> On Apr 19, 6:30 am, 104 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> Tani Jantsang © wrote:

>>> "104" wrote in messagenews:132a96s5hpqh4bf@news.supernews.com...

>>>> Let's talk about the "Left Hand Path" and what it is and what it means
>>>> today, as well as what it might have meant originally. Anyone know where
>>>> the term originated?

>

>>>> Is a "Left Hand Path" person also a "Black Brother"?

>

>>> Left Hand Path and Right Hand Path: Defined.

>

>>> BY Tani Jantsang

>

>>> The terms LHP, and RHP, are not Western, and certainly not Christian. While
>>> Tantrik "Buddhists" never called themselves RHP or LHP, this term was
>>> applied to them. The two aren't at odds with each other. Both paths are ways
>>> to Wisdom: the difference is not in the goal but in the method.

>

>>> Hinayana Buddhism (Little Path Buddhism) is the closest Buddhist sect to
>>> what Siddhartha actually taught. Its emphasis is on the 8-fold noble path,
>>> and other things typically associated with early Buddhist practice. It is
>>> very concerned with rules, laws, and proper behavior: etiquette! While it is
>>> a path of Wisdom, it is not a path of Knowing. Of course, those on this path
>>> are not considered able to know otherwise they wouldn't be on that path! It
>>> is not their fate to be on any other path.

>

>>> Mahayana Buddhism (Great Path Buddhism) replaced Theravada. Nagarjuna is
>>> considered the successor to the Buddha by the followers of this path.
>>> Mahayana is more of a path of knowing, but it's not what we would consider
>>> Satanic in the Dark Path sense that "all knowing happens directly through
>>> the whole body." The person who seeks out this path seeks it out because he
>>> is unable to know through the body directly, but he is able to understand
>>> with the mind. In Pythagorean terms, these people could be considered
>>> Akousmatikoi: those who are able to listen, and learn the way to do
>>> something, even if they can't truly understand.

>

>>> Vajrayana (Vajra Path, Lightning Path, Direct Path), or Tantrik "Buddhism,"
>>> is the path of instant, direct, and specifically physical-body knowledge and
>>> is more rightly called either Padma Sambhava-ism or just Shiva-ism. Strictly
>>> speaking, in terms of Theology, it is not Buddhism. Herein is the tradition
>>> of Kundalini Yoga, the Siddhi, Tumo, Phova, Milam, the Chod, etc. and other
>>> recognizably Black Magical practices. Those who are on this path are there
>>> because they can do Vajrayana and attain Samadhi without thinking about it
>>> (literally). In fact, they do it without "wanting" to. That's the real key.
>>> . . they do through active non doing. Vajrayana is totally LHP - but this
>>> does not mean that those from whole cultures that are Vajrayanists don't
>>> have fun or do normal things. (This has nothing to do with the invention
>>> called "Tantrik Sex," nor does it have a thing to do with breaking taboos.
>>> These notions are totally modern, Western inventions of sex clubs.)

>

>>> Mahayana is LHP in the sense that the reason for its existence is that it is
>>> a path of knowing from the inner method even if it takes slow, methodical
>>> steps to this knowledge. Mahayana is also RHP because it is the doing of
>>> deeds that help the person "acquire" this knowledge.

>

>>> Now. . . here is the important Truth. There is no conflict between these
>>> paths if they are True; they are yin/yang and exist together and this
>>> embodies real stratification in the sense of people naturally working at
>>> their own abilities. I.e., what you are good at, naturally comes easy!
>>> Because of this, there is always RHP in LHP, and always LHP in RHP. There is
>>> the "Being" of the receptive LHP and then the "Becoming" which is the active
>>> RHP. There is the Knowledge of the LHP that leads to the deeds of the RHP.
>>> Everything is Yin and Yang. Passive Idea; Active Deed. Like Sat-Being and
>>> Tan-Becoming.

>

>>> To people at inner peace with themselves, the Dark Paths are Peaceful. They
>>> are beautiful, soft, and solitary. . . This does not mean they are hermits;
>>> not at all. There is nothing busy or hectic about the Dark Paths. They are
>>> totally inner. When a person has an inner core which has been compromised by
>>> cultural Christianity or something else, the best they can come up with is a
>>> self-overcoming where they try, oftentimes in vain, to "fix" their broken
>>> selves. In neurological terms, they lack the "organic I." These people
>>> cannot know. The best thing for them is to join one of the pacifistic
>>> liberal Christian Churches they rage against so at least they have rules
>>> that prevent them from hurting themselves or others. What they don't
>>> understand is that they cannot know, because they are not able to grasp the
>>> knowledge that is at the Core of their Being. They often sublimate by
>>> "getting interested in" rebellion: but against what? What exactly is it they
>>> are rebelling against?

>

>>> If they really want to revolt against tyranny, why are they sublimating? Why
>>> don't they do something? Most of these types that "get into Satanism" are
>>> inversionist Christians and they shove their "Christian shit" in our faces
>>> as much or more than Fundamentalist Christians shove the Christian shit in
>>> our faces. They reek of Christianity, and within them it's an infection they
>>> try to get out of their systems by screaming and wailing about it and
>>> turning it all upside down. Satanists don't want to hear it. An American
>>> flag side ways or upside down is recognizably still an American flag. And a
>>> cross upside down is still a Cross. Same thing.

>

>>> The RHP is the way of Yang. The LHP is the way of Yin. That's it. And like
>>> Yin and Yang, you cannot separate the two. Yin/Dark/Receptive.
>>> Yang/Light/Active.

>

>>> But this is the danger of the Lie. . . when Right and Left become something
>>> that are against each other, then the RHP is a false path.... a false Light.
>>> And LHP is felt (not thought, but felt) to be frightening and evil. This
>>> misconception, within a person, is the striving, craving for the Light Alone
>>> rebelling to exist without the Dark Parent from whence it came. That is
>>> truly self-destructive... The only people who understand what RHP and LHP
>>> really are. . . and then also see these as separate and opposed. . . are
>>> Klippoths. They see it opposed because they themselves are opposed to their
>>> own shell-ish non-being. In otherwords, they know this Lie and Falsehood
>>> through their own peculiar flesh!

>

>>> Apparently, or so I'm told, there is some kind of Thelemite tradition that
>>> has it that the LHP was derived from the thesis about Lucifer being God's
>>> angel seated on His left. It spoke or taught of a more aggressive approach
>>> to the occult and was adopted by many styles of magic, including early
>>> Thelema. That puts a whole new slant on the confusion over LHP and RHP which
>>> is, in fact, very new and exclusively Western, perhaps WASP only. Please
>>> refer to "Which KINDS of Satanism" on this website. I am unable to locate a
>>> thesis on this; it may be just the oral tradition of some groups of
>>> Thelemites and never written down.

>

>>> For the record, "Lucifer" was never used as the name for Satan or the Devil
>>> until Milton used it. The other reference to Hilel for Nebuchadnezzar is a
>>> mistranslation by Origin, as is pointed out in an essay entitled, "Satan Or
>>> Lucifer - The Same? Or the Opposite!," in Package of Doctrines (on sale, see
>>> the advertisement).

>

>>> However, interestingly, from the Christian Bible: [Mat 25:32] Before him
>>> will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate them one from another
>>> as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, [Mat 25:33] and he will
>>> place the sheep at his right hand, but the goats at the left. Christians
>>> have always referred to themselves as sheep. Satanists identify with the
>>> Goat of Mendes. The Goat is actually Azazel, but Azazel alone was never
>>> associated with the Hebrew ha stn (The Satan). The Hebrews did have a more
>>> folkish tradition wherein they combined Samael, Leviathan (or Lilith) and
>>> Azazal together to make "The Beast," or CHIVA. For more on this, please see
>>>www.lylyth.org

>

>>> The Standard Definition, even given in "Mind of the Ninja" by Dr. Petersen,
>>> which he wrote and explained for a Western readership, is what we use in the
>>> bonafide Dark Tradition. This has nothing to do with behavior, or with
>>> rebellion. In fact, the entire Promethian (or Luciferian) tradition in
>>> regular Western Civilization, something that led to the industrial age and
>>> technological age, are very RHP. Surely, the inspiration for such works was
>>> originally LHP in that it was inspired; but making these marvels of
>>> technology manifest is an act that is purely an example of RHP. More or
>>> less, the inventors took what was darkly inspired and brought it into the
>>> light to be seen and used by all.

>

>>> If anything, rebellion and revolt against unjust societies (very bloody
>>> usually) are Yang - ergo RPH according to the way we ubiquitously understand
>>> things. I've given the standard definition in this article. The Encyclopedia
>>> of Buddhism, which also defines Naga Shivaism, something much older, has
>>> this same definition and anyone that takes the "above" and synthesizes it
>>> with the "below" can clearly see this.. Even Kung Fu, the way they define
>>> yin and yang forms, fits this definition.

>

>>> Also

>

>>>http://www.geocities.com/satanicreds/lhp-rhp2.html

>

>> Hello Tani, did you or anyone you know contribute to the information at
>> the wikipedia link on this subject?

>
> Heh, 104 looking to tani the kookisar for the truth.... hilarious!
>
> -Douglas-

>
> - Show quoted text -