|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: pjmutnickpjmutnick Date: Dec 30, 2007 14:29
On Dec 30, 2:02Â pm, userjn...@ aol.com wrote: >> Last message from John Jones account, which was banned:
>
>
>> First message from new account of John Jones: �userjn...@ aol.com>
>
>> This is same person with new account, as can be seen from the
>> signature on this message:
>
> ...
|
| Show full article (4.20Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MarshallMarshall Date: Dec 30, 2007 15:25
>
> I think you will find that it is not a matter of vox populi. At
> least, it should not be. In our society, the rights of minorities are
> protected.
Agreed. Everyone should be allowed to say anything,
however we do not generally recognize the right to
say it anywhere. For example, on usenet it is generally
considered important to stay on-topic. This is why
you run in to trouble. Posting your religious ideas to
the sci.logic newsgroup is off-topic. It is not as bas as
yelling fire in a crowded theater where no fire exists,
but it is still inappropriate.
Also, extreme repetition becomes spam and hence
abuse at some point. Of your many thousands of
messages this month, how many distinct ones are
there? Like, five or so?
> A gang of redneck thugs do not deserve to silence a
> serious scholar such as myself.
|
| Show full article (1.32Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: pjmutnickpjmutnick Date: Dec 30, 2007 16:44
On Dec 30, 3:25Â pm, Marshall gmail.com> wrote:>> I think you will find that it is not a matter of vox populi. Â At
>> least, it should not be. In our society, the rights of minorities are
>> protected.
>
> Agreed. Everyone should be allowed to say anything,
> however we do not generally recognize the right to
> say it anywhere. For example, on usenet it is generally
> considered important to stay on-topic. This is why
> you run in to trouble. Posting your religious ideas to
> the sci.logic newsgroup is off-topic. It is not as bas as
> yelling fire in a crowded theater where no fire exists,
> but it is still inappropriate.
>
> Also, extreme repetition becomes spam and hence
> abuse at some point. Of your many thousands of ...
|
| Show full article (2.41Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MarshallMarshall Date: Dec 30, 2007 18:12
>
> The real point is that you have not even read my post.
I already told you I read some of it.
> You are reacting out of your own hatred and bigotry.
> There is no third possibility.
What, a genius and an original thinker can't imagine more
than two possibilities? What if I got bored? What if the dog
chewed through the power cable before I could finish reading?
What if the reality is that you really *are* off topic and
uninteresting to those interested in logic?
> You doubt that I am a scholar,
I have no opinion on whether you are a scholar or not.
> but you have not read one page of my
> seventeen page tome, and you have not responded
> at all to the subject matter.
|
| Show full article (2.14Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: pjmutnickpjmutnick Date: Dec 30, 2007 19:03
On Dec 30, 6:12Â pm, Marshall gmail.com> wrote:>> The real point is that you have not even read my post.
>
> I already told you I read some of it.
>
>> You are reacting out of your own hatred and bigotry.
>> There is no third possibility.
>
> What...
|
| Show full article (4.44Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MarshallMarshall Date: Dec 30, 2007 20:30
> On Dec 30, 6:12 pm, Marshall gmail.com> wrote:>>> The real point is that you have not even read my post.
>
> What you did read, you misread. You said:
>
>>> The only thing that caught my eye was where you call Jesus by the
>>> Kryptonian name for Superman, and the Father by the
>>> Kryptonian name for Superman's father. What is up with that?
>
> I never called Jesus Kal-El, nor his Father Jor-El.
Okay. Who is Kal-El then? I mean aside from Superman.
> You completely misconstrued what I did say. You
> are a liar through and through.
Wait, which is it? Was I mistaken or was it deliberate?
Are you saying it was both at the the same time?
|
| Show full article (3.51Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: georgegeorge Date: Dec 31, 2007 12:46
> I am a scientist working on the foundations of quantum theory.
"Foundations"??? Yeah, right.
> You can see my webpage athttp://www.geocities.com/saint7peter,
> where I interview several world
> class scientists, including Basil Hiley, Henry Stapp (my personal
> friend and teacher), and Hans-Peter Duerr (the right hand man to
> Werner Heisenberg). I am interested in religion because it gives
It is hardly possible for "religion" to give anything.
You are overgeneralizing. By definition,
EVERY RELIGION IS DIFFERENT.
> a glimpse into the metaphysical reality
Every DIFFERENT religion is going to give a DIFFERENT glimpse.
If there is in fact 1 metaphysical reality then THE VAST majority
of religionS -- NOT "religion" -- are going to be WRONG in the glimpse
that they give. Only a few of them will happen to give the right
glimpse --
like a stopped clock that is right twice a day.
|
| Show full article (1.11Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: georgegeorge Date: Dec 31, 2007 12:56
> On Dec 30, 6:12 pm, Marshall gmail.com> wrote:>>> The only thing that caught my eye was where you call Jesus by the
>>> Kryptonian name for Superman, and the Father by the
>>> Kryptonian name for Superman's father. What is up with that?
> I never called Jesus Kal-El, nor his Father Jor-El. You completely
> misconstrued what I did say. You are a liar through and through. It
> is a fact that what is translated as "The Mighty God" in Isaiah 9:6 is
> the Jewish name Gibor-El, or Gabriel. That The Everlasting Father and
> The Prince of Peace are Jor-El and Kal-El then follows as a matter of
> logic.
LOGIC?
Look, please, you didn't want to actually be here in the first place.
Just go back to whatever rock you crawled out from under.
You don't need this level of abuse. You will dismiss John Jones
as an amateur by the time this is over.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
