Edwina Hassle wrote:
> On Sep 27, 3:55 pm, Joseph Littleshoes
isp.com> wrote:
> >>Don't forget the use of anatomically based insults where human
>>genitalia, reproductive & eliminatory processes are routinely used as a
>>derogatory nomenclature.
>>
>>No matter to what degree of any particular pathology, the routine use of
>>such derogatory language usually is evidence for some sort of sexual
>>morbidity.
>
>
> No, the routine objection to such use is evidence for some sort of
> sexual morbidity, you utter dipshit.
>
> Congratulations, Littledick, you may be the only person in the history
> of psychology to have a pronounced morbid and prurient shame of butts,
> tits, knobs *and* flaps, all at the same time. You really have evolved
> to a new level of fuckedupness and hysterical sexual fear.
When you, or anybody else compares a persons intelligence or lack there
of to an anatomical part or process it does make me question the
intelligence of such a usage.
>
> What you need, sonny, is a damn good humping,
*chuckle*
> but I suspect your
> inability to obtain this is connected with your problem itself.
I have heard, said and done all those words, i just don't care to have
them scattered about in conversation, especially when used inelegantly
and inappropriately.
> Tough
> shit for you, I guess. Still, it just leaves more rampant totty for
> the rest of us real men.
Something to look forward to girls!
>
> Fucktard.
>
> Erwin Hessle, 8=3
>
