On Sep 8, 3:12 pm, Executive Function
hotmail.com>
wrote:> On 8 Sep, 22:37, dead
gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sep 9, 12:28 am, dead
gmail.com> wrote:>
>>> On Sep 9, 12:06 am, dead
gmail.com> wrote:>
>>>> right part of my perspective that made it interesting was that the
>>>> imagination became involved in the bedroom scene and theres a
>>>> crossover of mind with matter i suppose.
>
> I think you've went to a core subject that isn't spoken much about,
> even on alt.magick. Most of the time, what goes on in our
> imaginations regarding other people are just that - the workings of
> our imagination and we acknowledge that to be non real. At other
> times there is evidence of such startling coincidence between lovers
> that telepathic and emotive communcative transfer seems to be the only
> explanation possible because the rate of coincidence is far too high
> for even the most rigid sceptic. And then there is the mix which is
> like the fridge magnet that says 'I know that when one door closes
> then another opens, but these hallways are really a drag.' :)))
>
>>>> i remember the first times i had sex in australia i was driven into
>>>> philosophizing about solipsism during it, nothing feeling real and
>>>> thinking dominating the senses i guess solipsisms a conclusion.
>
>>>> so that's the negative functioning of a mind during sex i guess.
>>>> it makes me think of nonduality vs pure witnessing put by ken.
>
> People disassociate sex and love a lot
Sex and love are inherently two separate things. What people do is
*associate* them, not *disassociate* them. You, like many, have
associated sex and love in your mind to the point that you don't even
realize it's you that's doing it; you assume it is part of their
nature but it is not. Sex is a physical act, love is an emotion or
feeling or even an intellectual concept. Sometimes, sex is a physical
expression of love. Sometimes, sex is a physical expression of
thoughts and feelings other than love.
Often, love is expressed in other ways that have nothing to do with
sex. In those cases, do you claim that the person has disassociated
love and sex, and that love without sex is profane? If not, why is
sex without love profane, but love without sex isn't?
> To do it without love is to profane the act to meet your
> desires.
What, exactly, is profane about doing something to meet your desires?
Do you eat when you're hungry? Is that profane? Do you ever eat
anything when you're not hungry, or do you ever eat anything that
supplies absolutely no nutritional value whatsoever? Are those acts
profane? How about music, do you ever listen to music? Read books?
Paint? Dance? Go for a walk? Are any of those acts profane?
> This is legitimiate, but only if you don't know any better.
Moralistic bullshit.
