yep art ive seen coolillusionist david seth kot kin copperfield
voer live one or wo times atchryler hall i norfolk virginia and
yep back stage its all dark:) that makes cool illusion stand out
more:) my guys is the snapping is the two connecttions un congoin
then re join back fused to geather idea:)
bush gardens emarld dance isvery cool magical:) and neat a cool
chubby jewis kid ask my while we are on train at train station in
bush gardens park:) excuse me sir but do you know were we
are?:) i looked had to think get my bearings:) decided to
look on map but he heard some people say france:)then i said france:)
so the cubby kid said thats ok sir :) we got it:) then i said
ok :)
wednesday august 8, 2007
a nother squilching hot day today 110 heat index phew
drnk plenty of ice cold watter plus had some dip and dots talk to a
bush gardens coolwoker name ((ron:)) he is cool tothe max:)
he even let us know the griffon broken down
around 1pm then at 2pm the started testing new griffon roler
coaster by letting ghost coaster head out onthe tracks
then at 4:30pm griffon wasfixedcause on train we saw lots of folks
lineuptoride new rolleroaster it looked like people in thecoaster now.
and sign posted everywhere sayin excuse the mess making preperations
for HOLLOWSCREAM JACK IS BACK
at 5pm wento craker barele inwilliams burg
had chicken and dumpling with ice cold glass spritesoda plus mashed
potatoes with gravy and biscut withbutter andjelly
and played yourubicks cube somone at theresraunt storemixed up i
picked it up startyed solving rubicks cube heard kids say hey lookhes
solving it:) ps drats got it solved but bottom part ran into a
problem could notsolve cube cause somone took sticker off pt the in
the wrong patteren direction
so with out cube mixed with no sticker tooken off idea can no solve
rubicks cube
it has to be in right patterns or it can not be solved unless you
cheat pt sticker in rightpattern to be solved
Publish These Articles (2375)
Recently visited [clear]
alt.magic
alt.magic.secrets
alt.movies
alt.sex.stories.d
alt.support.diabetes
alt.support.diet
alt.tv
rec.arts.sf.movies
soc.support....ceptance
uk.games.vid...ystation
Groups Alerts
Create a group... cooltobefat@
webtv.net | My Groups | Favorites |
Profile | Help | My Account | Sign out
alt.magic.secrets
Discussions
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
David Copperfield Voyeur illusion Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display
first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from
another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
Standard view View as tree
Proportional text Fixed text
5 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to
this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the
Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Minton M View profile
More options Aug 4, 8:29 pm
Newsgroups: alt.magic.secrets
From: Minton M
gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 00:29:11 -0000
Local: Sat, Aug 4 2007 8:29 pm
Subject: David Copperfield Voyeur illusion
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
I'm interested in learning more about this vanishing trick, which
seems essentially the same as the first part of Spirits (getting the
people in and out of the the room). Except, with Voyeur on the live
TV
performance, the background is not dark, there are people sat all
around the stage, and the platform has no hiding space. Obviously,
I'm
not posting a 'tell me how it's done' message because that's idiotic,
but I'd be interested in being pointed in a direction to learn more
about this particular method.
Any information would help! Thanks.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text
for clearing space
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
randwill View profile
More options Aug 4, 11:55 pm
Newsgroups: alt.magic.secrets
From: "randwill" triad.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 03:55:31 GMT
Local: Sat, Aug 4 2007 11:55 pm
Subject: Re: David Copperfield Voyeur illusion
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
"Minton M" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1186273751.325767.72190@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> I'm interested in learning more about this vanishing trick, which
> seems essentially the same as the first part of Spirits (getting the
> people in and out of the the room). Except, with Voyeur on the live TV
> performance, the background is not dark, there are people sat all
> around the stage, and the platform has no hiding space. Obviously, I'm
> not posting a 'tell me how it's done' message because that's idiotic,
> but I'd be interested in being pointed in a direction to learn more
> about this particular method.
> Any information would help! Thanks.
My memory of that television special is that there were several things
he
did, the laser-cutting-himself-in-half thing comes to mind, that could
not
really be performed surrounded without the people in back seeing the
secret.
At the time, I seem to remember people speculating that the seats
behind him
had fake people, cut-outs or whatever, or that they were industry
people, or
just audience members who got treated to seeing the workings of a few
tricks, all for the benefit of making the home viewer believe that
those
effects had no secrets that could be seen from the rear. In fact, if
you
were back there, you'd have seen it all. So when trying to work out
this
particular illusion, don't let your thinking be constrained by a
false
assumption.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post: Text
for clearing space
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
Minton M View profile
More options Aug 5, 6:36 am
Newsgroups: alt.magic.secrets
From: Minton M
gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:36:53 -0000
Local: Sun, Aug 5 2007 6:36 am
Subject: Re: David Copperfield Voyeur illusion
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Aug 4, 10:55 pm, "randwill" triad.rr.com> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> "Minton M"
gmail.com> wrote in message>> I'm interested in learning more about this vanishing trick, which
>> seems essentially the same as the first part of Spirits (getting the
>> people in and out of the the room). Except, with Voyeur on the live TV
>> performance, the background is not dark, there are people sat all
>> around the stage, and the platform has no hiding space. Obviously, I'm
>> not posting a 'tell me how it's done' message because that's idiotic,
>> but I'd be interested in being pointed in a direction to learn more
>> about this particular method.
>> Any information would help! Thanks.
> My memory of that television special is that there were several things he
> did, the laser-cutting-himself-in-half thing comes to mind, that could not
> really be performed surrounded without the people in back seeing the secret.
> At the time, I seem to remember people speculating that the seats behind him
> had fake people, cut-outs or whatever, or that they were industry people, or
> just audience members who got treated to seeing the workings of a few
> tricks, all for the benefit of making the home viewer believe that those
> effects had no secrets that could be seen from the rear. In fact, if you
> were back there, you'd have seen it all. So when trying to work out this
> particular illusion, don't let your thinking be constrained by a false
> assumption.
I really appreciate your post. I was already contemplating either
video editing or plants. Which is really sad. I know perfectly well
how to do these tricks, but I thought he'd found a different way.
After watching for so many times, I've concluded it wasn't live. :-(
Still the timing was perfect! Oh, and I really liked the reappearance
stage - although the trick is simple, it's beautifully performed.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
Art View profile
More options Aug 7, 5:56 pm
Newsgroups: alt.magic.secrets
From: "Art"
mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:56:57 GMT
Local: Tues, Aug 7 2007 5:56 pm
Subject: Re: David Copperfield Voyeur illusion
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Voyeur was performed routinely in DC's live show for years. No
audience
behind it and the background was dark. You could also hear a snap
sound.
Still the timing was remarkable. I saw it twice live.
"Minton M" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1186310213.438359.164880@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> On Aug 4, 10:55 pm, "randwill"
triad.rr.com> wrote:>> "Minton M"
gmail.com> wrote in message>>> I'm interested in learning more about this vanishing trick, which
>>> seems essentially the same as the first part of Spirits (getting the
>>> people in and out of the the room). Except, with Voyeur on the live TV
>>> performance, the background is not dark, there are people sat all
>>> around the stage, and the platform has no hiding space. Obviously, I'm
>>> not posting a 'tell me how it's done' message because that's idiotic,
>>> but I'd be interested in being pointed in a direction to learn more
>>> about this particular method.
>>> Any information would help! Thanks.
>> My memory of that television special is that there were several things he
>> did, the laser-cutting-himself-in-half thing comes to mind, that could
>> not
>> really be performed surrounded without the people in back seeing the
>> secret.
>> At the time, I seem to remember people speculating that the seats behind
>> him
>> had fake people, cut-outs or whatever, or that they were industry people,
>> or
>> just audience members who got treated to seeing the workings of a few
>> tricks, all for the benefit of making the home viewer believe that those
>> effects had no secrets that could be seen from the rear. In fact, if you
>> were back there, you'd have seen it all. So when trying to work out this
>> particular illusion, don't let your thinking be constrained by a false
>> assumption.
> I really appreciate your post. I was already contemplating either
> video editing or plants. Which is really sad. I know perfectly well
> how to do these tricks, but I thought he'd found a different way.
> After watching for so many times, I've concluded it wasn't live. :-(
> Still the timing was perfect! Oh, and I really liked the reappearance
> stage - although the trick is simple, it's beautifully performed.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
Art View profile
More options Aug 7, 5:59 pm
Newsgroups: alt.magic.secrets
From: "Art"
mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:59:01 GMT
Local: Tues, Aug 7 2007 5:59 pm
Subject: Re: David Copperfield Voyeur illusion
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
If you really want to be disappointed, study the first illusion when
he is
produced from falling curtains. Notice that the left back edge of the
board
is cut off for a while and the board is held at a steep angle for a
while.
These were not coincidences. Think paid audience.
"Art" mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:JU5ui.14287$Od7.204@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> Voyeur was performed routinely in DC's live show for years. No audience
> behind it and the background was dark. You could also hear a snap sound.
> Still the timing was remarkable. I saw it twice live.
>> On Aug 4, 10:55 pm, "randwill"
triad.rr.com> wrote:>>> "Minton M"
gmail.com> wrote in message>>>> I'm interested in learning more about this vanishing trick, which
>>>> seems essentially the same as the first part of Spirits (getting the
>>>> people in and out of the the room). Except, with Voyeur on the live TV
>>>> performance, the background is not dark, there are people sat all
>>>> around the stage, and the platform has no hiding space. Obviously, I'm
>>>> not posting a 'tell me how it's done' message because that's idiotic,
>>>> but I'd be interested in being pointed in a direction to learn more
>>>> about this particular method.
>>>> Any information would help! Thanks.
>>> My memory of that television special is that there were several things
>>> he
>>> did, the laser-cutting-himself-in-half thing comes to mind, that could
>>> not
>>> really be performed surrounded without the people in back seeing the
>>> secret.
>>> At the time, I seem to remember people speculating that the seats behind
>>> him
>>> had fake people, cut-outs or whatever, or that they were industry
>>> people, or
>>> just audience members who got treated to seeing the workings of a few
>>> tricks, all for the benefit of making the home viewer believe that those
>>> effects had no secrets that could be seen from the rear. In fact, if
>>> you
>>> were back there, you'd have seen it all. So when trying to work out
>>> this
>>> particular illusion, don't let your thinking be constrained by a false
>>> assumption.
>> I really appreciate your post. I was already contemplating either
>> video editing or plants. Which is really sad. I know perfectly well
>> how to do these tricks, but I thought he'd found a different way.
>> After watching for so many times, I've concluded it wasn't live. :-(
>> Still the timing was perfect! Oh, and I really liked the reappearance
>> stage - although the trick is simple, it's beautifully performed.
Reply Reply to author Forward Rate this post:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic Older topic »
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service -
Privacy Policy
©2007 Google
