Re: OT: Mars ice caps melting - Bush to blame
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.music.pearl-jam only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: OT: Mars ice caps melting - Bush to blame         

Group: alt.music.pearl-jam · Group Profile
Author: Evolution
Date: Jan 2, 2007 13:00

This *opinion* is so full of errors, it's laughable. The writer talks
about some scenes from the movie as though he'd seen it. Then he makes
points which are directly addressed in the movie, so obviously, he hasn't.

I decided for the hell of it to look at one claim; chose the claim that
according to the wildlife fund, polar bear populations are increasing.
What a joke!
http://www.worldwildlife.org/polarbears/

"As the world's largest terrestrial carnivore, the polar bear is the
king of the great white north. It might come as a surprise then that
this majestic species faces an uncertain future: Climate change is
causing the disappearance of sea ice from which polar bears hunt their
prey. Research funded by WWF found that with less time on the ice to
hunt for food and store it leaves polar bears hungry and hinders
reproduction. If current climate trends continue unabated, polar bears
could become extinct by the end of this century."

I suspect the rest of his "facts" are equally ridiculous.

Laurie

Dirk Diggler wrote:
> Is there a Santa Claus?
> That was little Virginia's question, which served as the headline for
> Francis Church's column in the New York Sun over a hundred years ago.
> Unfortunately, this year, there's a question of whether Santa has a home to
> return to, what with global warming threatening the polar ice cap under
> Santa's home.
>
> Although Al Gore didn't specifically mention Santa in his inflammatory
> documercial, "An Inconvenient Truth" (now on DVD), the threat was obvious.
> But before we speculate on Santa's fate, let's examine Al Gore's sincerity
> in the movie and see if he's worthy of our trust: He introduces himself (and
> his real agenda) with "I used to be the next president of the United
> States."
>
> To make sure we heard him, lest we miss his rabble-rousing call to arms, he
> brings up the 2000 election a second time. Such comments were, predictably,
> warmly received by an audience which had the exact look and demeanor of the
> peanut gallery in an infomercial. He tries to put his childhood spent being
> raised in a D.C. hotel in a positive light, so that we might actually
> believe that he's not a limousine liberal.
>
> He states, "Bipartisanship brought down the USSR." Besides being totally
> irrelevant, it's also untrue. Reagan's refusal to appease the Soviets, along
> with the strength of capitalism and the inherent flaws of communism, are
> what brought the Soviets down.
>
> Perhaps the worst instance of emotional manipulation in the movie (besides
> the global warming issue itself), was the shameless exploitation of the
> death of his sister, Nancy, in 1984 to smoking-related cancer - which is as
> irrelevant in the movie as it was when he used it in his campaign speeches.
>
> According to the book, "Al Gore: A User's Manual," by St. Clair and
> Cockburn, Gore continued to take "Big Tobacco" money and government
> subsidies for the tobacco he continued to grow on his farm for seven years
> after her death. So, we are essentially asked to believe Mr. "I Invented the
> Internet" telling us that mankind is causing global warming through the
> greenhouse effect, resulting in the melting of the polar ice caps and rising
> sea levels.
>
> Listing all the arguments against Gore's "science" is beyond the limited
> space here, but I will pass on a few points, some from two outstanding
> responses to Gore's movie (listed below**), printed in the Wall Street
> Journal. Yes, carbon dioxide levels have risen, but CO2 is not a pollutant,
> and it's very much in doubt whether it's causing global warming as he
> asserts.
>
> If we are indeed experiencing a period of global warming, why shouldn't we
> attribute it to the same reason that caused the Earth to undergo such
> periods before, increased solar output? Scientists disagree on the degree,
> if any, to which warming can be blamed on man, or what the results of such
> warming might be. But even news of an upcoming U.N. report says that the
> U.N. will downgrade the effect of man's impact on global warming by 25
> percent.
>
> Given the source, you can believe that estimate's on the low side. The
> Arctic does appear to be warming in places, but on Greenland it's the growth
> of its icecap which is causing greater production of icebergs at its coasts,
> rather than global warming, as Gore claims.
>
> Also, according to the World Wildlife Fund, among the distinct polar bear
> populations, two are growing in areas where temperatures have risen; ten are
> stable; and two are decreasing in areas where air temperatures have actually
> fallen.
>
> The journal "Nature" published findings that Antarctica, overall, is
> actually cooling. And NASA has reported that Mars has been warming due to
> solar activity for the last 100 years, and that the Martian polar ice caps
> have been shrinking at "a prodigious rate" since 1978.
>
> So yes, Virginia, there is still a Santa Claus, but he's just going to have
> to adjust to an inconvenient truth and relocate to the South Pole for a
> while.
>
>
> **"Don't Believe the Hype", June, 2,
> 2006-http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597; "Don't Be Very
> Worried", May 23, 2006-
> http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pdupont/?id=110008416
>
>
> Mahlon Marr lives in Byron and can be reached at
> thepainefultruth@wmconnect.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ice caps melting on Earth - global warming...
>
> Ice caps melting on Mars - couldn't be global warming. Crap - there goes
> Gore's argument... Oh well - more liberal catch-22's...
>
> DD
>
>
7 Comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!