hey thats a relief phew:)
cool you have medicines as me and watery eyes hey its like we are
twins:)
i allways tell everyone im a walking medicne cabanit:)
they smile:)
and somtimes i get somone not only smile but they say me to:)
ps magicmofo i pray your ok to and your eyes get better:)
in CHRIST allways fat bill page illusionist magician in fun
friendly neihbor hood spider man friend:)
same bat time same bat channel
holy batmites batman
im a walking tv guide too:)
and also people call me a walking magic book:)
Publish These Articles (28644)
Recently visited [clear]
alt.halloween.boo
alt.magic
alt.magic.secrets
alt.video.dvd
houston.politics
k12.chat.teacher
mail.net-happenings
rec.arts.disney.parks
rec.martial-arts
Video Game World
Groups Alerts
Create a group... cooltobefat@
webtv.net | My Groups | Favorites |
Profile | Help | My Account | Sign out
alt.magic.secrets
Discussions
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
The Dr. Hooker "Impossibilities" Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display
first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from
another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
Standard view View as tree
Proportional text Fixed text
2 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to
this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the
Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
randwill View profile
More options Mar 21, 1:09 pm
Newsgroups: alt.magic.secrets
From: "randwill"
triad.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:09:41 GMT
Local: Fri, Mar 21 2008 1:09 pm
Subject: The Dr. Hooker "Impossibilities"
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
The article about Dr. Hooker's Card Rise in the new Genii has got my
wheels
turning. Just how was it possible to make any card called for rise
from a
deck? The article states that the houlette was examined by the
spectators,
so I guess one or both needed to be switched. The article also
implies that
off-stage assistance was required. The effect was invented and first
performed in the 20's and the article says that it didn't use any
technology
then that couldn't have been applied 100 years prior to that. So
thread
seems to be a viable solution. I'm thinking a deck switch to a deck
prepared
with a thread attached to the top of every card. The threads would
rise up
to a framework above the stage and travel off-stage to the assistant.
Each
thread would have something attached to it saying which card it was.
The
background of the stage setting is sufficiently 'busy' enough to hide
the
thread in the right lighting.
Ahh, but that it would happen under a glass dome seems to be a problem
with
this theory.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text
for clearing space
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ray Haddad View profile
More options Mar 21, 3:09 pm
Newsgroups: alt.magic.secrets
From: Ray Haddad perthmagic.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 04:09:03 +0900
Local: Fri, Mar 21 2008 3:09 pm
Subject: Re: The Dr. Hooker "Impossibilities"
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:09:41 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and "randwill" triad.rr.com> instead replied:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
>The article about Dr. Hooker's Card Rise in the new Genii has got my wheels
>turning. Just how was it possible to make any card called for rise from a
>deck? The article states that the houlette was examined by the spectators,
>so I guess one or both needed to be switched. The article also implies that
>off-stage assistance was required. The effect was invented and first
>performed in the 20's and the article says that it didn't use any technology
>then that couldn't have been applied 100 years prior to that. So thread
>seems to be a viable solution. I'm thinking a deck switch to a deck prepared
>with a thread attached to the top of every card. The threads would rise up
>to a framework above the stage and travel off-stage to the assistant. Each
>thread would have something attached to it saying which card it was. The
>background of the stage setting is sufficiently 'busy' enough to hide the
>thread in the right lighting.
