|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: ZeusZeus Date: Aug 27, 2007 09:20
In the Bible he is Lucifer, Beelzebub, Satan. Others believe that
there is no Satan only evil Gods and Goddesses. What constitutes a
good God?
Is death a good thing or bad thing?
If a hurricane smashes a city, is that good or bad- Most insurance
companies classify this as an act of God.
What about sex? Humans like sex, right? That makes it good, right?
The problem with Gods and Goddesses is simple. They do not know what
is good and what is evil. What is evil to one person, is good to
another. Wars, natural disasters, disease, starvation, genocide are
just a few human population controls. Is it good to control human's
population or is it bad?
You are now responsible for climate changes that will cause the
extinction of many animals. Polar bears, coral reefs, penguins, harp
seals, arctic fox- kiss them goodbye in a few years. Who is their
advocate?
One noted idea is "to be fruitful and multiply" well, that has been
achieved up to the point where the earth is covered with people.
|
| Show full article (1.36Kb) |
|
| | 66 Comments |
|
|
Author: TomTom Date: Aug 27, 2007 14:05
> In the Bible he is Lucifer, Beelzebub, Satan.
Lucifer in Isaiah refers to a fallen Babylonian king, whose name, BTW, was
not "Lucifer" but who had a kingly title "Son of the Morning". The
"Lucifer" name got tacked on by Christian translators working in Latin.
"Lucifer" means "Light-bearer" in Latin. It don't mean shit in Hebrew.
Beelzebub was mocking distortion of the name of a god of several Philistine
cities, Baal. In Canaanite, "Baal-Zebul" meant "Prince Baal". In Hebrew,
"Baal Zevuv" meant "Lord of Flies". Haw, haw. Good one.
The biblical term "satan" is a title, not the name of a person. The title
gets applied to any number of individuals in the bible, even old Yahweh
himself (Numbers 22). The word itself means "adversary" or "accuser".
So, as you might now see, the reason for all those names is that they refer
to a lot of different individuals. It's only naive and largely uneducated
Christians who lump them all together as the same guy.
> Others believe that
> there is no Satan only evil Gods and Goddesses.
People believe all kinds of stupid shit.
|
| |
|
| | 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: AbsorbedAbsorbed Date: Aug 27, 2007 15:09
Tom wrote:
>> In the Bible he is Lucifer, Beelzebub, Satan.
>
> Lucifer in Isaiah refers to a fallen Babylonian king, whose name, BTW, was
> not "Lucifer" but who had a kingly title "Son of the Morning". The
> "Lucifer" name got tacked on by Christian translators working in Latin.
> "Lucifer" means "Light-bearer" in Latin. It don't mean shit in Hebrew.
>
> Beelzebub was mocking distortion of the name of a god of several Philistine
> cities, Baal. In Canaanite, "Baal-Zebul" meant "Prince Baal". In Hebrew,
> "Baal Zevuv" meant "Lord of Flies". Haw, haw. Good one.
>
> The biblical term "satan" is a title, not the name of a person. The title
> gets applied to any number of individuals in the bible, even old Yahweh
> himself (Numbers 22). The word itself means "adversary" or "accuser".
>
> So, as you might now see, the reason for all those names is that they refer
> to a lot of different individuals. It's only naive and largely uneducated ...
|
| Show full article (1.43Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Seon FergusonSeon Ferguson Date: Aug 27, 2007 17:10
> In the Bible he is Lucifer, Beelzebub, Satan. Others believe that
> there is no Satan only evil Gods and Goddesses. What constitutes a
> good God?
>
> Is death a good thing or bad thing?
> If a hurricane smashes a city, is that good or bad- Most insurance
> companies classify this as an act of God.
> What about sex? Humans like sex, right? That makes it good, right?
>
> The problem with Gods and Goddesses is simple. They do not know what
> is good and what is evil. What is evil to one person, is good to
> another. Wars, natural disasters, disease, starvation, genocide are
> just a few human population controls. Is it good to control human's
> population or is it bad?
>
> You are now responsible for climate changes that will cause the
> extinction of many animals. Polar bears, coral reefs, penguins, harp
> seals, arctic fox- kiss them goodbye in a few years. Who is their ...
|
| Show full article (1.89Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Seon FergusonSeon Ferguson Date: Aug 27, 2007 17:11
> Tom wrote:
>>> In the Bible he is Lucifer, Beelzebub, Satan.
>>
>> Lucifer in Isaiah refers to a fallen Babylonian king, whose name, BTW,
>> was not "Lucifer" but who had a kingly title "Son of the Morning". The
>> "Lucifer" name got tacked on by Christian translators working in Latin.
>> "Lucifer" means "Light-bearer" in Latin. It don't mean shit in Hebrew.
>>
>> Beelzebub was mocking distortion of the name of a god of several
>> Philistine cities, Baal. In Canaanite, "Baal-Zebul" meant "Prince Baal".
>> In Hebrew, "Baal Zevuv" meant "Lord of Flies". Haw, haw. Good one.
>>
>> The biblical term "satan" is a title, not the name of a person. The
>> title gets applied to any number of individuals in the bible, even old
>> Yahweh himself (Numbers 22). The word itself means "adversary" or
>> "accuser". ...
|
| Show full article (1.69Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DelilaDelila Date: Aug 27, 2007 18:22
>
> That's interesting. Can you recommend a good book introducing bible
> studies or that presents similar interesting tidbits?
Try "Genesis of the Grail Kings" by Laurence Gardner. In my opinion this
book and most of his others should be required reading for anyone who's
trying to find out the truth about the Judeo-Christian religion.
D.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: NevermoreNevermore Date: Aug 27, 2007 18:51
> From: "Seon Ferguson" gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.satanism,alt.religion.wicca,alt.magick
> Subject: Re: WHY SO MANY NAMES FOR SATAN???
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:11:26 +1000
>
>
> "Absorbed" hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:favi0j$d9f$1@registered.motzarella.org...>> Tom wrote:
>>>> In the Bible he is Lucifer, Beelzebub, Satan.
>>>
>>> Lucifer in Isaiah refers to a fallen Babylonian king, whose name,
>>> BTW, was not "Lucifer" but who had a kingly title "Son of the
>>> Morning". The "Lucifer" name got tacked on by Christian
>>> translators working in Latin. "Lucifer" means "Light-bearer" in
>>> Latin. It don't mean shit in Hebrew. ...
|
| Show full article (3.69Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Joseph LittleshoesJoseph Littleshoes Date: Aug 27, 2007 21:17
Tom wrote:
> It don't mean shit in Hebrew.
Most English words don't.
ORIGIN Old English scitte [diarrhea,] of Germanic origin; related to
Dutch schijten, German scheissen (verb). The term was originally neutral
and used without vulgar connotation.
--
JL
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: TomTom Date: Aug 27, 2007 23:07
> Tom wrote:
>>> In the Bible he is Lucifer, Beelzebub, Satan.
>>
>> Lucifer in Isaiah refers to a fallen Babylonian king, whose name, BTW,
>> was not "Lucifer" but who had a kingly title "Son of the Morning". The
>> "Lucifer" name got tacked on by Christian translators working in Latin.
>> "Lucifer" means "Light-bearer" in Latin. It don't mean shit in Hebrew.
>>
>> Beelzebub was mocking distortion of the name of a god of several
>> Philistine cities, Baal. In Canaanite, "Baal-Zebul" meant "Prince Baal".
>> In Hebrew, "Baal Zevuv" meant "Lord of Flies". Haw, haw. Good one.
>>
>> The biblical term "satan" is a title, not the name of a person. The
>> title gets applied to any number of individuals in the bible, even old
>> Yahweh himself (Numbers 22). The word itself means "adversary" or
>> "accuser". ...
|
| Show full article (1.82Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: TomTom Date: Aug 27, 2007 23:08
"Joseph Littleshoes" isp.com> wrote in message
news:3545c$46d3a204$4396f769$2141@DIALUPUSA.NET...> Tom wrote:
>> It don't mean shit in Hebrew.
>
> Most English words don't.
Nor Latin ones.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
