On May 25, 10:25Â am, John Baker bizniz.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2008 20:54:55 -0700 (PDT), Janine Starscream
>
>
>
>
>
> yahoo.com> wrote:
>>On May 24, 2:11Â am, johac remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> In article <4836cfd7$0$56771$edfad...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>,
>>> Â "thomas p." yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>> "johac"
remove.sbcglobal.net> skrev i en meddelelse
>>>>news:jhachmann-DC5322.23462222052008@news.giganews.com...
>>>>> In article
>>>>>
l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> Mike hofstra.edu> wrote:
>
>>>>>> On May 23, 1:47 am, johac remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <4835D838.6000...@
isp.com>,
>>>>>>> Joseph Littleshoes
isp.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> After all, what is the most 'religion' can do? warp peoples minds and
>>>>>>>> hearts? get them to believe in and act on 'moral' ideals that may
>>>>>>>> include the slaughter of those who do not share precisely the same
>>>>>>>> ideals (shiite vs. sunni?).
>
>>>>>>>> Now "Science" and of course by that i mean the products of the
>>>>>>>> 'scientific method' are the source of the tools that the religious or
>>>>>>>> atheist fanatic would need to oppress the masses.
>
>>>>>>>> The industrial revolution is more the product of 'science' than
>>>>>>>> religion
>>>>>>>> and so its progeny, global warming, nuclear waste, chemical poisoning
>>>>>>>> and polluting of the water, air and earth and the trivialization &
>>>>>>>> brutalization of the individual are the fault of science, not
>>>>>>>> religion.
>>>>>>>> And don't even get me started on architecture:)
>
>>>>>>> Well, if you want to go back to living in a cave, be my guest.
>
>>>>>> I always find it vastly amusing when an anti-science crank complains
>>>>>> about science being evil and uses a computer to transmit the message
>>>>>> to others. Â Such idiots deserve to live in a world of 12th century
>>>>>> technology.
>
>>>>> True. Next time he should post messenger pigeon or smoke signals.
>
>>>> Chances are he would be illiterate, and the Church would do its best to keep
>>>> him that way.
>
>>> That's right. The Church tried to keep a monopoly on knowledge. That
>>> made it easier to control the sheep.
>>> --
>>> John #1782- Hide quoted text -
>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>
>>I agree that is totally true. Now, scientific analysis of crowds,
>>behavioral responses, flows of memes/slogans/logos, consumer
>>statistics, video editing, sound bytes, think tanks, MKULTRA, ectera
>>ectera did nothing whatsoever to make sheep-control as easy as
>>pressing a button...
>
>>Playa please... religion AND science can be used to do anything, from
>>giving people great options for internal and external evolution and
>>creation of new ideas, new cultures, new technologies and new ways of
>>co-existence all the way to whole sale slaughter or precision bombs
>>and those statistical analyses of defective parts in products that
>>decide whether or not it's cost effective to enact recalls of
>>potentially leathal products.
>
>>You there Shut the fuck up until you can see all sides and then some,
>>then post your drivel.
>
>>I am a Giant you are are a liliputian.
>
> You are a loon.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Right from the the Moon! and several au's from dad.