|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: SteveLSteveL
Date: Jun 8, 2010 12:12
On Sun, 30 May 2010 21:24:09 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
comcast.net> wrote:
>Doug Says: For some pathetic reason Nigel Brooks believes his
>bluffing, huffing, puffing and stumbling legal advice bullshit
I'll take the legal opinion of someone with 20+ years experience as a
criminal investigator over that of a layman who doesn't understand the
concept of evidence any day.
Doug. You think referring to previous examples of yourself making an
an accusation are "evidence" in support of a current accusation!
That's worse than stupid. It's deranged.
> will
>deter me from what I know I must do to defend myself from his cons and
>fraud - Brooks is fucking nuts.
To my knowledge Nigel has never won even won a kook award. You are up
in double figures. And you display obvious cognitive defects - re
concept of evidence.
> NOTHING stops me - ask anyone that
>knows me.
Nobody doubts that you are insanely stubborn.
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: DGVREIMANDGVREIMAN
Date: Jun 7, 2010 23:25
VETERAN DENIGRATION - OBESE SLUGS
TOM RAU DENIED STATING THE FOLLOWING AND DEMANDED THAT I POST PROOF -
HERE IT IS:
http://tinyurl.com/22kwlov Tom Rau's More Obese Slug defamation.
-Dai Uy sends (Tom Rau)
1. Rau went on to say:
2. "If you are a fat, tobacco smoking, drunk, sitting on a motorised
(sic)
flag bedecked scooter, sucking VA oxygen, and telling war stories in
the lobby of the VA clinic to others just like you and drawing 100%%.
("fuckin' agent orange, man") You know what I'm talking about."
Tom Rau
Rau went on to say:
3. "There are more comments, but they tend to agree with the point of
view that Nick and I share regarding phonies, wannabes, and whiners
clogging the VA system and preventing deserving veterans from getting
the assistance they've earned and deserve. Some vets claiming Agent
Orange caused their type II diabetes are "whiners and manipulators."
Tom Rau
|
| Show full article (4.97Kb) |
|
| |
2 Comments |
|
|
Author: DGVREIMANDGVREIMAN
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:18
Tom Rau asked me to post the following in which he said the following
about Agent Orange suffering Vets: This is one of many.
TOM RAU DENIGRATING VIETNAM VETS - AGAIN
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all
of my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an
editorial on contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in...
|
| Show full article (23.59Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: tankfixertankfixer
Date: Jun 1, 2010 07:40
In article <69g6069j922cvuf2d9cfk3tjuijs0c1on9@ 4ax.com>, MAC ---NoSPAM-
Today-xyz@NoSpamToday-abc.zoo says... > On Sun, 30 May 2010 21:19:30 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
> comcast.net> wrote:
>
> When does your case go to Court?
> -Mac, the Medic
>
>
They arraigned Doug already ?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: cop welfarecop welfare
Date: Jun 1, 2010 05:13
On May 30, 3:43 pm, "DGVREIMAN" comcast.net> wrote:> "Mac the Medic" hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:r64uv59hlcjhglv9vfhos6mb1jfonlnh5h@4ax.com...
>>> Nigel listen up.
>
>> - Mac, the medic
>
> Doug Says: I doubt if Nigel will listen up, nor will Pepperoni, nor
> will many other members of the gang that have profusly lied about
> their military service on USENET. But then, USENET is not meant to be
> some kind of " resume statement" it is meant to be bullshit, and if
> you want to know what is true and what is not, you need to ask the
> author for specifics and confirmations.
>
> As just one example; I asked Nigel Brooks if it was true he was
> released from Active Duty on January 13, 1968, which contradicts his
> claims of participating in the 1968 Tet offensive on a reactionary
> force, and receiving a campaign medal for doing so. I asked Brooks if
> he wanted me to scan and post the statement from the National
> Personnel Records Center that states unequivably that Nigel N. Brooks ...
|
| Show full article (8.73Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: DGVREIMANDGVREIMAN
Date: Jun 1, 2010 03:58
"Brooks - "Here In Texas I shoot the SOB."
My Standard disclaimer applies to this post, all of my past and future
posts as well. If you have not read any of my THOUSANDS of disclaimer
postings in which I state clearly how I will use USENET then please
read my disclaimer at
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.war.vietnam/msg/378d2eb3d
55bf6a8?hl=en
or at
http://tinyurl.com/mggo9k
http://tinyurl.com/299nrjf Nigel Brooks says above "In Texas I shoot
the SOB." Brooks is clearly admitting that as a law enforcement
person (only a southern border custom worker in fact - no wonder) he
murdered people that he believed were acting strangely.
I for one would like to know the names of the custom cases Nigel
Brooks worked on for the custom service and the names of all those
involved in those cases that were murdered.
The "plain reading" of what Nigel Brooks said in the post above is
that he has killed people in Texas that he thought were acting
strangely. "I shoot the SOB" clearly states that Brooks, acting alone...
|
| Show full article (3.23Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: dinodino
Date: Jun 1, 2010 03:48
In article 4ax.com>, Markie Poo says...>
>
>We will always have pretenders, such as
You.
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Tom PotterTom Potter
Date: May 14, 2010 09:32
**Intelligent beings** would develop transmitters and receivers,
and come to understand modulation and digital communications,
and they would eventually utilize digital communications extensively.
As codes with good correlation properties
are **essential** to effective and efficient digital communications,
no doubt their transmissions would use
Barker and Gold code sequences,
as there are only a few codes that have
good correlation properties.
The best way to detect intelligent civilizations
is to auto-correlate signals using these **few** code sequences.
Advance civilizations would also use the
most effective compression algorithms,
and their signals could be decoded
by using the best compression algorithms.
If you want to detect **intelligent life**,
and find out what they are interested in,
you should:
|
| Show full article (1.97Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
