|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Lid ZubaLid Zuba Date: Jun 24, 2008 07:41
93!
i read somewhere that a magick moot are going to do an evocation by the shew
stone in the British Museum, was it not stolen? Has it been recovered?
Anyone who steals things such as this deserves a plague of angry wasps in
their underpants.
93's.
|
| |
|
| | 9 Comments |
|
|
Author: mikamika Date: Jun 24, 2008 10:46
Lid Zuba wrote:
> 93!
>
> i read somewhere that a magick moot
What is a "magick moot"?
> are going to do an evocation by the shew stone in the British Museum,
Are you referring to Dee's shew stone?
> was it not stolen? Has it been recovered?
IIRC, according to the museum's exhibition information booklet (not
mentioned on the display cards) the crystal orb on display with Dee's
items was not actually Dee's shew stone.
> Anyone who steals things such as this deserves a plague of angry wasps in
> their underpants.
Ha. You mean such things like, for example, the Egyptian tomb relics
that the Brits stole and put in their museum?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Lid ZubaLid Zuba Date: Jun 24, 2008 11:47
> Lid Zuba wrote:
>> 93!
>>
>> i read somewhere that a magick moot
>
> What is a "magick moot"?
A moot is a meeting of ppl in real life, in this case of a magickal
persuasion.
>
>> are going to do an evocation by the shew stone in the British Museum,
>
> Are you referring to Dee's shew stone?
Yes.
|
| Show full article (1.40Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChadeChade Date: Jun 25, 2008 02:47
On 24 Jun, 19:47, "Lid Zuba" hotwankmail.co.uk> wrote:>> Lid Zuba wrote:
>>> 93!
>
>
>
>>> was it not stolen? Has it been recovered?
>
>> IIRC, according to the museum's exhibition information booklet (not
>> mentioned on the display cards) the crystal orb on display with Dee's
>> items was not actually Dee's shew stone.
|
| Show full article (0.84Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mikamika Date: Jun 25, 2008 15:54
On Jun 24, 11:47 am, "Lid Zuba" wrote:
> "mika" wrote
>> Lid Zuba wrote:
>
>>> was it not stolen? Has it been recovered?
>
>> IIRC, according to the museum's exhibition information booklet (not
>> mentioned on the display cards) the crystal orb on display with Dee's
>> items was not actually Dee's shew stone.
Perhaps belonged to, but not necessarily the one used for his Enochian
work. Lots of question marks.
|
| Show full article (3.10Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChadeChade Date: Jun 26, 2008 03:16
On 25 Jun, 23:54, mika gmail.com> wrote:>
> Perhaps belonged to, but not necessarily the one used for his Enochian
> work. Lots of question marks.
>
Checking the on-line archives of the Times and the Independent, both
broadsheet newspapers, they report that the thefts were from the
Science Museum. Which is a *different* museum to the British Museum,
although still in the center of London.
I've contacted them, and I'm waiting for a response.
Thanks for sharing.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChadeChade Date: Jun 26, 2008 03:26
On 24 Jun, 19:47, "Lid Zuba" hotwankmail.co.uk> wrote:>
>
> It was a jest, some archeologists can be seen as grave robbers with
> credentials. Do you think the stone should be where everyone can see it or
> held privately?
I can't think of any reason why it shouldn't be on public display.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mikamika Date: Jun 26, 2008 08:31
On Jun 26, 3:16 am, Chade wrote:
> On 25 Jun, 23:54, mika wrote:
>
>> Perhaps belonged to, but not necessarily the one used for his Enochian
>> work. Lots of question marks.
>
> Checking the on-line archives of the Times and the Independent, both
> broadsheet newspapers, they report that the thefts were from the
> Science Museum. Which is a *different* museum to the British Museum,
> although still in the center of London.
No contradiction - check your dates. It looked like the article you
posted above was from 2004. Dee's Enochian related items could have
been held at the Science Museum for a while, stolen and recovered, and
then returned to the British Museum to be (finally) displayed to the
public in a new exhibit ("Enlightenment") which I saw in April 2007.
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ChadeChade Date: Jun 26, 2008 10:42
On 26 Jun, 16:31, mika gmail.com> wrote:> On Jun 26, 3:16 am, Chade wrote:
>
>> On 25 Jun, 23:54, mika wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps belonged to, but not necessarily the one used for his Enochian
>>> work. Lots of question marks.
>
>> Checking the on-line archives of the Times and the Independent, both
>> broadsheet newspapers, they report that the thefts were from the
>> Science Museum. Which is a *different* museum to the British Museum,
>> although still in the center of London.
>
> No contradiction - check your dates. It looked like the article you
> posted above was from 2004. Dee's Enochian related items could have
> been held at the Science Museum for a while, stolen and recovered, and
> then returned to the British Museum to be (finally) displayed to the
> public in a...
|
| Show full article (1.25Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Executive FunctionExecutive Function Date: Jun 28, 2008 13:41
On 26 Jun, 19:42, Chade newsguy.com> wrote:> On 26 Jun, 16:31, mika gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Jun 26, 3:16 am, Chade wrote:
>
>>> On 25 Jun, 23:54, mika wrote:
>
>>>> Perhaps belonged to, but not necessarily the one used for his Enochian
>>>> work. Lots of question marks.
>
>>> Checking the on-line archives of the Times and the Independent, both
>>> broadsheet newspapers, they report that the thefts were from the
>>> Science Museum. Which is a *different* museum to the British Museum,
>>> although still in the center of London.
>
>> No contradiction - check your dates. It looked like the article you ...
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
