> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:20:57 GMT, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and "RJM" virgin.net> instead replied:
>

>>"Ray Haddad" iexpress.net.au> wrote in message
>>news:qsgaf35k1cp8p7kffbs043fibubfubi38k@4ax.com...

>>> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:28:16 -0700, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>>> and Ed hotmail.com> instead replied:
>>>

>>>>On Sep 22, 10:48 am, Sylvia cliffhangerREMOVE.com> wrote:

>>>>> Ed hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>> On Sep 8, 5:57 pm, Ray Haddad iexpress.net.au> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> This is my form of relaxation, to read and post here, John. Do
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> like the occasional glass of wine? A fine cigar? A walk in the
>>>>>>>>> park? Suppose every time you poured a glass, lit a cigar or
>>>>>>>>> went
>>>>>>>>> for a walk, a most annoying character was there making false
>>>>>>>>> accusations about you and things you stated? Would you like it?
>>>>>>>>> Would you rather that person simply go away or stop?

>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>

>>>>>> Y'know what Ray? I was trying to be on your side. I thought; we're
>>>>>> dealing with events from 30+ years ago, it's possible that Ray is
>>>>>> actually correct but a little mixed up on dates or even simply
>>>>>> exaggerating as such. I even posted on one of these threads that
>>>>>> maybe
>>>>>> you're the cyber equivelant of someone's Grampa, sitting on the
>>>>>> porch
>>>>>> reminicing on how he single handedly "won the war!" But now, you've
>>>>>> just said you like to "relax" by posting delibertly ambigous
>>>>>> statements designed to annoy people. That's the earmark of a classic
>>>>>> troll. I think Silvia is a "psycho hose beast" in her over-reaction
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> you, but you're on your own.

>>>>>
>>>>> Define "over-reaction", Ed. At the time you wrote that, you had posted
>>>>> as many times to this thread as I had... 7 posts out of about 160.
>>>>> Take
>>>>> a look at the following link and see just who had been posting away
>>>>> the
>>>>> most. HINT: RAY HADDAD, at 38 posts. If I had enough room to show the
>>>>> rest of the posts for that last day, he would have still easily held
>>>>> the
>>>>> lead with 46 posts. You had one more, I had no more.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://gardex.googlepages.com/ED_posting.gif/ED_posting-full.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> Define "psycho hose beast" over-reaction, Ed. Yes, yes, I am quite
>>>>> aware
>>>>> that the Haddadian Trio keeps posting that *I* am the one generating
>>>>> the
>>>>> most posts, but now that the scales have started to fall from your
>>>>> eyes,
>>>>> you *might* want to consider that they have been lying. All three
>>>>> posted
>>>>> more than I did... so, how am I over-reating?
>>>>>
>>>>> [ And, what the heck is a "hose beast"? ]

>>>>
>>>>The line is actually from "Wayne's World" and describes Wayne's ex-
>>>>girlfriend who seems to have serious problems.
>>>>
>>>>It's not a question of who's posted the most. It's a question of
>>>>content. Your posts are actually scary to read.

>>>
>>> Golly, Sylvia. Two rejections by Ed in one day. What will you ever
>>> do? Seems a lot of folk here are now questioning your version of
>>> truth. Your downfall was inevitable.

>>
>>Yeah, right. Two rejections by Ed Who. A "lot" of folk "here"
>>have always questioned your version of truth, Stupid Guy.
>>Three people "here" are trying really hard to give you the benefit
>>of the doubt. Many more of us "here" don't doubt that you're
>>a fat, lying turd. I think you're a fat, lying turd. I think you're a fat
>>lying turd stinking up the place "here". It's what you do, Ray,
>>you stink. Fortunately for you, in these ngs "downfall" is never
>>inevitable. In your case, downwind is the problem.

>
> Nothing will change the fact that Sylvia has fallen from grace. She
> earned it, Robert.