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: May 24, 2008 03:34

"FX" <coudert@alussinan.org> wrote in message news:g18gn2$a1j$1@nef.ens.fr... It would have been easy for the mingw 64 crew to discover the unfixed failures as well. They have a different problem than you: they know nada about Fortran :) So which of us are the leading blind, and which the following? I tried playing around with mingw-w64-bin_x86_64-mingw_20080507.zip some ...
Show full article (10.73Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Binding name     

Author: FX
Date: May 24, 2008 00:39

> It would have been easy for the mingw 64 crew to discover the unfixed failures as well. They have a different problem than you: they know nada about Fortran :) -- FX
Show full article (0.17Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Binding name     

Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: May 23, 2008 20:18

... have it generate one of those as well as collection.bat so you could tell at a glance which fail on your preferred OS. It would have been easy for the mingw 64 crew to discover the unfixed failures as well. Obviously it is not possible for me to do so because a compiler with said fixes is not available at any location I can think of. -- write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6....
Show full article (1.35Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?     

Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: May 6, 2008 14:46

"FX" <coudert@alussinan.org> wrote in message news:fvqh4r$1n5d$1@nef.ens.fr... Is there some way to 'unfix' PR323 so that Win64 works like gawd & Billy Kahan intended? If you expect any kind of answer, you need to provide a clear, self-contained question. C:\gfortran\clf\kahan>type finit.s .text .globl _xfinit_ .def _xfinit_; .scl 2; .type...
Show full article (3.71Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?     

Author: FX
Date: May 6, 2008 14:04

> Is there some way to 'unfix' PR323 so that Win64 works like gawd & Billy Kahan intended? If you expect any kind of answer, you need to provide a clear, self-contained question. -- FX
Show full article (0.19Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Are f.p. manipulation functions only used in initialization?     

Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: May 6, 2008 13:37

...p. control word. It's http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 and the 100 idiots who want PR323 'fixed' seem to have won out over sanity on Win64 unlike all other platforms. Is there some way to 'unfix' PR323 so that Win64 works like gawd & Billy Kahan intended? -- write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6.5794487871554595D-85, & 6.0134700243160014d-154/),(/'x'/)); end
Show full article (0.56Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · next