> On May 23, 5:13 pm, Linda Lee hipstargraphics.com> wrote:
>
>
>

>> It's your decision. You'll be among the first to spend a year in jail,
>> and likely when you get out you'll go back for another three years
>> because you can't control your big mouth and your delusions of
>> grandeur.

>
> Linda, once again you demonstrate that you truly have no idea of what
> you speak. Not surprising but your threats do not hold water nor
> should intimidate anyone. You're starting to sound like Steve Winter
> with all the toothless threats. No wonder no one takes you seriously.
>
> You need to pay closer attention to the proposed legislation for you
> not only got the details wrong, what it does cover makes several of
> your posts consistent with "cyber-bullying" as defined in the proposed
> legislation. Several states have such proposed legislation to curb
> cyber-bullying. For example, legislators in Oregon, Washington, New
> Jersey, and Missouri have enacted or proposed such laws.
>
> Furthermore, there are many legal hurdles the laws will eventually
> have to face, one of which are questions concerning jurisdictional
> issues. For example, if someone in a state that has no cyber-bullying
> laws is indicted in a state that does, what is the jurisdictional
> reach of the state that has the law in place. Also what if the person
> who is indicted lives outside the United States. Extradition in both
> instances is unlikely. Furthermore, a question of conflicting laws
> will eventually need to be addressed. For example, if two states have
> cyber-bullying laws and a person in State A is indicted in State B but
> by State A's laws (the state in which the person in question resides)
> what the person posted does not fit the criteria of cyber-bullying
> then which state's laws would be in play?
>
> Linda, just because a law is passed does not automatically make it
> enforceable nor even constitutional. Secondly, in most instances law
> enforcement officials have to routinely deal with whiners like
> yourself you complain whenever someone contradicts them or calls them
> names. Law enforcement officials will turn a deaf ear to the "Chicken
> Littles" out there who come running to them at the drop of a hat
> (Steve Winter's constant complaints to the Durham PD come to mind ---
> they basically put him their kook list and even though they would take
> his reports, they ignored them and placed them in "file 13").
>
> So before you start hollering about a law that may or may not apply,
> please look into the details instead of basing you conclusions and
> assumptions on a 1.5-2 minute news report. I've worked in television
> news for 10 years and know that a reporter who gets their assignment
> in the morning doesn't have enough time by airtime to become an expert
> nor has the time in the few minutes allotted for the report.
>
> In short, Linda, you are speaking and threatening from ignorance.
>
> May God bless,
> Carl
> my website --http://www.nettally.com/saints/
> my blog --http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/