On 16 May, 22:46, HG wrote:
> Executive Function hotmail.com> writes:
>> On 16 May, 21:47, HG wrote:
>>> Executive Function hotmail.com> writes:
>>>> On 16 May, 21:04, HG wrote:
>>>>> Executive Function hotmail.com> writes:
>>>>>> On 16 May, 20:43, mika gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Like I said, when your errors are pointed out to you, instead of
>>>>>>> asking questions and reviewing the thread to gain some clarity,
>>>>>>> you try to divert the conversation, and when that doesn't work,
>>>>>>> you accuse others of taking the conversation too seriously or
>>>>>>> being too judgmental.
>>>>>> I'm surprised you ate the cookies. Â Let me see - any content beyond
>>>>>> the personal.... no. Â Right then, nothing to respond to. Â *yawn*
>
>>>>> Thank you for providing an exellent demonstration of the point Mika
>>>>> made.
>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â HG
>
>>>> Ah yes. Â The same girl who advised me to *be myself* and f*** what
>>>> anyone else thinks? Â :D Â You gotta love her. Â Really. Â :)
>
>>> Obviously you didn't understand what she was talking about.
>
>>> I'll tell you a story:
>
> [SNIP SNIP]
>
>>> "That train wants me to step off the tracks and give it room," the girl
>>> thought. Â "But I don't want to step off the tracks! Â I'll not give in,
>>> I'll stand my ground! No matter wh-" Â SPLAT! Â The train hit the girl, who
>>> was killed instantly.
>
>>> Now, what's the moral of this story?
>
>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â HG
>
>> That you-
>
> Â Â Â Â SPLAT!
>
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â HG- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Perhaps you'll reasemble in the morning. G'night. :D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*HOOOOOOwwwwlllll lolololol*