|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: ChuckChuck
Date: Jun 8, 2010 09:13
>
> "Pastor Dave" _gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:tdsm06556mihr479unbdr5gbaeek42p01o@4ax.com...
>
> [snip]
>>> Scripture proves that the hardening was accomplished
>> until the cities were laid waste and the land (Israel) was
>> in complete ruins and houses uninhabited. When did
>> this happen? Well, more than once, did this happen.
>> But the conclusion was in 132AD.
>>
>> The main destruction was in 70AD, when the temple was
>> destroyed and Jerusalem set ablaze.
>
> The moron STILL can't count to three.
>
> The temple "was" destroyed in 587 BC (but you ignore this one). ...
|
| Show full article (4.70Kb) |
|
| |
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Linda LeeLinda Lee
Date: Jun 8, 2010 08:45
On Jun 1, 7:50 pm, "Elder(:)Child" hotmail.com> wrote:> On Jun 1, 3:43 pm,QadoshStephanos wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:08:56 -0700 (PDT), "Elder(:)Child"
>
>>>On May 31, 3:32 pm,QadoshStephanos
>>>wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 14:44:03 -0700 (PDT), "Elder(:)Child"
>
>>>>>On May 31, 2:28 pm,QadoshStephanos
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 30 May 2010 09:47:56 -0700 (PDT), "Elder(:)Child"
>
>>>>>> hotmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>The 1st Day of Creation.
> ...
|
| Show full article (5.64Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Seon FergusonSeon Ferguson
Date: Jun 8, 2010 08:32
>
> "Seon Ferguson" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:a_idne7A5_VuU5fRnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>>> I'll look it up. Now that I accepted the Resurrection I have even more
>> questions.
>
> LOL
>
> Your "accepting the resurrection" is irrelevant.
>
> EVERYONE will be resurrected; it's where they're going AFTER that matters.
>
Well I guess I don't believe that. I believe when our bodies are dead that's
it, they will never be Resurrected. It's our immortal souls, our true
selves, that live on.
|
| Show full article (1.18Kb) |
|
3 Comments |
|
|
Author: ChuckChuck
Date: Jun 8, 2010 08:28
"Mike" sirus.com> wrote in message
news:55790b30-42b1-4bcf-b4f5-9bcd7736365b@e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 7, 9:10 am, "Ike E 5/21/2010" gmail.com>
wrote:> "Pastor Dave" _gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8bsm06prg95jnmdr3lm2b4cfodq873jje4@4ax.com...
>
>
>>> Regardless of what anyone wants to claim, what I say
>> in this message about what evolution teaches, is indeed
>> what it teaches.
>
> LOL
>
> The Bible taught evolution (as distinct from the creation of Adam) all
> along, moron.
>
> Ike ...
|
| Show full article (8.06Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: SuzanneSuzanne
Date: Jun 8, 2010 07:43
On Jun 7, 4:23 am, "I" homeinmystudy00000000041.com> wrote:> "Suzanne" hotmail.com> wrote:>>> The supposed prophecy DOESN'T mention Jesus of Nazareth by name.
> ...
>> It's not like using Nostradamus' quatrain verses which
>> are certainly vague I'll grant you.
>> But the verses about Jesus have cross-references that are unmistakable.
>
> WHERE???? NONE of the supposed "prophecies" about Jesus in the Old Testament
> mention his name. NONE!!! They could related to ANYONE. The gospel writers
> deliberately fashioned the gospels around some of these "prophecies" to MAKE
> them appear true.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> GOSPEL TIMELINE
>
> 65 - 80 CE
> - Mark's gospel
> - First edition, about 70 CE ...
|
| Show full article (6.21Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: SuzanneSuzanne
Date: Jun 8, 2010 07:42
On Jun 7, 7:25 am, "Ike E 5/21/2010" gmail.com>
wrote:> "I" homeinmystudy00000000040.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4c0cb44a$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>>> "Suzanne" hotmail.com> wrote:>
>>> When Jesus was in the Garden of Gethsemane, he prayed to the
>>> Father
>
>> If Jesus is god then he was praying to himself. Why did he cry out on the
>> cross "MY GOD! MY GOD! Why have you forsaken me?" and not "Myself!
>> Myself! Why have I forsaken myself?" Jesus had a God who was not himself.
>> John 20:17 - "I [Jesus] am ascending to MY FATHER AND YOUR FATHER, MY GOD
>> AND YOUR GOD"
>
>> Does God have a God?
>
> LOL ...
|
| Show full article (1.32Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: KAJOLKAJOL
Date: Jun 8, 2010 07:36
See Hot Sexy Star Priyamani Nude Bathing Videos In All Angles.
at http://uknews.tk
Due to high sex content,i have hidden the videos in an image. in that
website on left side below search box click on image and watch
videos in all angles.please dont tell to anyone.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: SuzanneSuzanne
Date: Jun 8, 2010 07:35
On Jun 7, 4:15 am, "I" homeinmystudy00000000041.com> wrote:> "Suzanne" hotmail.com> wrote:>>>I believe Jesus said a spirit has not flesh and
>>> *bones*--not "flesh and blood."
>
>> Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes!
> ...
>> Lu 24:39 See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself; handle me, and
>> see;
>> for a spirit has not flesh and bones as you see that I have."
>
> SO .....
>
> let us reason together ......
>
> WHAT ascended into heaven in the ascension??????
>
Jesus in his glorified body.
>
> Jesus' spirit or Jesus' earthly body???? ...
|
| Show full article (2.42Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: SuzanneSuzanne
Date: Jun 8, 2010 07:20
On Jun 7, 4:05 am, "I" homeinmystudy00000000040.com> wrote:> "Suzanne" hotmail.com> wrote:>>>> Where in the OT? the suffering servant- Jesus, is.
>>> Isaiah Chapter 53 (see below).
> ...
>> I LOVE this passage. It's wonderful.
>
> It is indeed a wonderfully written passage but it DOESN'T mention Jesus of
> Nazareth by name. Jews say it is a reference to Israel (personified). It
> could apply to HUNDREDS of different people. It is hardly a proof of Jesus
> of Nazareth who was unknown to the writer.
>
Isaiah already introduced the child that would be born, in
chapter 7, verse 14, and that is Immanuel, the child born
of a virgin. People attempting to change the word "virgin,"
never bothered to check out the Greek Septuagint that
was translated by the ancient Hebrew 300 years before
the birth of Christ, when they used a word in Greek that
even today still means virgin. Not only that, but the
story of Rebecca's uses the same word and it says that ...
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: SuzanneSuzanne
Date: Jun 8, 2010 07:12
On Jun 7, 4:02 am, "I" homeinmystudy00000000040.com> wrote:> "Suzanne" hotmail.com> wrote:>>That would be interesting to explore in here if you would
>> print a few of them that you consider to be contradictions.
>
> They are ALL contradictions listed by book or topic. Only ONE of the
> hundreds listed needs to be correct for the bible to be in error. There are
> far more than one!
>
I've seen these lists and figured out their flaws and lack of
understanding. Also, if you don't understand something,
that is not a reason to conclude that it is the Bible that
has to be wrong. For instance, Jesus rode into Jerusalem
on a colt, on a donkey, on a foal. People will tell that they
don't understand it and then turn right around and say that
it has to be an error.
> ...
|
| Show full article (4.25Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
