>
>
>Cliff wrote:

>>

>

>> [
>> inertia
>> /inersh/
>>
>> • noun 1 a tendency to do nothing or to remain unchanged. 2 Physics a property
>> of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion
>> in a straight line, unless changed by an external force.
>> ]

>
>Cliff:
>
> Now you're resorting to dictionary definitions as your source of
>knowledge of physics? LMAO!

>Cliff wrote:

>>
>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:02:56 GMT, BottleBob earthlink.net> wrote:
>>

>

>>>Cliff:
>>>
>>> Where do you see "a harsh and forceful verbal attack" in my question
>>>"Only our CURRENT government, or generally most all governments?"

>>
>> Perhaps your first post was political .

>
>Cliff:
>
> Nope.
>
> You're wrong again. There was nothing political about it.

>> Heh, well at the time I has some illusions of writing down a number of
>>my experiences over the 20 years that I street raced, possibly combining
>>them in a book of racing short stories. But I believe it would have
>>appealed to a VERY small audience.

>
>
>They make movies of street racing for Ricers ;)
>

>>
>>

>>> I have printed out so many copies of your racing post to hot rod
>>> people I had to buy a new printer.

>>
>> LMAO Now that's funny. I hope those hot rod people enjoyed the
>>story.

>
>Most said is read like a mystery novel , & they couldn't put it down.
>Will Bob get caught, will Bob win, will Bob get his money?

>
>
>Cliff wrote:

>>
>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:52:44 GMT, BottleBob earthlink.net> wrote:
>>

>>>Cliff:
>>>
>>> Now you're resorting to dictionary definitions as your source of
>>>knowledge of physics? LMAO!

>>
>> Just trying to keep it simple for you & I was already at the Oxford
>> Dictionary.

>
>Cliff:
>
> Of COURSE you were. LOL

>Cliff wrote:

>>
>> On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 05:00:49 GMT, BottleBob earthlink.net> wrote:
>>

>

>>> Did you miss where even your dictionary definition said inertia was "a
>>>property of matter"?

>>
>> Did you miss the point that having a noise does not mean that you have
>> a thing?
>> There are LOTS of noises !!

>
>Cliff:
>
> But YOU were using your dictionary definition as if it were a valid
>explanation.

>
> On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:59:34 GMT, BottleBob earthlink.net> wrote:

>>Cliff:
>>
>> But YOU were using your dictionary definition as if it were a valid
>>explanation.

>
> Nope.
> Just for your enjoyment.

>

>>NOW you're saying it was just noise, when you don't agree
>>with part of it? LMAO!

>
> Those pecks of "inertia" should be pretty easy for you to
> find by now. Where are they?

>
>
> A close friend for decades is manager of an auto body shop that does a
>lot of movie work. They did the cars in the three "Fast and Furious"
>movies. He even bought one of the ricer cars after the first movie for
>his daughter. Bright yellow, fart exhaust, wing, stickers all over.
>But she was getting harassed to race all the time so they sold it and
>got something low-profile.
>

> Heh, well I didn't ALWAYS get away. That's why I've had something like
>65 tickets on 4 licenses. But I did successfully run about 24 times,
>about 2/3 of those times I KNEW the cop was after me because of lights
>and/or siren, and the other 1/3 times I didn't know for sure if I was
>being chased but didn't wait around to see.

>

>> Bright yellow, fart exhaust, wing, stickers all over.
>>But she was getting harassed to race all the time so they sold it and
>>got something low-profile.
>>

>
> Maybe an 1970 LS6 Chevelle, 375 HP, in primer ;)

>

>> Heh, well I didn't ALWAYS get away. That's why I've had something like
>>65 tickets on 4 licenses. But I did successfully run about 24 times,
>>about 2/3 of those times I KNEW the cop was after me because of lights
>>and/or siren, and the other 1/3 times I didn't know for sure if I was
>>being chased but didn't wait around to see.

>
> Well, BB quit wasting time with Cliff & type it all up!

>> Well, BB quit wasting time with Cliff & type it all up!

>
> I've been trying to disengage myself from responding to Cliff. Not an
>easy task for me it seems. I hate leaving any loose ends, but perhaps
>just cutting him off cold turkey, loose ends or not, is what is going to
>be required.