>"Searles O'Dubhain"

>> This reminds me of some of the early newsgroup word-bots from about 10
>> years ago. They seemed to be joint experiments between university computer
>> science and psychology departments or else the product of a demented
>> graduate student's mind.

>
>Arguing that a computer program doesn't do what it was programmed to is
>pointless... the question is whether or not the computers were making sense
>and no one could tell it.
>

>> I'm concerned that this one almost seems coherent with an emphasis on
>> *almost.*
>> Searles O'Dubhain

>
>Oh, I see... Tom is trolling about my posts again. At first I didn't
>understand how the level of responses could have been reduced to post
>trolling in one step.
>
>My post upsets him, but as he still needs to feel important, he trolls. Tom
>needs simple sentences...
>
>If Tom blocks my posts, then he will not see them. Perhaps Tom is, or feels
>he is a 'moderator' of this group, and that he needs to screen all of the
>posts... he still doesn't have to reply to my posts.
>
>Finally, I must apologize for the list to "Philip" gmail.com>
>for the consistent, off-topic drivel afforded by Tom. Tom is a troll.
>