Chris Hills wrote:

NOTE: I am not stating my stance for or against homosexuality, just a
reply to your tirade Chris.

First off, not all Christians are against homosexuals, or at least
don't not view them as persons. Although in the bible there are
several warning against "homosexuality", it could be that it is more
about pedophiles, rapists, etc other than Bob and Ted trying to get
married.

Second, homosexuality is not necessarily a part of nature simply of two
male chipmunks trying to get married and start fabulous careers in
interior decoration while creating throw pillows. Homosexuality in
nature (i.e. the animal kingdom aside from humans (even though humans
are animals to a degree)) is generally seen strictly as a show of
dominance. Ever seen the show Oz? Sort of the point. You see, snakes
for example don't fight like other animals. They have to twist and
writhe aroud each other until one's head is forced to the ground
beneath the other. One might say, wow, those two snakes are flaming
homos, but the one of top seems to be more like a bear. The more
intelligent person would say, wow that one snake lost the fight, the
other is dominating the one below that lost the fight. Then, male and
female snakes have a fight before the sex, and they writhe around each
other before actual insertion, only when the female's head has been
forced to the ground. In the case of the two males having homo sex, it
could be, that umm, the one slipped in the wrong hole while fighting,
as they're both male snakes. It could also be that snakes have no
general mental comprehension, just general senses such as smell, sight,
and touch. So the dominant Bob accidentally slipped into Ted's hole
because Bob is as smart as a tree stump but a great fighter. On up the
food chain, the dominant animals possibly humiliate or scare the other
males to stay away from the prize females, by getting raped by the same
sex alpha. Or, perhaps they're flamers. Whatever the case, the whole
nature argument has nothing to do with homosexuality as being normal in
humans, since we don't generally rape others, unless we want a long
prison sentence. If two animals are heading up brokeback mountain and
it's normal for them, it doesn't necessarily mean humans going up
brokeback mountain is normal simply cause the animals went there. Most
animals wouldn't comprehend something as being normal in the brokeback
mountain tradition, they simply eat, drink, sleep, kill and reproduce.
Except for certain primates, dolphins and a few others, they have no
great mental capacity to say "Wow, bob and ted doing each other is
normal, it must be because humans think its normal". Sorry, but I hate
that argument about homosexuality is normal because other animals are
slipping in the wrong hole on occasion. If a homosexual person thinks
that their lifestyle is normal, fine, but leave this whole animal
kingdom argument alone. For the record, I don't care about what people
do in their bedrooms, i just can't stand that retarded argument of
stating that homosexuality is normal, because someone once saw two male
sperm whales gettin it on on the National Geographic channel.

I dont think that gays can't be politicians. However, candidates
getting elected while being known in the media as "openly gay" could
present problems for them etting elected and winning elections. I also
don't think that gays can't be responsible when it comes to rearing
children. But what I do think is is that someone being mentally
unstable, gay or straight, should not be in a position of power,
around adults or children. I don't however understand the need for
discrimination against gays or straights, and I don't understand the
need for those in power to display their bedroom habits. Not exactly
criteria for being responsible to run the office.

I can't even stand thinking any more about this retarded thread.