blu wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:52:33 -0700 Douglas
cox.net> exploded
> onto the scene and screamed incoherantly:
>
> >>
>>blu wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:01:14 -0700 "Erwin Hessle"
erwinhessle.com>
>>>exploded onto the scene and screamed incoherantly:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>blu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:43:57 -0700 "Erwin Hessle"
erwinhessle.com>
>>>>>exploded onto the scene and screamed incoherantly:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>blu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:08:59 -0700 "Erwin Hessle"
erwinhessle.com>
>>>>>>>exploded onto the scene and screamed incoherantly:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>blu wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:08:50 -0700 "Erwin Hessle"
>>>>>>>>>
erwinhessle.com> exploded onto the scene and screamed
>>>>>>>>>incoherantly:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>blu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:40:17 -0700 "Erwin Hessle"
>>>>>>>>>>>
erwinhessle.com> exploded onto the scene and screamed
>>>>>>>>>>>incoherantly:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>blu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:54:00 -0700 "Rosifer"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
tpg.com.au> exploded onto the scene and screamed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>incoherantly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>blu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:57:57 -0700 "Rosifer"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
tpg.com.au> exploded onto the scene and screamed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>incoherantly:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Carter lies because that is his nature, not because he has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the right to be a Welshman who cannot speak Welsh, and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>name of whose home town, "where his heart is" he cannot seem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to spell.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hey- this is usenet. It's a playground, not the secret society
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of mages and sages. If you want that, fine. Buckle down and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>build yourself a website or a forum and restrict the use.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How is that relevant as to the fact of Archie being a liar?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>/sigh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Because this is a playground. Roll playing is an accepted mode of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>play.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Role-playing and telling great big whopping lies while pretending
>>>>>>>>>>>>that you are not are two different things.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>How so?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Let me see if I can put the difference in a way simple enough for you
>>>>>>>>>>to understand.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Role-playing is role-playing. Telling great big whopping lies while
>>>>>>>>>>pretending that you are not is telling great big whopping lies while
>>>>>>>>>>pretending that you are not.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Lemme look something up for you. Hold on.
>>>>>>>>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-playing_game
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Now, you see that the definition of roll playing states:
>>>>>>>>>A role-playing game (RPG, often roleplaying game) is a type of game in
>>>>>>>>>which the participants assume the roles of characters and
>>>>>>>>>collaboratively create stories. Participants determine the actions of
>>>>>>>>>their characters based on their characterization, and the actions
>>>>>>>>>succeed or fail according to a formal system of rules and guidelines.
>>>>>>>>>Within the rules, they may improvise freely; their choices shape the
>>>>>>>>>direction and outcome of the games.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I'm sorry if the definition isn't what you'd like. Take it up with
>>>>>>>>>wiki.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You are the master of irrelevance, as always.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You just called me a master!! *smeps* :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Glad you agree.
>>>>>
>>>>>I might just have to steal that. blu 3=3 "master of irrelevance" I like
>>>>>that, E. Keep it up and my sig will have nothing but Hessle quotes in it.
>>>>>:) But.. should I change it to "mistress"? I am female.. are there female
>>>>>masters?
>>>>
>>>>Master suits your picture better than mistress does.
>>>
>>>
>>>Oooh.. low blow!! Alright then, master it is.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>Feel free at any time to address the point I made, rather than the
>>>>>>>>one you dreamt I made.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That was the one you made.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There's your imagination again.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nope.
>>>>
>>>>And again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>See the difference there? Subtle, I know, but keep at it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>/yawn/scratch/stretch
>>>>>>>>>You were saying?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yup, that's your attention span in a nutshell.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hmm Hmmm Doo Doooo Doooooo Hmmmm Hmmmmm... etc
>>>>>>
>>>>>>See?
>>>>>
>>>>>Ayup.
>>>>
>>>>Right then.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>You've just been taking this stuff way too seriously.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, the fucking irony.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I quit taking usenet seriously about 5 years ago.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>No, you didn't. You're imagining this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Now I'm curious. (I've answered this from bottom to top.. so excuse the
>>>>>>>>>out of whack-ness of that statement)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why do you think I'm imagining that I don't take this seriously?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That appears to be how you deal with the rest of your life, why should
>>>>>>>>this be any different for you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now you're suggesting I take *life* seriously??? Come on!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What are you so frightened of?
>>>>>
>>>>>Nothing. What are you so uptight about?
>>>>
>>>>What makes you so frightened that you'd ask such a thing?
>>>
>>>
>>>E, there is nothing to be frightened of. You live, you die. In between
>>>it's a series of adventures, learning experiences and such. Nothing to be
>>>frightened of. Absolutely nothing.
>>>
>>
>>Heh, you have no fear of landing in jail and kicking there?
>>
>>Liar.
>
>
>
> NONE. Zero. Nada.
>
>
>>You have no fear of getting jacked for your drugs from some
>>street thug... which is not far from reality in the bay area?
>>You have no fear of being raped, which 1 in five women will be?
>>
>>You are a liar.
>
>
> Err.. Doug? I don't buy dope on the street. Your point is moot.
>
Dodged the rape statistic. Why is that? Already been there, done
that?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>It's a game, E. Nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>more. Some entertainment that only costs $10 a month (plus
>>>>>>>>>>>cable i'net connection fees). I'm sorry if this is disturbing
>>>>>>>>>>>to you. That wasn't my intent.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>You aren't fooling anyone, you know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I'm not? Awww.. shame. :/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nevertheless, let me see if I have got this right;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It is Carter's right to be a compulsive liar and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fraud. It is my right to let people know that. And it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is your right to whine about the situation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I seriouly doubt I was whining. It's not my style.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ha... style... good one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>My style? Heh. I've got such a unique style that right at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>this very moment I'm being forged and copied in several
>>>>>>>>>>>>>groups. People *like* me, Rosifer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>People have always acted like dull idiots, I don't think you
>>>>>>>>>>>>can take the credit for that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Pshaw, E. You know you love me. Come on, admit it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>You're not seriously trying to tell me that you disagree with
>>>>>>>>>>my characterization of you as an idiot, are you? Even you have
>>>>>>>>>>to recognize this yourself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I'm far from an idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You don't think your IQ even reaches idiot levels?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Interesting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's for me to know, dear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, it's for me to know, and for you to imagine about.
>>>>>
>>>>>Alright.
>>>>
>>>>Yup.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If I ever choose to prove it in a.m. I'll ping you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I won't be holding my breath.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please don't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Till then.. well.. I see you don't disagree that you love me.
>>>>>>>>>/huggles up to E.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>See? This *can* be fun..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You'd better clean those flakes up, because I'm not doing it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>/me brushes E's shoulder off and snuggles closer This is nice, E.
>>>>>>>Why haven't we done this before now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Ask your imagination.
>>>>>
>>>>>Cuz yer scared? No need, it's my roommate who bites, not me.
>>>>
>>>>I meant your real imagination.
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm at a loss. If it's not your fear of being bitten, then what? Oh, I've
>>>got it!! Upon reading back, I see it. You're afraid of being "smitten" not
>>>bitten. My bad. I had the wrong beginning to the word.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But I see you don't disagree with the logical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>progression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>It's everyone's right to do as they damn well please.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Except for whining. That's irritating. Which is why I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>do it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>You're whining right now, about how Archie's lies don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>matter and how everyone should leave him alone, about how
>>>>>>>>>>>>there are no rules, yadda yadda yadda.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Please to show me where I asked/said everyone should leave him
>>>>>>>>>>>alone. I do not recall saying that. DC's a big boy. He can
>>>>>>>>>>>handle it. If not.. well.. /shrug
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Your attempts to mother him and protect him from evil suggests
>>>>>>>>>>that this characterization of your feelings on the matter is
>>>>>>>>>>about as high on the scale as the whoppers he usually tells.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Mother DC? Bwahaha!! He's (if the pic is to be believed)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Which it isn't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm glad to hear that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>old enough to be
>>>>>>>>>my daddy!! How silly, E!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Again, who do you think you are fooling, here?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Not trying to fool anyone.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>This is also in your imagination.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nope.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So's that.
>>>>>
>>>>>Not.
>>>>
>>>>And that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>What you actually meant was it's irritating when other
>>>>>>>>>>>>people whine, but it's perfectly OK when you do it, right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So where is the problem?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Apparently with you. You can't seem to grasp the fact
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that this is usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Does this have something to do with the arbitrary rules
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you seem to cook up?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rules? No rules, darlin'. The alt. hierarchy is an acronym.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Anarchists, Lunatics and Terrorists. Now, since 9/11, maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the 'terrorists' part is slightly frowned upon, but at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>usenet's birth, the world was a different place.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nym-changing = good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Post-editing = ungood
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Exposing Carter's lies =double ungood
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Post editing is childishly mundane.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Except for whining. That's irritating. Which is why I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>do it."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Hypo crite.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>/passes E some tea with lemon and honey
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>For your cough.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"For cough" yourself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I hace the codine cough syrup. But thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Straight over your head, eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>More like straight to the head.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just not your head.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh ya, my head alright. I've been buzzed all day. Codeine. Mmmm..
>>>>
>>>>Or maybe a different head.
>>>
>>>
>>>??????????
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Childish" as opposed to, say, pathetically banal and
>>>>>>>>>>>>ineffectual trolling, or claiming multiple times to have
>>>>>>>>>>>>"spanked" someone in a newsgroup three fucking years ago?
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Childish" like that, you mean?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I've never claimed my trolling tactics were good. I suck as a
>>>>>>>>>>>troll. But, it's fun.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>So you admit your trolling is "childishly mundane" then?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Sure.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And you don't see any problem with acting in a "childishly
>>>>>>>>mundane" way?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nope.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Right, so you'll be quitting your incessant whining about
>>>>>>post-editing then.
>>>>>
>>>>>Is that what you'd like, E?
>>>>
>>>>No, what I'd like is your answer to the question. That's why I asked it.
>>>>
>>>>See how these things work pretty logically if you think really hard
>>>>about them?
>>>
>>>
>>>Alright, my sweet. If you like, I shall never mention your post editing
>>>again. Are you happy now?
>>>
>>
>>It was a stupid arbitrary rule to begin with that none here
>>followed only your butt monkies did.
>
>
> Well of course! Do catch up, silly boy..
>
I was up to speed long before you got here... which is why
you and your buttmonkies attempt at trolling was so obviously
transparent. But you and the trolls sure whined on and on and on
about not following your ridiculous rules.
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The simple fact is that you folks don't like "post-editing"
>>>>>>>>>>>>because none of you are smart enough to counter it. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>leaves your troll tactics in tatters, which upsets your
>>>>>>>>>>>>self-images greatly. As I've said before, trolls who whine
>>>>>>>>>>>>when others don't play by their rules are useless wasters
>>>>>>>>>>>>who take their so-called trolling way too seriously.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"You've just been taking this stuff way too seriously."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you (general, not personal) can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>come up with a reply to the original, then move along.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Rules? No rules, darlin'."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Now, where did I just hear that?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I don't know. Where?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>See if you can guess.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Well, I said it once or twice. Is that what you're referring to?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That yer a cutie?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yup, that sounds like the kind of thing that floats around in your
>>>>>>head.
>>>>>
>>>>>You're not a cutie?
>>>>
>>>>This is not a word I would use to describe myself, no.
>>>
>>>
>>>How would you describe yourself?
>>>
>>
>>Why do you care. Do appearances make a difference in how you
>>deal with people? H
>
>
> Curiosity. Nothing more. How would YOU describe yourself, Douglas?
>
Male, 42 y/o with interests in art, music and books.
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>If there are no rules to stop you, then there are no rules to
>>>>>>>>>>>help
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>you, either. Deal with it, and quit your whining.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>LOL!! You got it!! I'm happy for you, E!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>See? You have absolutely no perception at all of what gets said
>>>>>>>>>>to you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No, I turn it whichever way I choose. Difference.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>See? You have absolutely no perception at all of what gets said to
>>>>>>>>you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Oh, I perceive it alright, I just answer it in my own way. If you'd
>>>>>>>actually look, rather than react, you'd see that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, if you'd actually look, rather than imagine, you'd see.
>>>>>
>>>>>See what? You said "If there are no rules to stop you, then there are
>>>>>no rules to help you, either. Deal with it, and quit your whining."
>>>>>
>>>>>I replied to that "LOL!! You got it!! I'm happy for you, E!!" which was
>>>>>stating my eternal joy at you finally perceiving the no rules thingie.
>>>>>
>>>>>Since I'm the one saying there are no rules, naturally I don't expect
>>>>>any to suddenly appear to "help me". (What do I need help with?)
>>>>>
>>>>>What am I not grasping here?
>>>>
>>>>Right, that's a question you need to start asking yourself more often.
>>>>
>>>>In this case, it's the fact that you are bitching about people not
>>>>following your rules whilst simultaneously claiming to eschew rules,
>>>>which is the behaviour of a flaky nut bar.
>>>
>>>
>>>No!! You've gotten it all wrong.
>>>
>>
>>NOt at all... it's exactly what you and your buttmonkies have
>>been doing for the last month.
>
>
>
> Now I have buttmonkies!!! Wow!!! That's so cool ... :)
>
If you like to think so.
>
>>>>>>>>>>So are you going to quit your whining, or not?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I'm not whining.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yes you are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nope.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Still whining.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Honest.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No you aren't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I'm sitting here laughing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>There's no law against whining and laughing at the same time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But you'd choke!! It would be a sound only dogs could hear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Good job you're typing then.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh you silly thing. You just wanna make me laugh, don't you?
>>>>
>>>>Do I?
>>>
>>>
>>>Evidently.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Other than this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>aspect of it, it can be a very creative exercise if done
>>>>>>>>>>>>>with some thought and some imagination.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>As for exposing Carter's lies, well.. why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Why not? If you come into a public forum and compulsively
>>>>>>>>>>>>tell one great big obvious fucking porky after another then
>>>>>>>>>>>>you have no grounds for complaint when people expose them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Rules? No rules, darlin'."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"You've just been taking this stuff way too seriously."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>You appear to have a problem with consistency. I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>"flaky" is the appropriate term here.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Sure. Why not? I'll take that one for $800, Alex.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Great, send me the check.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Do you take PayPal?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No, send by carrier pigeon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Owl?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, p-i-g-e-o-n.
>>>>>
>>>>>Enchanted butterfly?
>>>
>>>
>>>Oh. I don't have one of them. Sorry.
>>
>>Yes, having books or references is probably pretty foreign to
>>you.
>
>
> I do not have a pideon, silly. I have a bunch of dictionaries, two on my
> desk and a thesaurus. Plus the little icon that connects to the MIT online
> one.
>
> What's your excuse for over-using the word twat?
It's fits you perfectly and you admitted that you are one.
One needs no more reason than the above to use the appropriate
word to describe a particular person, in this case you and twat
which are now synonymous.
-Douglas
