"Tom"
comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Q9mdnWRhTIbM6SbVnZ2dnUVZ_sninZ2d@comcast.com...>
> "bassos"
askffs.com> wrote in message
> news:48bb54ff$0$200$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...>>
>> "Tom"
comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:wqGdnYDY-KZqXiTVnZ2dnUVZ_tTinZ2d@comcast.com...>>>
>>> "Bassos" wrote in message
>>> news:48b889ca$0$184$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>>>>
>>>> "Tom"
comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:4ZqdnQsUs_1YRCjVnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@comcast.com...>>>>>
>>>>> "Bassos" wrote in message
>>>>> news:48b585f3$0$196$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, so this means :
>>>>>> If astrology works
>>>>>> We need an oath.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you don't need an oath. You need to find out if astrology works.
>>>>
>>>> You complete and utter idiot.
>>>>
>>>> I am asking about an oath before i get significant data.
>>>
>>> But, you see, that's what makes *you* a complete and utter idiot.
>>> You're trying to count your chickens before you even know if you have
>>> any eggs to hatch in the first place.
>>
>> Heh, Tom expresses his inability to understand science.
>
> Would you like to explain to me what part of scientific research includes
> an oath? I'd be fascinated to know just what it is you think "science"
> is.
Note, even after i explained it, Tom stil does not get it.
That's okey lover, this is just you being difficult, you will outgrow that.
>>> Nor are you actually doing any research which could be seriously thought
>>> to be scientific.
>>
>> What research do you think i am doing ?
>
> I just said you're not doing any.
Ah, nice way of completely ignoring the central argument.
Woot woot, Tom.
Noob.
>>> You're not competent to conduct a scientific research project. You
>>> don't know even know how to start designing one.
>>
>> Well, actual science disagrees with you.
>
> "Actual science" is not some person who can disagree with me.
Indeed, it is a set of practices and methods, which you seem to be
completely unclear about.
Even though i already mentioned this :
Formulate theory first.
Then test it.
You noob.
(10 to 1 you will not get it, or if you do get it will not post like you got
it)
Snip rest of Tom's failure.
Mate, i gave plenty of references already about why this is not
straightforward.
At some time this beating you up with statements, should it not get you to
first try my posts, before rejecting them ?
A nice intermezzo is :
When a neuron is born, it follows it path from that moment.
So if you place said born neuron in an older organism (monkey) it still does
it's thing.
(wooot astrology has a neuronal bit of evidence)
Should keep astrology bashers busy long enough.......
