>
> "Bassos" wrote in message
> news:48c98d1e$0$3193$e4fe514c@dreader27.news.xs4all.nl...
>>
>> "SixthtySixthSix"
ATT.NET> wrote in message
>> news:ou1wk.19092$LG4.16452@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com...>>>> Ls,
>>>> Yes i am Bassos.
>>>> Here i challenge you to attack me.
>>>> My response will be a complete destruction of you (feel free to try and
>>>> oppose this rule).
>>>>
>>>> So the actual challenge: Kill me before next week.
>>>>
>>>> I will not counterattack before next week.
>>>> I will after i find some annoyence, no telling if that is you.
>>>> This will push away the noobs.
>>>> Are you a noob ?
>>>> Tom, will you compete? (i have a score to settle with you)
>>>
>>> I am intrigued by your challenge, but I seriously doubt my abilities
>>> could complete the task in such a brief period of time. Further, I pick
>>> and choose my enemies- you may be quite a fine fellow, and it just
>>> wouldn't do not to have another friend... and so I must, currently,
>>> exercise reservation.
>>>
>>> I wish you best of fortune in duel...
>>
>> Half of the point was that there would be no challenge.
>>
>> I actually mentioned this, and also mentioned i spoiled the fun.
>> Thank god most people posting in alt.magick are idiots.
>
> Aha! Sorry, missed the first part of the thread...
Sometimes things present themselves at appropriate times.
Some other times it takes a while before understanding why it was
appropriate.
> I see. I would never have expected Tom to accept your challenge; you are
> right. I would have expected at least one of Tom's butt-monkeys to,
> rashly, though... wonder where that went.
It was the fear.
For an admitted experiment.
> I would have accepted your challenge to duel, just to duel, however, I
> seriously doubted that my ability could afford any worthy reply in the
> time frame afforded... I would think that any legitimate answer and reply
> would take one-half lunar cycle...
Do elaborate.
Hell, let's make it about who can make the opponent experence the most
fortunate experiences.
(seems much nicer than a kill contest)
The category of me blessing you is better than you blessing me :P
> What cowards couldn't manage to bring themselves to the challenge for
> fear, even without direct confrontation?
It is the old dichotomy.
It may all be bullshit, but what if it is not ?
Hence fear, cos lack of knowledge.
> Such may be more legitimately accounted for in some instances by concern
> regarding weakness of one's majick or at least an endorsement of the
> list's theme- majick.
/wave at nagasiva, heyas dude, how is you ?
> But wasn't Tom called out?
There is no possible way to call out anyone who is not limited by what other
people think.
