| Re: Shambhala: The Sacred Path of the Warrior - Renunciation and Daring |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.magick · Group Profile
Author: mikamika Date: Aug 22, 2008 16:46
On Aug 22, 4:16Â pm, "Searles O'Dubhain" wrote:
> "mika" wrote
>
>> "But, remember that tensor analysis etc remain valid, accurate and
>>*real* within the context of the system in which they are defined.
>> It's not as if you change the context and suddenly everything you
>> previously knew was in error, it's just that what you previously knew
>> may no longer apply to the new situation."
>
> *** It's how they transform from one system to another that increases their
> usefulness. ***
Huh? That makes no sense. What are you trying to say? What if some
knowledge doesn't transform from one system to another at all, are you
saying it's no longer useful? Or that it's not as useful as something
that can apply in multiple systems? That's complete nonsense.
Consider Newtonian physics - does not apply to systems of atomic or
galactic proportions, yet not only is it useful, it's arguably more
useful than the modern physics that followed. F=ma builds bridges,
E=mc^2 does not, even though the latter is applicable to far more
systems than the former.
Besides which, what does your comment above have to do with anything
we have been discussing? I though we were talking about
distinguishing between illusion and the accurate perception of
reality. The usefulness of that perception is irrelevant.
>
> ***I started reading it but Erwin seems to be a bit brash
So what?
> and not yet complete.***
What does that mean? He doesn't seem fully enlightened to you,
therefore what he has to say must be irrelevant and useless?
| 
