On Aug 14, 4:21Â pm, Al Smith
address.com> wrote:>> "Al Smith"
address.com> wrote in messagenews:%%6Bok.6825$%%b7.5985@edtnps82...>>>> "Al Smith"
address.com> wrote in messagenews:9%%uok.7274$nu6.4995@edtnps83...>>>>>> "Al Smith"
address.com> wrote in messagenews:xikok.6998$nu6.4458@edtnps83...>
>>>>>>> I was on vacation. Just got back. That's the reason my name hasn't been appearing in the groups for the past week or so.
>
>>>>>>> -Al-
>
>
>>>>> I'm not quite sure what you're getting at, Leo.
>
>>>>> -Al-
>
>>>> I am not getting at anything, just showing part of the "index of coincidence" I made for the number 93.
>
>>> OK. If you are not getting at anything, that would explain why I didn't see what you were getting at.
>
>>> -Al-
>
>> 93 is of interest in certain magick circles, magick being a subject I thought you were interested in.I found it curious that that there were two specific references to flight 93, one of them being a mathematical construct that I designed for a completely different use.
>
> Aleister Crowley's emphasis on the number 93 has always seemed
> idiosyncratic to me -- we don't encounter much concerning 93 in
> Kabbalistic texts before Crowley's time, no more than we find on
> many other numbers. Numbers such as 36 and 72 are a great deal more
> important in Kabbalah.
>
> I suppose how we view 93 depends on how much importance we place in
> the cult of Thelema, and how much credence we give Crowley as the
> herald of a new aeon. My own view of Kabbalistic numerology is that
> it is useful for stimulating connections between ideas, chains of
> thought, and even on occasion for initiating insights, but that it
> should not be raised to a level of importance that it does not
> deserve. Crowley himself felt much the same way about it.
>
> -Al-
Here in Jack land we gots lots of 93's, 418's, 111's, 333's, 616's,
666's, and the occasional 273 and 13013...
