"{:-])))" <...nonbeing@large...> wrote in message
news:hgf8d45pm49j6ujd4hurhkufoil4lmdal1@
4ax.com...
> Tom wrote, in p'arts:
>
>> Mechanisms are not merely physical constructions.
>
> Mechanical constructs,
> be they physical, spiritual, ore otherly unwise,
> remain in the realm of constructs.
Every thought is a construction. Every perception is a construction. Go
ahead and live in a world without such constructions, if you can. However,
as soon as you comaplain about there being constructions, it's because you
constructed the complaint. Thus, you are as guilty of constructing as
anybody you complain about.
>>Ah, the obligatory brave exit speech already. That was easy.
>
> Survival mechanism noted.
Inability to follow through on your stated intent not to respond noted. I
guess that thing about "do not let the fact that future replies fail to
appear in alt.magick snooker you into concluding that such replies do not
exist" is meaningless since the responses do in fact appear in alt.magick.
This is a problem with most of you lazy fucks hoping to exacape reality
through obfuscational metaphysics. You think you can solve problems by
simply trying to hide from them. That might work if you actually had the
self-discipline to truly get away from them, but you don't. Thus, you're
stuck. If I reply in any way that pushes any of your pathetically obvious
emotional buttons, you can't resist the impulse to respond defensively.
Try this. Just respond in alt.philosophy.taoism but delete alt.magick from
your crosspost list first. Then refrain from peeking into alt.magick to see
how I handled it. It'll be tough, but I bet you can do it if you really
try. That way, you can pretend you got in the last word. That should make
you feel better, eh? Ignorance is bliss, eh?
