>> Vendicar Decarian wrote:

>>> There is no meaningful sample set to analyize.

>
>
> "Rev Turd Fredericks" catholic.org> wrote

>> You are completely clueless.

>
> Says the obvious liar.
>
> Odd that you prove yourself continually unable to support your comments
> with facts, in this case qualifying your aledged data sets.
>
> Ahahahahaha..... You are quite incompetent.
>

>>>>> So you are caught in yet another lie.

>>> "Rev Turd Fredericks" catholic.org> wrote

>>>> I'm afraid not tardboy.

>>> Vendicar Decarian wrote:
>>> Denial of telling a lie is in fact telling another lie.

>
>
> "Rev Turd Fredericks" catholic.org> wrote

>> Which is in it's self a lie.

>
> And now you decend into rank stupidity. When you have told a lie, and then
> deny it, your denial is indeed another lie.
>
> You claim that the above statement is itself a lie, is in fact another lie
> on your part.
>
> Ahahahahaha..... You are quite incompetent.
>
>

>>> Vendicar Decarian wrote:

>>>>> So name your publications Turd. Name One. You must remember a
>>>>> single
>>>>> title.

>>>
>>> "Rev Turd Fredericks" catholic.org> wrote

>>>> Not for you.

>>> Illustrating yet another one of your lies. - that you have written
>>> anything.
>>>
>>> Ahahahahahahah....
>>>
>>> Name your publications Turd. Name 1. You must remember a single
>>> title.

>
>
> "Rev Turd Fredericks" catholic.org> wrote

>> I remember all the titles, I'm just not telling them to you. That bothers
>> you doesn't it? Tough break.

>
> Now how could you remember all the titles, when your claim was that you
> didn't remember how many papers you had written?
>
> Are we to presume that you can't count?
>
> Ahahahahaha... You fucking Liar.
>
>
>

>> Yep, somewhere around 10.

>
> Somewhere? Somewhere up your ass.
>
> What are the titles. I ask again for the 20th time.
>
>
>

>>> "Rev Turd Fredericks" catholic.org> wrote

>>>> I don't use my real identity on usenet for many reasons and none of them
>>>> are your business.

>>> You are in a public forum ShitLicker.... All of them are my business.

>
>
> "Rev Turd Fredericks" catholic.org> wrote

>> Nope, none of them are your business. In fact, your business is to say
>> "Thank you, please come again" How was the quickie mart today Apu? You
>> just get home from work or did you just get up in the morning?

>
> Everything you do in public is my business. Cocksucker.
>
> What you say, wear, eat, the way you walk, your shit stained fingers, and
> your dung sented breath are all my business, since they all impact upon me
> when you are in public.
>
> So your refusal to provide your own name here is most certainly my
> business, as is your continual stream of lies and obfuscation.
>

>>> Vendicar Decarian wrote:

>>>>> You can't do the experimental design unless you know how the scans
>>>>> are done, what tracer you are using. If you had any background in
>>>>> radiology then you would know the typical gamma spectrum presented by
>>>>> the tracer.

>>> "Rev Turd Fredericks" catholic.org> wrote

>>>> It is simply not important to me.

>
> Vendicar Decarian wrote;

>>> Ahahahahahaahah.... Then you are incompetent.

>

>>> "Rev Turd Fredericks" catholic.org> wrote

>> Why is that? Your understanding of science is so poor, you don't even know
>> how papers are written.

>
> Quite simply because a researcher who claims to perform research on data
> and who also claims that the methods by which the data is obtained is "not
> important", is an incompetent researcher who is incapable of proper data
> accessment and analysis.
>
> Vendicar Decarian wrote:

>>> You have no data set to statistically analyze MotherFucker.

>
> "Rev Turd Fredericks" catholic.org> wrote

>> How would you know that dumbass?

>
> Because there are no statistical datasets to be obtained from a Pet scan
> you incompetent lying MotherFucker.
>
> NONE.
>
> Name your publications Turd. Name 1. You must remember a single
> title.
>
> Ahahahahaha... You fucking Liar.
>
>