|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: deaddead Date: Sep 8, 2008 09:06
right part of my perspective that made it interesting was that the
imagination became involved in the bedroom scene and theres a
crossover of mind with matter i suppose.
i remember the first times i had sex in australia i was driven into
philosophizing about solipsism during it, nothing feeling real and
thinking dominating the senses i guess solipsisms a conclusion.
so that's the negative functioning of a mind during sex i guess.
it makes me think of nonduality vs pure witnessing put by ken.
|
| |
| 43 Comments |
|
|
Author: deaddead Date: Sep 8, 2008 09:28
On Sep 9, 12:06 am, dead gmail.com> wrote:> right part of my perspective that made it interesting was that the
> imagination became involved in the bedroom scene and theres a
> crossover of mind with matter i suppose.
>
> i remember the first times i had sex in australia i was driven into
> philosophizing about solipsism during it, nothing feeling real and
> thinking dominating the senses i guess solipsisms a conclusion.
>
> so that's the negative functioning of a mind during sex i guess.
> it makes me think of nonduality vs pure witnessing put by ken.
emotions are important but they are also driving people, especially
woman, blind and stupid. it's important to control them or atleast..
important to keep emotions checked by lucid grasp of reality even
when emotions are let to be wild..... ah whatever! :)
|
| Show full article (2.02Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: deaddead Date: Sep 8, 2008 11:01
On Sep 9, 12:28 am, dead gmail.com> wrote:> On Sep 9, 12:06 am, dead gmail.com> wrote:
>>> right part of my perspective that made it interesting was that the
>> imagination became involved in the bedroom scene and theres a
>> crossover of mind with matter i suppose.
>
>> i remember the first times i had sex in australia i was driven into
>> philosophizing about solipsism during it, nothing feeling real and
>> thinking dominating the senses i guess solipsisms a conclusion.
>
>> so that's the negative functioning of a mind during sex i guess.
>> it makes me think of nonduality vs pure witnessing put by ken.
>
> emotions are important but they are also driving people, especially
> woman, blind and stupid. it's important to control them or atleast..
> important to keep emotions checked by lucid grasp of reality even
> when emotions are let to be wild..... ah whatever! :)
>
> yeah sex as metaphor in particular is a good teacher, and learning ...
|
| Show full article (4.56Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: deaddead Date: Sep 8, 2008 13:37
On Sep 9, 12:28 am, dead gmail.com> wrote:> On Sep 9, 12:06 am, dead gmail.com> wrote:
>>> right part of my perspective that made it interesting was that the
>> imagination became involved in the bedroom scene and theres a
>> crossover of mind with matter i suppose.
>
>> i remember the first times i had sex in australia i was driven into
>> philosophizing about solipsism during it, nothing feeling real and
>> thinking dominating the senses i guess solipsisms a conclusion.
>
>> so that's the negative functioning of a mind during sex i guess.
>> it makes me think of nonduality vs pure witnessing put by ken.
>
> emotions are important but they are also driving people, especially
> woman, blind and stupid. it's important to control them or atleast..
> important to keep emotions checked by lucid grasp of reality even
> when emotions are let to be wild..... ah whatever! :)
>
> yeah sex as metaphor in particular is a good teacher, and learning ...
|
| Show full article (2.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: TomTom Date: Sep 8, 2008 14:45
>
> i remember the first times i had sex in australia i was driven into
> philosophizing about solipsism during it, nothing feeling real and
> thinking dominating the senses i guess solipsisms a conclusion.
Perhaps you might try having sex with somebody other than yourself. That
tends to limit the amount of solipsizing you'll do. As for the
philosophizing, you'll end up getting way more sex if you stop doing that
altogether.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: TomTom Date: Sep 8, 2008 14:50
> On Sep 9, 12:06 am, dead gmail.com> wrote:
Heh. Solipsism. The guy responds to his own posts.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: deaddead Date: Sep 8, 2008 14:58
On Sep 9, 5:45 am, "Tom" comcast.net> wrote:>> i remember the first times i had sex in australia i was driven into
>> philosophizing about solipsism during it, nothing feeling real and
>> thinking dominating the senses i guess solipsisms a conclusion.
>
> Perhaps you might try having sex with somebody other than yourself. That
> tends to limit the amount of solipsizing you'll do. As for the
> philosophizing, you'll end up getting way more sex if you stop doing that
> altogether.
mine's bigger, i get more sex and stuff. yawn
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: deaddead Date: Sep 8, 2008 15:00
On Sep 9, 5:50 am, "Tom" comcast.net> wrote:>> On Sep 9, 12:06 am, dead gmail.com> wrote:>
> Heh. Solipsism. The guy responds to his own posts.
Heh indeed, very funny.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: HGHG Date: Sep 8, 2008 15:06
"Tom" comcast.net> writes:
>> On Sep 9, 12:06 am, dead gmail.com> wrote:>
> Heh. Solipsism. The guy responds to his own posts.
It seems he likes his Usenet conversations the way he likes his sex.
HG
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Executive FunctionExecutive Function Date: Sep 8, 2008 15:12
On 8 Sep, 22:37, dead gmail.com> wrote:> On Sep 9, 12:28 am, dead gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Sep 9, 12:06 am, dead gmail.com> wrote:>
>>> right part of my perspective that made it interesting was that the
>>> imagination became involved in the bedroom scene and theres a
>>> crossover of mind with matter i suppose.
|
| Show full article (5.45Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
