> Who want's in on this book I'm getting ready to write? I'm looking
> for writers to help draft up some rough outlines, before I take my
> ideas to a professional ghost writer. Here is what I got so far..
> The only thing I'm leaving out is all the local history going back to
> before American's came to this country.
>
> ...
>
> Do you know what is happening at Yellow Stone Cemetary Park? Or even
> where I live in Yellow Springs Ohio? What these two places have in
> common are the longest running river systems in the United States.
> Just look at a river map, and you can see how the small short streams
> begin in valleys like the one in Yellow Stone Missouri, and what we
> have in our nature preserve. The AC Service company handles all of
> the cemetaries, and the air conditioning, and the plumming.
>
> What they don't tell us in school is that our spirits live in our
> blood, in our breath, and in our bones. The Holy Sea of water, air,
> and minerals. The holy fucking trinity. When we die we are either
> cremated, or are processed naturally in burial grounds. Two options
> exist for burial grounds now, you can either be flushed into a river
> or wind up in a marsh. The rivers make up the blood, and the marshes
> make up gardens for the bread. Those that can get away with a propper
> cremation turn to light and escape. I can't be sure if any
> crematorium is running up to standards or not. Some will just boil
> you slow and turn all of your spirit into steam, that circulates
> through the system.
>
> I'm writing because Mobsters working for the Vatican have moved into
> our town, and are setting us all up and taking control. The chemical
> factory dumping their pollution into the storm drains were polluting
> the nature preserve, and were shut down. The gutter system where the
> spirit comes out in the preserve has been dessecrated. Bodies have
> been turning up mutilated, and suicides are found all over the glen.
> These are threats. The little children are being processed and are
> finding jobs working for the mafia, and I'm confessing my sins.
> Begging for mercy.
>
> At yellow stone national park there is a webpage up about all of the
> suicides that keep happening, which are misterious enough to be linked
> to mafioso murders. And if you ask me we are at war on the holyland
> to establish our western pressence as the ones in control of the sea
> of spirit. Soon the nuclear bomb will drop, and when it falls the
> chosen ones spirit will be in the nuclear bomb and explode into
> light. But it will probably not be you or me. If you can catch a
> ride on the underground railroad system and make it into a long
> running river there might be a way out before you get dumped into the
> ocean. And if you can find a way to get a good cremation you could
> slip through the cracks in this nuclear age. All nuclear plants do is
> boil steam untill it gets hotter than air and turns to the same energy
> that powers the sun. If you can do it that way you can burn up all
> the minerals in the gasses as well as the fluids, and even the air
> within the body.
>

>>From what I am reading on wikipedia Einstein has discovered that the

>
> idea of a point of reference in astronomy is a necessarily trivial
> thing. When making a model of the universe we can say that the stars,
> the planets, and the earth all revolve around the sun, in a
> Heliocentric model. We could also convert this model to any other
> model with another point of reference, although it would be far more
> complex to say everything revolved around the earth. Is anyone
> familiar with the math involved in these calculations, and might point
> me to a book?
>
> I believe that there is other life out there, on other planets. My
> theory is that the sun is the only star, and the other stars are just
> bright and distant planets with life on them, the same as earth. I
> think life can burn up and turn to light, and when it travels off of
> one planet the photosenthetic life on another planet will catch it and
> trap it on the new planet. But this is crazy, yes? :)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentrism
>
> The realization that the heliocentric view was also not true in a
> strict sense was achieved in steps. That the Sun was not the center of
> the universe, but one of innumerable stars, was strongly advocated by
> the mystic Giordano Bruno; Galileo made the same point, but said very
> little on the matter, perhaps not wishing to incur the church's wrath.
> Over the course of the 18th and 19th centuries, the status of the Sun
> as merely one star among many became increasingly obvious. By the 20th
> century, even before the discovery that there are many galaxies, it
> was no longer an issue.
>
> Even if the discussion is limited to the solar system, the sun is not
> at the geometric center of any planet's orbit, but rather at one focus
> of the elliptical orbit. Furthermore, to the extent that a planet's
> mass cannot be neglected in comparison to the Sun's mass, the center
> of gravity of the solar system is displaced slightly away from the
> center of the Sun. (The masses of the planets, mostly Jupiter, amount
> to 0.14%% of that of the Sun.) Therefore a hypothetical astronomer on
> an extrasolar planet would observe a "wobble".
>
> Giving up the whole concept of being "at rest" is related to the
> principle of relativity. While, assuming an unbounded universe, it was
> clear there is no privileged position in space, until postulation of
> the special theory of relativity by Albert Einstein, at least the
> existence of a privileged class of inertial systems absolutely at rest
> was assumed, in particular in the form of the hypothesis of the
> luminiferous aether. Some forms of Mach's principle consider the frame
> at rest with respect to the masses in the universe to have special
> properties.
>
> Modern use of geocentric and heliocentric
>
> In modern calculations, the origin and orientation of a coordinate
> system often have to be selected. For practical reasons, systems with
> their origin in the mass, solar mass or in the center of mass of solar
> system are frequently selected. The adjectives may be used in this
> context. However, such selection of coordinates has no philosophical
> or physical implications.
>
> Fred Hoyle wrote:
>
> The relation of the two pictures [geocentricity and
> heliocentricity] is reduced to a mere coordinate transformation and it
> is the main tenet of the Einstein's theory that any two ways of
> looking at the world which are related to each other by a coordinate
> transformation are entirely equivalent from a physical point of view.
> (Hoyle, 1973, p. 78)