| Re: Second Amendment: (Try again) |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.misc.friends · Group Profile
Author: N KesslerN Kessler Date: Sep 19, 2008 21:33
Mikals13 wrote:
> "N Kessler" hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gb1k3s$ta2$1@aioe.org...>> Gil J wrote:
>>> "Gil J" wrote in message
>>> news:nP6dnfAZq7TQg1DVnZ2dnUVZ_qPinZ2d@insightbb.com...>>>> "Gil J" wrote in message
>>>> news:nqadnZ769PWpjlDVnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@insightbb.com...>>>>> PUT YOURSELF IN HER POSITION..WILL MAKE YOU THINK!!!
>>>> Sorry, the link didn't send and i've deleted it.
>>>> Gil
>> I can't wait till the legislatures have enough sense to repeal the 2nd
>> amendment. If guns were restricted, that man couldn't have shot anyone.
>
> Your right.... he would have beaten them to death with a baseball bat.... Or
> stabbed them to death.... Try learning a little of what the rest of the
> world is going thru.... Ask the Aussies how they feel about gun control....
> ask them about thier crime rate.... ask them about thier murder rate....
>
> Crime is caused by people, murder is caused by people.... only one time in
> history that I know of was the gun the bad guy.... and that was at the end
> of WWII where a jap was killed during the time of removing a dead body from
> a downed bomber....
>
>
>
Yes, but with any weapon that's a blunt object, that man would've been
stopped. A man with a gun could shoot ten people coming after him. With
a baseball bat or knife he could've been stopped. Besides, I'm not
talking about an all out ban, but rather more strict control.
| 
