Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.magick only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.magick Profile…
 Up
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?         


Author: Sniper .308
Date: Jan 2, 2008 10:51

On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:48:25 -0800 (PST), RedDog
budweiser.com> wrote:

You call your forgery proof faggot, nah, this is proof:

Damn those pesky IDENTICAL NNTP's, eh Blobby? Google is not your
friend, suckboy.

Seriously Blobby we all know you love shit eating and you are just
projecting that point on to others, so why don't you tell us why you
love it so much

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.flame.faggots/msg/6f75da6958c7630e...
Show full article (3.54Kb)
346 Comments
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?         


Author: Robert Baer
Date: Jan 2, 2008 19:07

What is it with all this barfy language?
The answer to "Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation
Of The Bible?" is:
There is *NO* "perfect translation" of *ANY* text from one language
to another; it is not possible.
Idioms get lost and/or mangled.
References to things or events that are local and/or recent AT THAT
TIME are gibberished even more.
Concepts known and understood due to the culture AT THAT TIME also get
mangled or worse.

Hell, even the Muslim concept "Allah is with me" gets mangled by the
Muslims, to the extreme that "it is OK to kill oneself for excuse>" on the "theory" that dead or alive, "Allah is with me".
Well, that statement is true, but....
In Roman Catholic terms, it is a mortal sin to kill oneself; it is
even worse than to kill another.

So, while one states that blah blah is right, and another states that
blah blah is wrong, remember: both are right and both are wrong - at the
same time and on occasion on the same exact point(s).
Show full article (1.09Kb)
36 Comments
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?         


Author: Richard Henry
Date: Jan 2, 2008 19:13

"Robert Baer" localnet.com> wrote in message
news:13nok85bb6jq448@corp.supernews.com...
> In Roman Catholic terms, it is a mortal sin to kill oneself; it is
> even worse than to kill another.

In Roman Catholic tersm, what is worse than a mortal sin?
no comments
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?         


Date: Jan 2, 2008 19:18

"Robert Baer" localnet.com> wrote in message
news:13nok85bb6jq448@corp.supernews.com...
> What is it with all this barfy language?
> The answer to "Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of
> The Bible?" is:
> There is *NO* "perfect translation" of *ANY* text from one language to
> another; it is not possible.
> Idioms get lost and/or mangled.
> References to things or events that are local and/or recent AT THAT TIME
> are gibberished even more.
> Concepts known and understood due to the culture AT THAT TIME also get
> mangled or worse.
>

ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.
There is no way to translate modern German to modern English.

But, the KJV is the greatest piece of English literature ever Witten,
whether accurate or not.
Show full article (0.88Kb)
23 Comments
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?         


Date: Jan 2, 2008 19:36

"Richard Henry" home.com> wrote in message
news:LpYej.33226$Rf5.21253@newsfe13.phx...
>
> "Robert Baer" localnet.com> wrote in message
> news:13nok85bb6jq448@corp.supernews.com...
>> In Roman Catholic terms, it is a mortal sin to kill oneself; it is
>> even worse than to kill another.
>
> In Roman Catholic tersm, what is worse than a mortal sin?
>

Ref: RCC, Who cares.
no comments
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?         


Author: Don Bowey
Date: Jan 2, 2008 20:07

On 1/2/08 7:13 PM, in article LpYej.33226$Rf5.21253@newsfe13.phx, "Richard
Henry" home.com> wrote:
>
> "Robert Baer" localnet.com> wrote in message
> news:13nok85bb6jq448@corp.supernews.com...
>> In Roman Catholic terms, it is a mortal sin to kill oneself; it is
>> even worse than to kill another.
>
> In Roman Catholic tersm, what is worse than a mortal sin?
>
>
>

Probably it's not putting enough cash in the collection plate.
no comments
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?         


Author: Meltdarok
Date: Jan 3, 2008 09:26

vernon O wrote, On 1/2/2008 10:18 PM:
> "Robert Baer" localnet.com> wrote in message
> news:13nok85bb6jq448@corp.supernews.com...
>> What is it with all this barfy language?
>> The answer to "Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of
>> The Bible?" is:
>> There is *NO* "perfect translation" of *ANY* text from one language to
>> another; it is not possible.
>> Idioms get lost and/or mangled.
>> References to things or events that are local and/or recent AT THAT TIME
>> are gibberished even more.
>> Concepts known and understood due to the culture AT THAT TIME also get
>> mangled or worse.
>>
>
>
> ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.
> There is no way to translate modern German to modern English.
>
> But, the KJV is the greatest piece of English literature ever Witten, ...
Show full article (2.54Kb)
no comments
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?         


Author: Richard Henry
Date: Jan 3, 2008 09:31

On Jan 3, 9:26 am, Meltdarok aol.com> wrote:
> vernon O wrote, On 1/2/2008 10:18 PM:
>
>
>
>
>
>> "Robert Baer" localnet.com> wrote in message
>>news:13nok85bb6jq448@corp.supernews.com...
>>>   What is it with all this barfy language?
>>>   The answer to "Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of
>>> The Bible?" is:
>>>   There is *NO* "perfect translation" of *ANY* text from one language to
>>> another; it is not possible.
>>>   Idioms get lost and/or mangled.
>>>   References to things or events that are local and/or recent AT THAT TIME
>>> are gibberished even more.
>>>  Concepts known and understood due to the culture AT THAT TIME also get
>>> mangled or worse.
> ...
Show full article (2.60Kb)
no comments
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?         


Author: Rich Grise
Date: Jan 3, 2008 10:00

On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:56:05 -0800, No One wrote:
> Don Bowey comcast.net> writes:
>> On 1/2/08 8:24 PM, in article 878x375yed.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net, "No
>> One" nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:
>>> Don Bowey comcast.net> writes:
>>>>> In Roman Catholic tersm, what is worse than a mortal sin?
>>>>
>>>> Probably it's not putting enough cash in the collection plate.
>>>
>>> Or using Windows. :-)
>>
>> Well........ Windows2K and Vista for sure.
>>
>> But XP runs as well on my Mac as it does on my PCs. Maybe Bill G
>> bought forbearance for XP.
>
> The RC Church should love what I'm running - Linux. When you aren't
> paying Bill Gates or Apple a dime, that leaves more for the collection
> plate (not that I've ever contributed to it).
Show full article (1.11Kb)
no comments
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?         


Author: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
Date: Jan 3, 2008 10:04

On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:18:55 -0700, vernon O wrote:
> "Robert Baer" localnet.com> wrote in message
> news:13nok85bb6jq448@corp.supernews.com...
>> What is it with all this barfy language? The answer to "Is The King
>> James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of
>> The Bible?" is:
>> There is *NO* "perfect translation" of *ANY* text from one language
>> to
>> another; it is not possible.
>> Idioms get lost and/or mangled.
>> References to things or events that are local and/or recent AT THAT
>> TIME
>> are gibberished even more.
>> Concepts known and understood due to the culture AT THAT TIME also get
>> mangled or worse.
>
> ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.
> There is no way to translate modern German to modern English.
>
> But, the KJV is the greatest piece of English literature ever Witten, ...
Show full article (1.28Kb)
7 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9