> "Tom" comcast.net> wrote:

>>"{:-])))" <...@...> wrote:

>>> "Tom" comcast.net> wrote:

>>>>"{:-])))" <...@...> wrote in message:

>>>>> "Tom" comcast.net> wrote:

>>>>>>"marika" gmail.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>> "Tom" comcast.net> wrote:

>>>>> [...s]

>

>>>>>>>> It's not simply a "belief". �It's a considered judgment.

>

>>>>>>> Maybe they have more efficient egos and we just don't get it and lock them
>>>>>>> up because it interferes with our concept of what egos should be doing.

>

>>>>>>All of them? �Or only some of them? �As I say, "mental illness" covers a
>>>>>>wide variety of problems. �It's incredibly simplistic to try to lump all of
>>>>>>them together. �Is there any one particular person who you would like to
>>>>>>cite as an example of how a "more efficient ego" gets one locked up as
>>>>>>mentally ill?

>

>>>>> Efficiency might be defined somewhat
>>>>> as the path of least resistance.

>

>>>>> Somebody who speaks his or her mind,
>>>>> does as impressed to do, and gets locked up,
>>>>> might be following such a path.

>

>>>>Still nobody in particular.

>

>>> Actually,
>>> I was thinking of somebody in particular.

>

>>But not saying anything in particular. �Here are the particulars:

>

>>Who is this "somebody"?

>
> Let's call him, Fred.>>