|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: CoreyWhiteCoreyWhite Date: Aug 23, 2006 12:37
All you have to do is convert audio files to photoshop image formats,
and play with blend filters to create radical music like they do in
holywood.
They just lay down the tracks in a mix in photoshop, and blend them
together, and play with them like artwork!!
The music mixers you buy in stores are great for some things, but if
you want to record multiple takes of your music, that are all basicly
the same, and then blend them together. Photoshop is the best tool you
can use. And if you understand what the music looks like in photoshop,
then you can do everything else with the tool too!!! This is what they
are doing in showbiz movie production!!!
|
| |
|
| | 49 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Onideus Mad HatterOnideus Mad Hatter Date: Aug 23, 2006 15:04
On 23 Aug 2006 12:37:07 -0700, CoreyWhite@ gmail.com wrote:
>All you have to do is convert audio files to photoshop image formats,
>and play with blend filters to create radical music like they do in
>holywood.
>
>They just lay down the tracks in a mix in photoshop, and blend them
>together, and play with them like artwork!!
>
>The music mixers you buy in stores are great for some things, but if
>you want to record multiple takes of your music, that are all basicly
>the same, and then blend them together. Photoshop is the best tool you
>can use. And if you understand what the music looks like in photoshop,
>then you can do everything else with the tool too!!! This is what they
>are doing in showbiz movie production!!!
Is "Corey White" Trackers real name or something?
--
|
| Show full article (2.71Kb) |
|
| | 46 Comments |
|
  |
Author: CoreyWhiteCoreyWhite Date: Aug 23, 2006 17:00
The project is listed on rentacoder.com now if anyone wants to work on
it.
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On 23 Aug 2006 12:37:07 -0700, CoreyWhite@ gmail.com wrote:
>
>>All you have to do is convert audio files to photoshop image formats,
>>and play with blend filters to create...
|
| Show full article (2.93Kb) |
| 45 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Onideus Mad HatterOnideus Mad Hatter Date: Aug 23, 2006 17:14
On 23 Aug 2006 17:00:35 -0700, CoreyWhite@ gmail.com wrote:
>The project is listed on rentacoder.com now if anyone wants to work on
>it.
Hey um...I'm not sure if anyone bothered to mention this to you or
not...but looking like a stupid fucking retard is NOT trolling...then
again, maybe that wasn't your intention. *shudder* It's creepy to
think that stupidity on that level not only exists in our universe,
but that it has a form of sentience behind it and the ability to type.
o_O
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
|
| Show full article (2.41Kb) |
| 44 Comments |
|
  |
Author: CoreyWhiteCoreyWhite Date: Aug 23, 2006 19:27
Convert WAV To BMP And Back
On RentaCoder one of the other coders thought I just wanted him to
change the extension from WAV to BMP. Another coder brought up the
complexities of actually converting WAVs to JPGs and back again,
because JPGs are compressed. And someone else asked me how they could
actually convert it. It is easiest if we work with BMPs and WAVs
because if we worked with BMP image files you just have to get into the
binary code of the file, and swap the headers around. So as long as
photoshop thinks the WAV is a BMP file you will be able to see what it
looks like and modify it. But I don't expect a representation that
looks like a graphical wav file. I expect a colorful psychedelic mess.
What I suggest is a simple command line interface that has all the
fields for the headers as boxes for input. The number of colors in the
image, the height and width, etc. And all the fields for the type of
sound on the other. And then the user gets to make a manual switch.
|
| Show full article (4.82Kb) |
| 40 Comments |
|
  |
Author: CBFalconerCBFalconer Date: Aug 23, 2006 19:49
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>
... snip ...
>
> Hey um...I'm not sure if anyone bothered to mention this to you or
> not...but looking like a stupid fucking retard is NOT trolling...then
> again, maybe that wasn't your intention. *shudder* It's creepy to
> think that stupidity on that level not only exists in our universe,
> but that it has a form of sentience behind it and the ability to type.
... snip ...
PLONK
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Onideus Mad HatterOnideus Mad Hatter Date: Aug 23, 2006 20:32
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:49:37 -0400, CBFalconer yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>
>... snip ...
>>
>> Hey um...I'm not sure if anyone bothered to mention this to you or
>> not...but looking like a stupid fucking retard is NOT trolling...then
>> again, maybe that wasn't your intention. *shudder* It's creepy to
>> think that stupidity on that level not only exists in our universe,
>> but that it has a form of sentience behind it and the ability to type.
>... snip ...
>
>PLONK
Yeah if I were you I'd shut myself the fuck up too.
--
|
| Show full article (2.49Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: trippytrippy Date: Aug 24, 2006 00:47
> Convert WAV To BMP And Back
Why would you do that?
That can't be good for minimizing degradation of the signal. Reminds
me of Jeff Goldblum in "The Fly".
Then again, I accidently open shit up in jEdit from time to time and
it's okay. Of course, I'm not trying to combine shit together using
photoshop either. Pretty sure this one's not in the help files
anywhere. I think you're going to wreck both of your sound files and
photoshop but hey, I don't have photoshop so I could be wrong. But I
gotta admit, aside from pure curiosity aspect, I'm not loving this
idea a whole lot.
|
| Show full article (6.30Kb) |
| 39 Comments |
|
  |
Author: AragornAragorn Date: Aug 24, 2006 01:05
On Thursday 24 August 2006 09:47, trippy stood up and addressed the masses
in /comp.os.linux.misc/ as follows...:
>> Convert WAV To BMP And Back
>
> Why would you do that?
>
> That can't be good for minimizing degradation of the signal. Reminds
> me of Jeff Goldblum in "The Fly".
Great movie, and an interesting concept. ;-)
|
| Show full article (1.44Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Onideus Mad HatterOnideus Mad Hatter Date: Aug 24, 2006 01:51
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:47:00 -0500, trippy
tacoshells.com> wrote:
>> Convert WAV To BMP And Back
>Why would you do that?
>
>That can't be good for minimizing degradation of the signal. Reminds
>me of Jeff Goldblum in "The Fly".
Oh your God...I didn't think this thread could GET any more fuckin
stupid, but I have a bad feeling it's about to...
>Then again, I accidently open shit up in jEdit from time to time and
>it's okay. Of course, I'm not trying to combine shit together using
>photoshop either. Pretty sure this one's not in the help files
>anywhere. I think you're going to wreck both of your sound files and
>photoshop but hey, I don't have photoshop so I could be wrong. But I
>gotta admit, aside from pure curiosity aspect, I'm not loving this
>idea a whole lot.
In The Land of Fucking Stupid, attempting to open a sound file in
Photoshop will apparently 'wreck the program'...in *REALITY* though,
it won't recognize the file type and simply won't open it.
|
| Show full article (4.27Kb) |
| 31 Comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|