Flaubert's requirements for happiness
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.magick only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.magick Profile…
 Up
Flaubert's requirements for happiness         


Author: Joseph Littleshoes
Date: Nov 5, 2007 19:48

To be stupid, and selfish, and to have good health are the three
requirements for happiness; though if stupidity is lacking, the others
are useless.
38 Comments
Re: Flaubert's requirements for happiness         


Author: Melkor
Date: Nov 6, 2007 18:14

On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:48:50 -0800, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
>
>
>To be stupid, and selfish, and to have good health are the three
>requirements for happiness; though if stupidity is lacking, the others
>are useless.

totally ridiculous
no comments
Re: Flaubert's requirements for happiness         


Author: Kisai
Date: Nov 6, 2007 18:43

On Nov 5, 9:48 pm, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
> To be stupid, and selfish, and to have good health are the three
> requirements for happiness; though if stupidity is lacking, the others
> are useless.

Do you have *any* friends whatsoever?
no comments
Re: Flaubert's requirements for happiness         


Author: Douglas
Date: Nov 6, 2007 20:03

> On Nov 5, 9:48 pm, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
>
>>To be stupid, and selfish, and to have good health are the three
>>requirements for happiness; though if stupidity is lacking, the others
>>are useless.

Well, at least joey has the stupidity requirement all locked up.

Must be sad to be you.

-Douglas
no comments
Re: Flaubert's requirements for happiness         


Author: Joseph Littleshoes
Date: Nov 7, 2007 05:50

Melkor wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:48:50 -0800, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>To be stupid, and selfish, and to have good health are the three
>>requirements for happiness; though if stupidity is lacking, the others
>>are useless.
>
>
>
> totally ridiculous

Given the amount of "happy" people here i suspect its more appropriate
than you realize.
--
JL
no comments
Re: Flaubert's requirements for happiness         


Author: Joseph Littleshoes
Date: Nov 7, 2007 05:51

Kisai wrote:
> On Nov 5, 9:48 pm, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
>
>>To be stupid, and selfish, and to have good health are the three
>>requirements for happiness; though if stupidity is lacking, the others
>>are useless.
>
>
> Do you have *any* friends whatsoever?
>

Why do you care?
--
JL
no comments
Re: Flaubert's requirements for happiness         


Author: Tom
Date: Nov 7, 2007 07:49

"Joseph Littleshoes" isp.com> wrote in message
news:d3cb7$4731c2e6$4396f6a9$29160@DIALUPUSA.NET...
> Kisai wrote:
>
>> On Nov 5, 9:48 pm, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
>>
>>>To be stupid, and selfish, and to have good health are the three
>>>requirements for happiness; though if stupidity is lacking, the others
>>>are useless.
>>
>>
>> Do you have *any* friends whatsoever?
>>
>
> Why do you care?
Show full article (0.74Kb)
no comments
Re: Flaubert's requirements for happiness         


Author: Kisai
Date: Nov 7, 2007 08:29

On Nov 7, 7:51 am, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
> Kisai wrote:
>> On Nov 5, 9:48 pm, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
>
>>>To be stupid, and selfish, and to have good health are the three
>>>requirements for happiness; though if stupidity is lacking, the others
>>>are useless.
>
>> Do you have *any* friends whatsoever?
>
> Why do you care?

Because I'm curious if a person with such the asinine point of view of
completely devaluing the worth of people could go against my notion of
common sense and actually entice some wretched, like creature with a
modicum of friendship.

I'm constantly trying to reevaluate my common sense, you see.
no comments
Re: Flaubert's requirements for happiness         


Author: Joseph Littleshoes
Date: Nov 7, 2007 11:49

Kisai wrote:
> On Nov 7, 7:51 am, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
>
>>Kisai wrote:
>>
>>>On Nov 5, 9:48 pm, Joseph Littleshoes isp.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>To be stupid, and selfish, and to have good health are the three
>>>>requirements for happiness; though if stupidity is lacking, the others
>>>>are useless.
>>
>>>Do you have *any* friends whatsoever?
>>
>>Why do you care?
>
>
> Because I'm curious if a person with such the asinine point of view of
> completely devaluing the worth of people could go against my notion of
> common sense and actually entice some wretched, like creature with a
> modicum of friendship. ...
Show full article (0.92Kb)
no comments
Re: Flaubert's requirements for happiness         


Author: Joseph Littleshoes
Date: Nov 7, 2007 11:58

Tom wrote:
Show full article (1.04Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4