An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.magick only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.magick Profile…
 Up
An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck         


Author: eddieVroom
Date: Nov 27, 2006 13:38

In this brief outline, I shall attempt to provide a overall
interpretation of the major arcana as presented in the O.T.O. Book of
Thoth deck. For this purpose, I propose adopting the following
perspective: The Book of Thoth originated as a picture book outlining
the process of working in the service of the Pharoh's government.

In other words: Government Contracting.

To follow along with this, place card zero (The Fool) to the side and
simply lay out the remaining cards in sequence, in three rows of seven.

Regarding card zero (The Fool) - I have read works suggesting that it
serves as a multiplier in quabbalistic numerology encoded in the deck.
This approach seems to me rather inelegant, as it required laying the
cards in rows of nine, leaving an incomplete third row. With three rows
of seven, however, it seems indicitave of the concept of the Octave
(seven musical notes, primary colors, chakras/major ganglia and
planets). There may also be potential quabbalistic application if
working in Octal Code (Base 8). It may also represent the contractor
himself, but otherwise is given no further consideration in this
writing.

I believe that the three rows of trumps may be considered as such:
Show full article (3.55Kb)
19 Comments
Re: An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck         


Author: eddieVroom
Date: Nov 27, 2006 14:00

...and I hate it when I forget to add my .sig :)

--
the Tortured Spark - a Light in the Dark
the Mystical RevvedErrand Doktor eddieVroom
Northern Lights Motor Lodge
Knights of the Visible Wank-L

He only comes out when I drink my Djinn...

http://www.subgenius.com 23
no comments
Re: An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck         


Author: David Simpson
Date: Nov 27, 2006 19:04

On 27 Nov 2006 13:38:09 -0800, "eddieVroom" yahoo.com>
typed furiously:

Nothing concerning Freemasonry.
--
Regards
David Simpson
(Unattached MM. Victoria, Australia)
Bad manners should not be a capital crime ...
for a first offence.
Paraphrasing Robert Heinlein,
no comments
Re: An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck         


Author: michaelalcandor
Date: Nov 27, 2006 19:09

satanist Aleister Crowley was freemason, so it is very relevant to
freemasonry.
David Simpson wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2006 13:38:09 -0800, "eddieVroom" yahoo.com>
> typed furiously:
>
> Nothing concerning Freemasonry.
> --
> Regards
> David Simpson
> (Unattached MM. Victoria, Australia)
> Bad manners should not be a capital crime ...
> for a first offence.
> Paraphrasing Robert Heinlein,
no comments
Re: An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck         


Author: innerjewel
Date: Nov 27, 2006 21:39

michaelalcandor@gmail.com wrote:
> satanist Aleister Crowley was freemason, so it is very relevant to
> freemasonry.

Crowley was not a regularly initiated freemason. He allegedly recieved
some degrees in a clandestine Lodge in Mexico but quickly lost interest
when he found that he couldn't exploit his bogus Lodge for...
Show full article (0.93Kb)
1 Comment
Re: An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck         


Author: psidre felix
Date: Nov 27, 2006 22:57

On 27 Nov 2006 13:38:09 -0800, eddieVroom wrote:
> In this brief outline, I shall attempt to provide a overall
> interpretation of the major arcana as presented in the O.T.O. Book of
> Thoth deck. For this purpose, I propose adopting the following
>...
Show full article (4.44Kb)
no comments
Re: An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck         


Author: nenslo
Date: Nov 28, 2006 12:10

In article <1164663489.763269.135790@14g2000cws.googlegroups.com>,
"eddieVroom" yahoo.com> wrote:
> In this brief outline, I shall attempt to provide a overall
> interpretation of the major arcana as presented in the O.T.O. Book of
> Thoth deck. For this purpose, I propose adopting the following
> perspective: The Book of Thoth originated as a picture book outlining
> the process of working in the service of the Pharoh's government.
>
> In other words: Government Contracting.

Another fine example of A=B!
no comments
Re: An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck         


Author: innerjewel
Date: Nov 28, 2006 16:57

"Actually he was recieved as a regular(ie Brit approved)Mason in a Blue
Lodge
in Paris. The Mexican degrees were Scottish Rite or something not(Brit
approved), but pendant to the Blue Lodge. "

Which Lodge was he initiated in? Where are your sources for this? I'm
interested to learn where you came up with this. If he were a regularly
initiated Mason he would not be associating himself with these
clandestine Mexican Lodges.
no comments
Re: An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck         


Author: innerjewel
Date: Nov 28, 2006 17:33

http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/aqc/crowley.html#018

As I have previously read elsewhere, Masonic recognition in his native
England eluded Crowley his whole life. He obviously thought that it was
important to be recognised as a "regular" mason as were his rivals
Wescott and others. Several letters adressed to the UGLE have survived
in which he asks to be recognised. Cut and paste this link if you are
interested.
Freemasonry as is practiced in regular Lodges has nothing to do with
Tarot Cards. If a brother is inclined to use them as part of his own
personal belief system, he is free to do so. He will likely find that
Masons are not interested in his beliefs about Tarot Cards, Astrology
or other New Agey subjects.
no comments
Re: An Interpretation of the Major Arcana in the O.T.O. Thoth Tarot Deck         


Author: Sar Draconis
Date: Nov 28, 2006 22:14

innerjewel wrote:
> "Actually he was recieved as a regular(ie Brit approved)Mason in a Blue
> Lodge
> in Paris. The Mexican degrees were Scottish Rite or something not(Brit
> approved), but pendant to the Blue Lodge. "
>
> Which Lodge was he initiated in? Where are your sources for this? I'm
> interested to learn where you came up with this. If he were a regularly
> initiated Mason he would not be associating himself with these
> clandestine Mexican Lodges.

I shall presume that you are referring to Aleister Crowley. Crowley
was never recognized as a Mason by the United Grand Lodge of England.
But this does not mean that he was not initiated.

Following the schism with the Grand Orient over the question of
requiring belief in a Supreme Being as prerequisite for membership, the
United Grand Lodge of England withdrew recognition not only from the
Grand Orient of France, but over every other masonic jurisdiction in
France, except for its own client lodge, called Grand Loge National de
France, which it created in 1913.

However, the Mother Supreme Jurisdiction of Scottish Rite for the World
(i.e., the "Southern Jurisdiction of Scottish Rite" in the United
States) had chartered an independant Supreme Council for Scottish...
Show full article (4.18Kb)
no comments
1 2