David Copperfield's Magic Secrets Revealed
Warning SPOILER FOLLOWS!
Steel Plate
Notice the flexible rubber-like blanket? Notice how they flipped it up
a bunch of times? Very early on, David slid out from under the sheet
during one of the flips. The remaining shapeless blob was either
placed there by David, or it was something going up through the holes
in the plate, or the plate was not solid steel

Duck
The duck was inflatable and mechanical. There was a real duck in the
beginning, but that was just to make the audience think there were
only 2 ducks- the real and stuffed. The stuffed duck was ratty, dingy
and limp. It was obviously a fake. The purpose of this duck was to
reinforce the image of the other duck(s) as one duck. There were at
least 3 ducks. Note the box that the duck was placed into had a lid
that was fairly thick, say 2 inches. The inflated duck deflated
immediately after David placed it in the bottom. The bottom of the box
was spring loaded. When David placed the duck inside, the springs
retraced the bottom of the box upward towards the lid

Portal to Phillipines
With video, you can do anything. The image on the beach was pre-
recorded. Just because the gal was wearing the same clothes doesn't
mean doggie-doo. She also went to the Phillipines...

On Jul 3, 9:36 pm, bill page webtv.net> wrote:

Mr Bader thinks he has the right to "copyright" his theft of someone
else's ideas? The irony just drips!

Incidently bill, you just presented "copyrighted" material without
permission. The FBI will be breaking down your door any minute now.

Ed wrote:

Well, yes, if they are his words. You can copyright words, not ideas.
You can patent ideas.

In message <48710b67$0$5002$607ed4bc@cv.net>, John W Kennedy
attglobal.net> writes

No, you can patent devices.

--
Will Tingle

"Will Tingle" YOUR.PANTSwillsbedroom.co.uk> wrote in message
news:IaSLtGclA0dIFwyT@willsbedroom.freeserve.co.uk...

As someone who draws devices for a patent attorney, I can verify that.

randwill wrote:

And since when has a "process", which is unequivocally patentable in the
US, been a "device"?

"John W Kennedy" attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:48777a82$0$11606$607ed4bc@cv.net...