>
> "H.E. Eickleberry, Jr."
verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:hx75k.38176$lE3.15204@trnddc05...>>>
>>> "H.E. Eickleberry, Jr."
verizon.net> wrote in message
>>> news:0734k.8279$3j2.3304@trnddc03...>>>> "guardian Snow"
yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:1c0da92c-c235-4521-b82c-f671065fde1a@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Jun 11, 10:56 pm, "H.E. Eickleberry, Jr."
>>>> verizon.net> wrote:>>>>> x-no-archive: no
>>>>>
>>>>> "john w @
yahoo.com>"
wrote in
>>>>> messagenews:93pt441guvkmt7hn2pa77luo40jpggcbrq@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:17:04 -0700 (PDT), Linda Lee
>>>>>>
juno.com> wrote:
>>>>>> В© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
>>>>>> may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.>>>>>>>On Jun 10, 2:10 am, guardian Snow
yahoo.com.au>
>>>>>>>wrote:>>>>>>>> On May 31, 2:55 pm, "H.E. Eickleberry, Jr."
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
verizon.net> wrote:>>>>>>>>> Wrong answer.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> First, Hebrews was not written by Paul, but an Essene/Gnostic,
>>>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>>>> book
>>>>>>>>> was written AFTER Revelation, and it attempts to undo much of
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> theology
>>>>>>>>> of Revelation.
>>>>>
>>>>>> ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I am convinced "Ike" has a brain tumor or
>>>>>> something.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...says the luantic who does little more than rage on...
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've seen NOTHING that suggests or indicates that Hebrews was
>>>>>> written by a gnostic.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> And I repeat...
>>>>>
>>>>> Hebrews BORROWS ITS SYMBOLISMS FROM REVELATION, while reversing many
>>>>> of
>>>>> Revelation's doctrines.
>>>>
>>>>> You have me confused.
>>>>
>>>> You were confused long before I got here...
>>>>
>>>>> Do you support Revelation or Hebrews?
>>>>
>>>> ???
>>>>
>>>> I've been saying all along that Hebrews doesn't belong in the Bible.
>>>>
>>>>> From
>>>>> what you state about "legalism" I'd have to say you support Hebrews
>>>>> which calls the commandments weak, not Revelations that says the
>>>>> saints keep the commandments and faith in Jesus Christ.
>>>>
>>>> No, it says THE 144,000 will keep the commandments AND have the faith
>>>> of Christ. That has nothing to DO with the Churches. (This is yet
>>>> ANOTHER perversion of theology by the author of Hebrews.)
>>>>
>>>> The 144,000 will be the MAN-CHILD of Revelation, the THIRD ISRAEL,
>>>> which will be OF Israel, and OF Christianity, but NEITHER, as God
>>>> RECONCILES (not "replaces") the previous two covenants.
>>>>
>>>> The CHRISTIANS, now, are the "foolish nation" that God raised up to
>>>> PROVOKE the Jews.
>>>>
>>>> God got His fill of the children of the law and their pointless
>>>> legalisms, and is now saving people WITHOUT the law to PROVOKE the
>>>> children of the law, just to SPITE them, and demonstrate His
>>>> sovereignty, and the children of lawlessness are now MORE LAWFUL than
>>>> the Children of the LAW, because they're NOT RELYING on their OWN
>>>> lawfulness, but CHRIST'S.
>>>>
>>>> This is the "was, is, and is to come" of eschatology.
>>>>
>>>> Ike
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nice of you to re-write the bible.
>>
>> No, the AUTHOR OF HEBREWS "rewrote" the Bible.
>
> You mean it is over your head, right?
>
>>
>> THAT'S the POINT.
>>
>>> You don't know any more what those particular passages mean than the
>>> people of old could figure out how people could speak with lightnings as
>>> David stated.
>>
>> When I figure out what you just said, I'll come up with a snappy
>> comeback.
>
> I should have said Daniel, but again over the head of a critical neophyte.
>
>>
>>> There are scholars (most of whom don't even believe in God) and then
>>> there are Christians who live by the "Gospel"
>>
>> Another irrelevant and pointless statement.
>
> Yep, to you the Gospel is pointles. It's the ONLY thing.
>
>>
>> And for your information, oh, clueless one, there were SEVERAL books that
>> made it into the canon of the New Testament that the patriarchs has
>> SERIOUS problems with, but they were included BECAUSE OF INTER-CHURCH
>> POLITICS, and NOT on their MERITS.
>>
>> Go learn something about how the Bible developed, and what is right and
>> wrong with it.
>>
>> THEN you can come back and tell me what belongs and what doesn't.
>
>
>
> Been there, done that. (4 colleges in four different denominatins) You
> have only read stories and authors looking for money.
LOL
Riiiight.
Ike
