|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Joseph LittleshoesJoseph Littleshoes Date: May 22, 2008 13:31
After all, what is the most 'religion' can do? warp peoples minds and
hearts? get them to believe in and act on 'moral' ideals that may
include the slaughter of those who do not share precisely the same
ideals (shiite vs. sunni?).
Now "Science" and of course by that i mean the products of the
'scientific method' are the source of the tools that the religious or
atheist fanatic would need to oppress the masses.
The industrial revolution is more the product of 'science' than religion
and so its progeny, global warming, nuclear waste, chemical poisoning
and polluting of the water, air and earth and the trivialization &
brutalization of the individual are the fault of science, not religion.
And don't even get me started on architecture:)
And of course the real demon there is probly more 'human nature' than
either science or religion which ultimately are just coping mechanisms
for dealing with a hostile environment.
--
JL
|
| |
|
| | 92 Comments |
|
  |
Author: mikamika Date: May 22, 2008 13:51
On May 22, 1:31 pm, Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
> After all, what is the most 'religion' can do?
Incite mass genocide.
Or maybe just a random "honor killing" or two or a hundred.
Idiot.
> The industrial revolution is more the product of 'science' than religion
> and so its progeny, global warming, nuclear waste, chemical poisoning
> and polluting of the water, air and earth and the trivialization &
> brutalization of the individual are the fault of science, not religion.
Let's not forget clean water, sanitation, medicine, communication and
the advancement of personal liberty, to name a few.
Are you claiming you do not partake in any of those benefits of
science? If so, you're a fucking liar. If not, you're a fucking
hypocrite.
> And of course the real demon there is probly more 'human nature'
Probably?
You are such a tool. But apparently you're begging for abuse, so,
keep posting these ridiculous diatribes and you'll be sure to get it.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mark K. BilboMark K. Bilbo Date: May 22, 2008 18:27
Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
> After all, what is the most 'religion' can do?
Kill.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: TomTom Date: May 22, 2008 22:00
> On May 22, 1:31 pm, Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>>
>> The industrial revolution is more the product of 'science' than religion
>> and so its progeny, global warming, nuclear waste, chemical poisoning
>> and polluting of the water, air and earth and the trivialization &
>> brutalization of the individual are the fault of science, not religion.
>
> Let's not forget clean water, sanitation, medicine, communication and
> the advancement of personal liberty, to name a few.
Life of Brian, Scene 9:
REG:
They've bled us white, the bastards. They've taken everything we had, and
not just from us, from our fathers, and from our fathers' fathers.
LORETTA:
And from our fathers' fathers' fathers.
REG:...
|
| Show full article (2.33Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: johacjohac Date: May 22, 2008 22:47
In article <4835D838.6000702@ isp.com>,
Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
> After all, what is the most 'religion' can do? warp peoples minds and
> hearts? get them to believe in and act on 'moral' ideals that may
> include the slaughter of those who do not share precisely the same
> ideals (shiite vs. sunni?).
>
> Now "Science" and of course by that i mean the products of the
> 'scientific method' are the source of the tools that the religious or
> atheist fanatic would need to oppress the masses.
>
> The industrial revolution is more the product of 'science' than religion
> and so its progeny, global warming, nuclear waste, chemical poisoning
> and polluting of the water, air and earth and the trivialization &
> brutalization of the individual are the fault of science, not religion.
> And don't even get me started on architecture:)
|
| Show full article (1.14Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: MikeMike Date: May 22, 2008 23:16
On May 23, 1:47 am, johac remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> In article <4835D838.6000...@ isp.com>,
> Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
>
>> After all, what is the most 'religion' can do? warp peoples minds and
>> hearts? get them to believe in and act on 'moral' ideals that may
>> include the slaughter of those who do not share precisely the same
>> ideals (shiite vs. sunni?).
>
>> Now "Science" and of course by that i mean the products of the
>> 'scientific method' are the source of the tools that the religious or
>> atheist fanatic would need to oppress the masses.
>
>> The industrial revolution is more the product of 'science' than religion
>> and so its progeny, global warming, nuclear waste, chemical poisoning
>> and polluting of the water, air and earth and the trivialization &
>> brutalization of the individual are the fault of science, not religion.
>> And don't even get me started on architecture:)
>
> Well, if you want to go back to living in a cave, be my guest. ...
|
| Show full article (1.48Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Richard AnackerRichard Anacker Date: May 22, 2008 23:21
Sers Mike et all
Mike schrieb:
> Such idiots deserve to live in a world of 12th century
> technology.
This would perfectly fit their state of mind.
--
"What did Evil Knievel want?"
"God sent him."
"On a fucking Suzuki?"
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: johacjohac Date: May 22, 2008 23:46
In article
l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
Mike hofstra.edu> wrote:
> On May 23, 1:47
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: thomas p.thomas p. Date: May 23, 2008 07:06
"Joseph Littleshoes" isp.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:4835D838.6000702@isp.com...
> After all, what is the most 'religion' can do? warp peoples minds and
> hearts? get them to believe in and act on 'moral' ideals that may
> include the slaughter of those who do not share precisely the same
> ideals (shiite vs. sunni?).
>
> Now "Science" and of course by that i mean the products of the
> 'scientific method' are the source of the tools that the religious or
> atheist fanatic would need to oppress the masses.
What in the world is an atheist fanatic? Your pretense of neutral
objectivity just blew up.
>
> The industrial revolution is more the product of 'science' than religion
> and so its progeny, global warming, nuclear waste, chemical poisoning
> and polluting of the water, air and earth and the trivialization &
> brutalization of the individual are the fault of science, not religion.
> And don't even get me started on architecture:)
|
| Show full article (1.66Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: thomas p.thomas p. Date: May 23, 2008 07:08
"johac" remove.sbcglobal.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:jhachmann-DC5322.23462222052008@news.giganews.com...
> In article
> l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
> Mike hofstra.edu> wrote:
>
>> On May 23, 1:47 am, johac remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> In article <4835D838.6000...@ isp.com>,
>>> Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> After all, what is the most 'religion' can do? warp peoples minds and
>>>> hearts? get them to believe in and act on 'moral' ideals that may
>>>> include the slaughter of those who do not share precisely the same
>>>> ideals (shiite vs. sunni?).
>>>
>>>> Now "Science" and of course by that i mean the products of the
>>>> 'scientific method' are the source of the tools that the religious or
>>>> atheist fanatic would need to oppress the masses.
>>>
>>>> The industrial revolution is more the product of 'science' than ...
|
| Show full article (2.03Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|