> "Tom" comcast.net> wrote:

>>"{:-])))" <...@...> wrote:

>>> "Tom" comcast.net> wrote:

>>>>"{:-])))" <...@...> wrote in message:

>>>>> "Tom" comcast.net> wrote:

>>>>>>"marika" gmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>> "Tom" comcast.net> wrote:

>>>>> [...s]
>>>>>

>>>>>>>> It's not simply a "belief". It's a considered judgment.

>>>>>

>>>>>>> Maybe they have more efficient egos and we just don't get it and
>>>>>>> lock them
>>>>>>> up because it interferes with our concept of what egos should be
>>>>>>> doing.

>>>>>>
>>>>>>All of them? Or only some of them? As I say, "mental illness" covers
>>>>>>a
>>>>>>wide variety of problems. It's incredibly simplistic to try to lump
>>>>>>all of
>>>>>>them together. Is there any one particular person who you would like
>>>>>>to
>>>>>>cite as an example of how a "more efficient ego" gets one locked up as
>>>>>>mentally ill?

>>>>>
>>>>> Somebody who speaks his or her mind,
>>>>> does as impressed to do, and gets locked up,
>>>>> might be following such a path.

>>>>
>>>>Still nobody in particular.

>>>
>>> Actually,
>>> I was thinking of somebody in particular.

>>
>>But not saying anything in particular. Here are the particulars:
>>
>>Who is this "somebody"?

>
> Let's call him, Fred.