Author: AbsorbedAbsorbed Date: Sep 15, 2008 13:44
Bassos wrote:
> "Tom" comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:LOydnX80VsV05VPVnZ2dnUVZ_h2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> "Searles O'Dubhain" wrote in message
>> news:xKadnW-PQs-Qz1PVnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> "Tom" comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:WoydnT7HLrGumlPVnZ2dnUVZ_rzinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Religions that do not constantly seek truth are the problem and not
>>> religion itself. Otherwise there would be no Buddha to kill nor would
>>> there be a philosphy to mark the way. It is when a person goes beyond
>>> emotion and irrational fear that a chance for truth and understanding can
>>> occur. That is why Magick can be a religion.
>> Well, you see that's the problem. Religions *don't* constantly seek
>> truth. Religions constantly try to convince the world that they *already
>> have* the truth, no matter what evidence arises that demonstrates
>> otherwise. It is the very nature of religion to claim ownership of the
>> truth, to assert matters of faith as if they were matters of fact.
>
> From your presented page : ...
|