Group: alt.magick · Group Profile
Author: SixthtySixthSixSixthtySixthSix Date: Sep 11, 2008 22:39
"Bassos" wrote in message
news:48c98d1e$0$3193$e4fe514c@dreader27.news.xs4all.nl...
>
> "SixthtySixthSix" ATT.NET> wrote in message
> news:ou1wk.19092$LG4.16452@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com...>>> Ls,
>>> Yes i am Bassos.
>>> Here i challenge you to attack me.
>>> My response will be a complete destruction of you (feel free to try and
>>> oppose this rule).
>>>
>>> So the actual challenge: Kill me before next week.
>>>
>>> I will not counterattack before next week.
>>> I will after i find some annoyence, no telling if that is you.
>>> This will push away the noobs.
>>> Are you a noob ?
>>> Tom, will you compete? (i have a score to settle with you)
>>
>> I am intrigued by your challenge, but I seriously doubt my abilities
>> could complete the task in such a brief period of time. Further, I pick
>> and choose my enemies- you may be quite a fine fellow, and it just
>> wouldn't do not to have another friend... and so I must, currently,
>> exercise reservation.
>>
>> I wish you best of fortune in duel...
>
> Half of the point was that there would be no challenge.
>
> I actually mentioned this, and also mentioned i spoiled the fun.
> Thank god most people posting in alt.magick are idiots.
Aha! Sorry, missed the first part of the thread...
I see. I would never have expected Tom to accept your challenge; you are
right. I would have expected at least one of Tom's butt-monkeys to, rashly,
though... wonder where that went.
I would have accepted your challenge to duel, just to duel, however, I
seriously doubted that my ability could afford any worthy reply in the time
frame afforded... I would think that any legitimate answer and reply would
take one-half lunar cycle...
What cowards couldn't manage to bring themselves to the challenge for fear,
even without direct confrontation? Such may be more legitimately accounted
for in some instances by concern regarding weakness of one's majick or at
least an endorsement of the list's theme- majick. But wasn't Tom called
out?
| 
