On Jun 9, 7:48Â pm, dh@. wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:58:06 -0700 (PDT), Janine Starscream
yahoo.com> wrote:>>On Jun 5, 11:59Â am, dh@. wrote:
>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 00:16:58 -0700 (PDT), "J.P. \"Julian Sebastian\" Bacchae"
gmail.com> wrote:>
>>>>On Jun 4, 7:14 am, dh@. wrote:
>>>>> Â Â He believes what he wants when he wants, and changes
>>>>> his beliefs to suite whatever he wants to believe at the time,
>>>>> or at least he tries to give that impression. There was a time
>>>>> when he claimed to believe individuals could have multiple
>>>>> lives, but the last time we discussed it he denied it. There's
>>>>> no telling what he would say about it by now. There were
>>>>> times when he insisted nothing with any intelligence had
>>>>> anything to do with the development of the universe, or
>>>>> life itself, and then later acted as if he thought there could
>>>>> have been or something like that. He doesn't really know
>>>>> what to think, so...
>
>>>>I've been experimenting with that method of (dis(cordian))organized
>>>>thinking, just to get a feel for each and every kind of fanaticism
>>>>available on the planet right now, with the exception of debased Islam
>>>>for personal reasons, as a means to gain a wider perspective on the
>>>>whole suprapsychology of religious and non-religious thinking
>>>>patterns. Everybody has the option of doing that, but without
>>>>interplay, or ugh, synergy, between the altered veiw points it's just
>>>>being wishy washy.
>
>>> Â Â He appears to have a very hard time making connections
>>> and tying things together in general even though he is trying
>>> to blame religion for encouraging child abuse somehow.
>
>>People get religious at times, even about non-religious subjects. If
>>Rev. Suzy the Floozy was correct about this, the word religion
>>essentially means to bind, or was it to be bound again? Now
>>occassionally getting bound up can be fun: getting bound up in a
>>fruitful activity, getting bound up in sexual pleasure (many meanings
>>for that one, hehe), getting bound up in an adventure, but it can also
>>mean being bound up in servitude, bound up in a parasitic idea, being
>>bound up in disgusting degeneracy which is, regardless if you view
>>them as emotional patterns or shiny hell creatures, rather daimonic.
>
>>Many sexual-negative faiths, the overly dogmatized ones, do indeed
>>encourage members towards perversion
>
> Â Â What kind?
>
>>if they restrict healthy
>>consensual conscious activities to procreation only policies (what a
>>waste of time that is, and overpopulating!) or create matrices of
>>guilt and penance on essentially naturale animal activities that
>>release tension in evolution/design (one can see it either/or/both
>>ways) foundation approved fashions (but not cultural taboos, usually).
>
>>>>I consider majikal progress partially a collage of the many forces/
>>>>intelligences (i figure now it depends on the scope of definitions any
>>>>observer has as the limiting factors on how THAT comes out)
>
>>> Â Â Like what might make it actually work, if it does?
>
>>Could you specify by what you mean by "it", please? :)
>
> Â Â The supposedly majikal progresss.
>
>
>
>
>
>>I don't want to
>>go on a tangent if it's based on a misunderstanding of the subject. By
>>Gods Inc. that happens way too much anyway, oy.
>
>>> to equivalent exchange,
>
>>Of what? you ask... everything... all interactions at all times
>>forever and ever amen... ala The Art of Shen Ku (which imho is very
>>effective)
>
>>But religious hocus pocus aside, it comes down to what form of justice
>>doesn't penalize personal quirks, opens up the world to creativity,
>>quashes fundamentalism, and in general takes the darkness by the neck
>>and screams the terrorgrammtron in it's face so loud it either dies
>>forever or transmutes into something that isn't going to parasitize
>>existence forever.
>
>>It also has quite a bit to do with ecology, and the earth's conscious
>>punishment of man for it's inequity to everything, including man. I
>>don't want to sound too militant about it, because without an easy
>>relaxed attitude this perspective too could become quite a
>>fundamentalism (it already has in some circles unfortunately). I
>>consider it my duty to assist with the earths immune response.
>
>>Help the Goddess out and she makes life real easy... It's better than
>>working with asinine demons thats for Dame sure.
>
> Â Â Are you a Wicken?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Zeal crazed love priest for YHWH, I bow down to the Victorious Christ,
remember all my dead homies in the ancient pantheons (but don't
worship them, just miss them), and I have an enormous amount of
respect and care for the mamma matrix we emerge out of and live in.
One God to whorship in the right way, One Star in Sight to shine the
way of love and conquering justice/tempering mercy, my tribe and
family, my unsung nation, and my home and hearth. I hope that makes my
homonculean stance on this subject pretty clear.
But no, I'm not into the Wicker Man shit. That's just the wrong kind
of sacrfice. The blood gets sprinkled on the Stones for YHWH, he ain't
into fallen human sacrifice, rather into festive barbecues and
jubilant parties. Hallelujah!
Human+Daimon+YHWH= Homonculus spiritual bionic love warrior with
Power>Wisdom>Love>Justice>Freedom
