|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: Erwin HessleErwin Hessle Date: May 4, 2008 09:40
On May 4, 12:19 pm, "Rick, M.A." anywhere.com> wrote:> The Article of the Week selected for this week describes a study that tests
> the reliability and predictive qualities of a test of implicit associations
> (Implicit Associations Test, or IAT). My commentary, as always, explains how
> the reading relates to neuromagick theory.
Your commentary, as always, should help you identify the mistakes
you're making, if only you paid any attention to it.
Here's a good example:
"Carrying the example forward, subtly expressed sub-elements of a
facial expression (say a slightly furrowed brow) might trigger
negative feelings that have been previously associated with anger,
even in the absence of other features of an angry face, and even if
the furrowed brow does not register in conscious thoughts at all."
|
| Show full article (2.27Kb) |
| 8 Comments |
|
|
Author: The Speaking ClockThe Speaking Clock Date: May 5, 2008 09:12
On 4 May, 18:40, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:> On May 4, 12:19 pm, "Rick, M.A." anywhere.com> wrote:
>>> The Article of the Week selected for this week describes a study that tests
>> the reliability and predictive qualities of a test of implicit associations
>> (Implicit Associations Test, or IAT). My commentary, as always, explains how
>> the reading relates to neuromagick theory.
>
> Your commentary, as always, should help you identify the mistakes
> you're making, if only you paid any attention to it.
>
> Here's a good example:
>
> "Carrying the example forward, subtly expressed sub-elements of a
> facial expression (say a slightly furrowed brow) might trigger
> negative feelings that have been previously associated with anger,
> even in the absence of other features of an angry face, and even if
> the furrowed brow does not register in conscious thoughts at all."
>
> What you apparently want to say is that these "subtly expressed sub- ...
|
| Show full article (2.77Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Erwin HessleErwin Hessle Date: May 5, 2008 12:08
On May 5, 12:12 pm, The Speaking Clock live.co.uk>
wrote:> On 4 May, 18:40, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On May 4, 12:19 pm, "Rick, M.A." anywhere.com> wrote:>
>>> The Article of the Week selected for this week describes a study that tests
>>> the reliability and predictive qualities of a test of implicit associations
>>> (Implicit Associations Test, or IAT). My commentary, as always, explains how
>>> the reading relates to neuromagick theory.
>
>> Your commentary, as always, should help you identify the mistakes
>> you're making, if only you paid any attention to it.
>
>> Here's a good example:
>
>> "Carrying the example forward, subtly expressed sub-elements of a
>> facial expression (say a slightly furrowed brow) might trigger ...
|
| Show full article (3.55Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: The Speaking ClockThe Speaking Clock Date: May 5, 2008 13:37
On 5 May, 21:08, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:> On May 5, 12:12 pm, The Speaking Clock live.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On 4 May, 18:40, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:>
>>> On May 4, 12:19 pm, "Rick, M.A." anywhere.com> wrote:>
>>>> The Article of the Week selected for this week describes a study that tests
>>>> the reliability and predictive qualities of a test of implicit associations
>>>> (Implicit Associations Test, or IAT). My commentary, as always, explains how
>>>> the reading relates to neuromagick theory.
>
>>> Your commentary, as always, should help you identify the mistakes
>>> you're making, if only you paid any attention to it.
> ...
|
| Show full article (4.56Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Erwin HessleErwin Hessle Date: May 5, 2008 13:52
On May 5, 4:37 pm, The Speaking Clock live.co.uk> wrote:> On 5 May, 21:08, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On May 5, 12:12 pm, The Speaking Clock live.co.uk>
>> wrote:>
>>> On 4 May, 18:40, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:>
>>>> On May 4, 12:19 pm, "Rick, M.A." anywhere.com> wrote:>
>>>>> The Article of the Week selected for this week describes a study that tests
>>>>> the reliability and predictive qualities of a test of implicit associations
>>>>> (Implicit Associations Test, or IAT). My commentary, as always, explains how
>>>>> the reading relates to neuromagick theory.
>
>>>> Your commentary, as always, should help you identify the mistakes
>>>> you're making, if only you paid any attention to it.
> ...
|
| Show full article (4.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: The Speaking ClockThe Speaking Clock Date: May 5, 2008 13:56
On 5 May, 22:52, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:> On May 5, 4:37 pm, The Speaking Clock live.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On 5 May, 21:08, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:>
>>> On May 5, 12:12 pm, The Speaking Clock live.co.uk>
>>> wrote:>
>>>> On 4 May, 18:40, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:>
>>>>> On May 4, 12:19 pm, "Rick, M.A." anywhere.com> wrote:>
>>>>>> The Article of the Week selected for this week describes a study that tests
>>>>>> the reliability and predictive qualities of a test of implicit associations
>>>>>> (Implicit Associations Test, or IAT). My commentary, as always, explains how
>>>>>> the reading relates to neuromagick theory. ...
|
| Show full article (5.13Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BassosBassos Date: Jul 4, 2008 13:24
> On 5 May, 21:08, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:>> On May 5, 12:12 pm, The Speaking Clock live.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> Interesting.... so when you feel threatened Mr Erwin (and let's face
> it here - the basis of all your arguments internet wide depend upon
> whatever justifys the entirety of your own cognitive style), you get
> your kicks off egowise by grandstanding to the group. And not only do
> you grandstand but in true predator style you think you can control
> the pack and say 'oh...that one looks a weak and easy kill'. Isn't
> that what you did with Corey Mr Erwin? How many countless others?
> The only thing you've...
|
| Show full article (1.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Joseph LittleshoesJoseph Littleshoes Date: Jul 4, 2008 17:11
Bassos wrote:
>
> You misunderstand Erwin.
>
> Anyone trying to *understand* a 8=3 is attempting futility.
Any one having the hubris to publicly express such a style and title and
expect it to be taken as anything more than a joke is worth little.
--
Joseph Littleshoes
"The two main political parties ruled alternately as if by tacit
agreement. Politically they were practically indistinguishable (one
perhaps a shade more liberal) but in both camps supporters were more
swayed by personalities than by issues. Both parties were heavily
dependent on the large industrial conglomerates. Corruption was
widespread, the conglomerates dictated economic policy, and with few
outstanding exceptions, politicians' reputations were low."
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Executive FunctionExecutive Function Date: Jul 5, 2008 01:25
On 4 Jul, 22:24, "Bassos" wrote:
>> On 5 May, 21:08, Erwin Hessle erwinhessle.com> wrote:>>> On May 5, 12:12 pm, The Speaking Clock live.co.uk>
>>> wrote:>
>> Interesting.... so when you feel threatened Mr Erwin (and let's face
>> it here - the basis of all your arguments internet wide depend upon
>> whatever justifys the entirety of your own cognitive style), you get
>> your kicks off egowise by grandstanding to the group. And not only do
>> you grandstand but in true predator style you think you can control
>> the pack and say 'oh...that one looks a weak and easy kill'. Isn't
>> that what you did with Corey Mr Erwin? How many countless others?
>> The only thing you've forgotten Mr Erwin is that you've been hiding
>> your tail between your legs for quite a while now. No-one thinks ...
|
| Show full article (2.16Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
